Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2 pit bulls dragged by car, 1 injured
St. Petersburg Times ^ | 4-23-2003 | Megan Scott

Posted on 04/23/2003 10:03:12 AM PDT by Cagey

A Palm Harbor man is charged with one felony count of animal cruelty. He told officers he was disciplining his dogs.

[Times photos: Douglas Clifford]
Bruno rests in a holding room Tuesday before technicians changed dressings on his paws.

By MEGAN SCOTT
© St. Petersburg Times
published April 23, 2003


PALM HARBOR -- He tried walking them with his bicycle, but they kept stopping and refused to keep up.

photo
Jaworowsky
So George Jaworowsky, 46, returned home to get his car, Pinellas sheriff's officials say.

He rolled the window down, held the leashes out and proceeded to drag his two red-nosed American pit bullterriers for two blocks down the street, sheriff's spokesman Detective Tim Goodman said.

"There was blood on the roadway," Goodman said. "The dogs kept falling and were rolling on the gravel road."

One of the dogs, a male named Bruno, had the pads on its feet worn down to the bone. Jaworowsky was charged with one felony count of animal cruelty.

The incident occurred about 5 p.m. Monday in the Groves subdivision off Alderman Road in Palm Harbor. A witness saw Jaworowsky holding the leashes for the two dogs out the driver's window of his white Ford Taurus as he drove on Robinwood Lane and Regal Oaks Boulevard.

photo
Medical technician Alison Lynch hugs Bruno as dressings on the dog's paws are changed.
"The person saw George get out of the car," Goodman said. "George was yelling at the dogs and he used his right hand to strike one of the dogs. He was cursing at the dogs. The (witness) heard the dogs yelp."

The witness told Jaworowsky that "the dogs looked tired and beaten," Goodman said. But Jaworowsky got back in his car and drove off, still dragging the dogs from the window.

The deputy who responded to the scene followed the trail of bloody paw prints and pieces of brown fur into the garage at 2872 Spring Oak Court, Jaworowsky's home.

"He got to the garage and he noticed bloody paw prints on the garage floor, and a bloody white and black dog leash lying on the ground," Goodman said.

Bruno and Susie, both around 6 months old, were found inside the garage in a metal cage. Bruno's paws were wrapped in duct tape to the middle of his legs. The dog tried to stand but could not and was lying on its side because the pads on its feet were so badly injured.

Susie was not injured.

Both were taken to Tampa Bay Veterinary Emergency Service on Belcher Road. The dogs were then turned over to the Humane Society of North Pinellas.

"Bruno's in a lot of pain," said Rick Chaboudy, director of the Humane Society of North Pinellas. "Pain management is one of the biggest things right now, and, of course, concern with infection."

Jaworowsky, who was released from the Pinellas County Jail after posting $5,000 bail, did not return calls for comment or two messages left at his home. A car sat in the driveway Monday afternoon.

Goodman said Jaworowsky told deputies he was "attempting to train the dogs, but he says he was wrong for what he did."

"When (deputies) interviewed George, they asked him if he ever stopped and hit the dogs," Goodman said. "He said he did and that it was a form of discipline. He said he was doing it to get the dogs in shape."

Chaboudy said the shelter has since discovered Bruno was involved in a previous dragging incident with a family member on inline skates.

"That type of thing is very dangerous," he said. "Sometimes people run their dogs on bicycles and Rollerblades. In many ways it can be dangerous to the person. I cannot possibly even imagine how people think some of these types of things like running a dog along a car is actually okay."

Surgery technician Anna Ellis gets a friendly lick from Susie.

Chaboudy said it appears Jaworowsky obtained the dogs sometime in January. Bruno and Susie have been spayed and neutered and their vaccinations are up to date.

He said he talked to Jaworowsky Monday about giving the dogs up, but he refused. Chaboudy said the shelter would seek custody of the dogs.

In the meantime, Bruno and Susie are "happy, friendly dogs," he said. Susie weighs about 45 pounds and Bruno is about 50 pounds. The dogs are believed to be brother and sister.

"Right now, what we're telling people is they are not ours," he said. "We do not have custody of the dogs. At this point in time we don't know when we'll have custody of them. But we are seeking custody of them."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: Florida
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: Bella_Bru
Yep. When he's finished trying we could haul him back to his garage and throw him in a metal cage. But first, we'd have to duct tape what's left of his bloody feet and hands that are worn down to the bone. Gotta be humane, you know...
41 posted on 04/23/2003 2:19:22 PM PDT by keri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru
Yes the ones I have seen are bad owners and bad breeders. The problem is that for bad owners, a pit bull puts many times more destructive power in their hands than any other breed can do. This is why there is such a striking correlation between bad owners and vicious pit bulls.

The guy in the article is just another one of those pricks for whom these dogs are not living beings but merely tools to make him feel important at the expense of the safety of his neighbors.

The core point I am trying to make here is that the danger to others, when this breed is not properly trained, is unreasonable and extreme, and dwarfs the risks inherent in poor training for other types of dogs. It's like the difference between drunk driving on a bicycle and drunk piloting a 747. Both can hurt people, but the difference in potential damage is enormous and can't be responsibly ignored. I am a staunch supporter of freedom, but I do not believe that freedom extends to being able to recklessly put your fellow man in mortal danger.

Here's some research that supports my assertion:
http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/dogbreeds.pdf

I'll quote a relevant part:
"...the data indicate that Rottweilers and pit-bull type dogs account for 67% of human DBRF in the United States... It is extremely unlikely that they accounted for anywhere near 60% of dogs in the United States in the same period, and, thus, there appears to be a breed-specific problem with fatalities."

DBRF means Dog-Bite Related Fatalities.

Here's another item of research:
http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/duip/dog50.pdf

"Alarmingly, the proportion of deaths attributable to pit bulls had increased from 20% during 1979-1980 to 67% by 1987-1988."

I'm pretty sure this isn't a figment of my fevered imagination.
42 posted on 04/23/2003 2:27:05 PM PDT by thoughtomator (I predict hysteria at the UN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
I see these dogs ALL the time, and they are inevitably accompanied by a person with a foul attitude. I constantly see them bullying other dogs in common areas, and more often than not the owners let them go at it.

That might be why there are so many news articles about them turning on their masters ----they're just getting back because of the abuse they were given. I think some dogs can be genetically mentally ill and low-class breeders breed mental illness into their strains ---but it's like German Shepherds which were once so intelligent they were the main dog used as guides for the blind but sloppy breeders began breeding the idiot dogs that they've lost their reputation for being smart dogs and now you see other breeds more often doing that work.

43 posted on 04/23/2003 2:45:19 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
There was 1 cocker spaniel bite related death in that first PDF list. How did that happen?
44 posted on 04/23/2003 2:47:51 PM PDT by Cool_V
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Cool_V
An infant victim, probably.
45 posted on 04/23/2003 2:48:57 PM PDT by thoughtomator (I predict hysteria at the UN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: j_williamsii
You are absolutely correct
46 posted on 04/23/2003 2:49:06 PM PDT by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
You are absolutely correct about dachshunds, they have a higher bite rate than pit bulls, the difference of course is in the damage that they can cause. But I love my rescued dacshund, he has one mark on his belt though.
47 posted on 04/23/2003 2:51:38 PM PDT by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: keri
Pfffft....a jerk like this does not deserve anything close to humane treatment.
48 posted on 04/23/2003 3:16:06 PM PDT by Bella_Bru (For all your tagline needs. Don't delay! Orders shipped overnight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Sloppy breeding in German Shepards has also led to ridiculously high rates of hip dysplasia too.
49 posted on 04/23/2003 3:18:04 PM PDT by Bella_Bru (For all your tagline needs. Don't delay! Orders shipped overnight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
I agree. What a horrible thing to do to a dog. That said, there should be jail time for owning pit bulls in the first place (just kidding, sorta).
50 posted on 04/23/2003 3:51:25 PM PDT by gcruse (Saddam's last words. "I can see them. I can see 72.................VIRGILS???!!!?!?!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
"One would have to be in serious denial to say that the vast majority of these dogs are used for any other purpose than violence..."

You've just proved my point by what you said. Don't you see that? You just wrote that the majority of these dogs are used for violence. Just WHO do you think is using them??? PEOPLE. The dogs don't get together and decide to demonstrate violence. They're not naturally that way. Humans use them in violent ways for their own evil purposes. Re-read what you wrote, and I think you'll see that it's the humans' fault, not the dogs. I think you need to take your "omater" off your "thoughts" and start exercising your brain in some critical thinking.
51 posted on 04/23/2003 3:58:46 PM PDT by MightyMouseToSaveThe Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
Just last week I happened to look out my kitchen window in time to see a "sweet and loving" Pit Bull kill my 13 year old cat who was sitting and minding his own business.

I hate Pit Bulls and after this incident, I am getting a gun. If I ever see another one on my property, it's dead.
52 posted on 04/23/2003 4:13:19 PM PDT by Clintons Are White Trash (Helen Thomas, Molly Ivins, Maureen Dowd - The Axis of Ugly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
You've taken things out of context to support your conclusion. I don't know if you have a fevered imagination, but the stats actually support the opposite of what you think.

The data for human DBRF from 1979 through 1996 was combined with the data from 1997 and 1998. Human DBRF were identified by searching news accounts and by use of the HSUS..

Twenty-five different breeds of dogs have been involved in more than half of the 238 human DBRF deaths the last twenty years.

Alarmingly, the proportion of deaths attributable to pit bulls had increased from 20% during 1979-1980 to 67% by 1987-1998.

Here you fail to follow up... how many deaths were they responsible for in 1979-1980? TWO, as in 2, deaths. In 1987-1988, it was 11, and then it STARTS DROPPING. You need to look at the chart to understand the percentages you have given. Remember, please, that you must also take this into account: the difficulties inherent in determining a dog's breed with certainty, and that the studies are grouping all pitbull type dogs under pitbulls...

Dog bite related deaths have held pretty steady since 1981, except for Rotties.

From the first article at the CDC: As in recent years, Rottweilers were the most commonly reported breed involved in fatal attacks, followed by pitbull-type dogs.

Did you even bother to look at the charts breaking down deaths/years from the articles you posted?

You can believe what you want, of course, but the facts do not support your belief.

53 posted on 04/23/2003 4:23:39 PM PDT by keri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Loving people don't choose the most dangerous breed of dog in existence as their pets. Only people who want to use the dog to intimidate or harm others do.

So let me get this straight... you're summarily declaring which people are "loving" and not... which breeds are dangerous or not... and what people's intentions are by the things they own.

Tell me, do you do the same thing with people? Which races are good or bad? Which things they might own to make them evil or not, like guns perhaps?

Pray tell, what study did you do or read to discover that pits are worse than fila brasilarios, dobies, dogs cross-bred with wolves, etc? Or are you just spouting off your own personal hatreds, prejudices, and baseless accusations?

(Just in case you're missing my point, you're a knee-jerk bigot, an offensive and stereotyping fool, and exactly the kind of easily-led sheep that tyrants love to have around... they call them "useful idiots".)

54 posted on 04/23/2003 5:21:29 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
Let me know when you learn how to scroll down, Einstein.
55 posted on 04/23/2003 5:51:32 PM PDT by thoughtomator (I predict hysteria at the UN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur


nobody better laugh at my shiba inu or he will throw his nylabone or squeaky cheeseburger at ya
56 posted on 04/23/2003 5:55:11 PM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: keri
My firsthand experience supports my beliefs. I have known more than one person who has chosen a pit bull for the explicit purpose of using it as a weapon. I'm rather astonished to meet such disagreement here, it seems to me to be obvious that is the only reason for a person to want that kind of dog rather than a different breed.

To me, this is the kind of flat-out obvious thing in the category of (to make a current-events analogy) saying that anti-Western terrorists are pretty much all radicalized Muslims. Yeah you'll find a well-behaved and loving pit bull on occasion, just as you'll find a non-Muslim terrorist every so often. But it's rare, and an exception that emphasizes the rule.

The question that I can't find a satisfactory answer to is this:

If the dog is not intended for use as a weapon, why would any person ever choose a pit bull over another breed?
57 posted on 04/23/2003 6:26:21 PM PDT by thoughtomator (I predict hysteria at the UN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
I will give you an honest answer, although you assume far too much to deserve one.

It's a look, something in the behavior or particular personality of the pup or dog. What is that makes a person click with a certain dog whatever the breed?

Some people don't have to pick a breed. They pick a dog to love and care for and are loved in return.

I would think other people would choose a pitbull simply because they love the breed's qualities, as I do. And you are wrong. Good dogs are not rare within the breed. Just the opposite.

58 posted on 04/23/2003 6:54:23 PM PDT by keri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
Hmmm, someone needs to get together with this guy in a small room and bust both his legs, then order him to stand up and walk around, beating him with a nightstick repeatedly when he doesn't. Then ask him how he liked his training session.
59 posted on 04/23/2003 7:48:59 PM PDT by Free Vulcan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Well, Nostradamus, your "study" lumps Rottweilers and "pit-bull type dogs"... not very breed specific for pit bulls, and aggregates figures for several different breeds. How does that definitively place one specific breed from the non-specific list (other than Rotties) so far above and beyond the others? If anything, it seems to indicate that Rotties are a bigger part of the picture than the pit bulls you are trying to demonize.

Also, your (again unsupported) contention that pit bulls present much more "potential damage" than other breeds of dogs is just plain silly. I watched a great dane tear the wheel well off of a Fiero to get to an escaping cat. Pit bulls don't tear and remove, they latch on and hold. Would you rather have your muscle tissue perforated... or removed? Which represents more "potential damage"?

60 posted on 04/23/2003 8:31:02 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson