[MrB]

And, even if you DO come up with a couple of folks that believe that way, it doesn’t mean that the denial of salvation is the basis of creation science,

nor does it in some way invalidate the premises of creation science if such folks do exist.

It’s a side issue, a strawman.

[RFEngineer]

“And, even if you DO come up with a couple of folks that believe that way, it doesn’t mean that the denial of salvation is the basis of creation science,”

Ok, so should I even bother proving that “fire-and-brimstone” Christians exist, or will you at least concede that point?

Shall we discuss why “Creation Science” exists at all then?

[RFEngineer]

“nor does it in some way invalidate the premises of creation science if such folks do exist.”

Just searching around.....Would a group that stated this (below) be a valid example of “creation science”?

“Those who reject Him, however, or who neglect to believe on Him, thereby continue in their state of rebellion and must ultimately be consigned to the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels.”