[Budge]

Yes, so at the time she wrote the letter she was aware the paper might publish her name and address and means of contact. It was ok then. Why is she now "publishing" it here but unwilling to be named?

Graymatter, please go back shortly after post #27 from sweetliberty and read what the poster (sweetliberty) has said about just who deleted her name.

I just got home from work and already I know who deleted her name, just by reading a little further.

[Graymatter]

Yes, I see it, but not on the earlier post #27. Sweetliberty was right to be prudent, it is Kathleen who should either publish the letter with her name, or not.
I have reservations about putting this info out at all, name or not. Mud often splatters more than its target. The child might be hurt, we might look mean-spirited, the Schindlers likewise. It could backfire, even if it's true.