Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Budge
Yes, I see it, but not on the earlier post #27. Sweetliberty was right to be prudent, it is Kathleen who should either publish the letter with her name, or not.
I have reservations about putting this info out at all, name or not. Mud often splatters more than its target. The child might be hurt, we might look mean-spirited, the Schindlers likewise. It could backfire, even if it's true.
124 posted on 10/26/2003 2:54:43 PM PST by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: Graymatter
In the interests of clarity...when I wrote "I see it, but not on the earlier post #27," I mean that is the one I read. Some folks get through these threads faster than ole Graymatter. Hope that clears things up?
125 posted on 10/26/2003 3:08:12 PM PST by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

To: Graymatter; sweetliberty; Pegita
I'm caught up now. I agree that Glenn Beck will get that letter out there if it's wise to do so, and he'll know how to protect Kathy and how much protection is legally necessary/desirable.

I'm sickened that Dr. Laura can't see which of her precious Ten Commandments applies in this case, and act accordingly. I guess the homosexual activitists who worked to silence her last time scalded her too deeply, and she's lost her nerve.
129 posted on 10/26/2003 3:38:42 PM PST by ChemistCat (Hang in there, Terri. Absorb. Take in. Live. Heal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

To: Graymatter; Budge; sweetliberty
I disagree with your contention that this may not be the opportune or prudent time to disclose this information.

I suggest that corroborating evidence be obtained by Kathleen regarding the existence of the child MS fathered while married to Terri prior to day she sustained the injuries resulting in her current condition. Once that evidence is compiled, verified and re-verified, Kathleen's original letter to the newspaper should be disseminated for public review. The name of the child should not be included, just as it was not included in the original letter. However, once the information has been made public, MS can take the opportunity to affirm or deny the allegation as he sees fit. There would be absolutely no need for him to reveal the name of the child either, but it would be much more difficult for him to deny the allegation understanding Kathleen and her attorny(ies) can fully substantiate her claim. The ball would be in his court.

In any event, the entire purpose of this disclosure would be to evaluate the state of the Schiavo marriage over a decade ago on the evening of Terri's unexplained collapse, and help interested observers formulate an opinion regarding the sincerity of MS' "love" for Terri then and now.
131 posted on 10/26/2003 4:04:23 PM PST by EODGUY (Terri needs our prayers for a new guardian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

To: Graymatter
I understand what you're saying and I agree, but - we need to contact people who are in a position, media, government, whatever, with whom SL can put in contact with Kathleen.
132 posted on 10/26/2003 4:13:11 PM PST by Budge ( <>< .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson