[EODGUY]

I disagree with your contention that this may not be the opportune or prudent time to disclose this information.

I suggest that corroborating evidence be obtained by Kathleen regarding the existence of the child MS fathered while married to Terri prior to day she sustained the injuries resulting in her current condition. Once that evidence is compiled, verified and re-verified, Kathleen's original letter to the newspaper should be disseminated for public review. The name of the child should not be included, just as it was not included in the original letter. However, once the information has been made public, MS can take the opportunity to affirm or deny the allegation as he sees fit. There would be absolutely no need for him to reveal the name of the child either, but it would be much more difficult for him to deny the allegation understanding Kathleen and her attorny(ies) can fully substantiate her claim. The ball would be in his court.

In any event, the entire purpose of this disclosure would be to evaluate the state of the Schiavo marriage over a decade ago on the evening of Terri's unexplained collapse, and help interested observers formulate an opinion regarding the sincerity of MS' "love" for Terri then and now.

[Budge]

In any event, the entire purpose of this disclosure would be to evaluate the state of the Schiavo marriage over a decade ago on the evening of Terri's unexplained collapse, and help interested observers formulate an opinion regarding the sincerity of MS' "love" for Terri then and now.

Exactly.