You were the one that was insisting that creation science is invalid because a limited subset (of which you haven’t provided example) claims damnation based on disbelief of Genesis.
All I’m telling you is that, IF those people exist, THAT PART of their assertion is in error.
I’m not even sure why you were trying to use that as a “disproval” of creation science.
“All I’m telling you is that, IF those people exist, THAT PART of their assertion is in error.”
If that part is in error, something as fundamental as that, why would you believe anything they published?