[RFEngineer]

“And yet you have yet to provide a quote or a citation to this effect.”

Is it really necessary to prove that there are fundamentalists that literally believe the Bible is true and that eternal damnation is achievable through lack of belief in it’s literal nature?

They’ve told me directly on previous threads, unfortunately I am unable to search the references at this time.

I am amused that you deny the “fire-and-brimstone” sect of Christianity exists at all, however, and that “creation science” is consistent with it.

[MrB]

Is it really necessary to prove that there are fundamentalists that literally believe the Bible is true and that eternal damnation is achievable through lack of belief in it’s literal nature?

If you're going to paint with that brush, yes, indeed, you must prove that the brush exists.

[MrB]

And, even if you DO come up with a couple of folks that believe that way, it doesn’t mean that the denial of salvation is the basis of creation science,

nor does it in some way invalidate the premises of creation science if such folks do exist.

It’s a side issue, a strawman.