Skip to comments.
Mobile Bio Lab Found!
Fox News ^
| 4-8-2003
| FOX
Posted on 04/10/2003 12:09:57 PM PDT by vannrox
Just breaking! On Fox now.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bio; germ; illegalweappons; iraq; iraqifreedom; lab; marines; mobilebioweapons; roachcoach; saddam; usmc; war; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 321-324 next last
To: Steve_Seattle
It does not sound like they are describing a 'lab' as such, but rather a distribution point for biologicals. They could use this to possibly fill other delivery systems or, depending on the setup, they could spray or release directly from this vehicle while either rolling or stationary.
81
posted on
04/10/2003 12:34:01 PM PDT
by
Route66
(America's Mainstreet)
To: jim35
The proof is in the Putin...... (?)
82
posted on
04/10/2003 12:34:07 PM PDT
by
tracer
(/b>)
To: Fresh Wind
Would that be the SAM launched at the Kuwaiti Mall?
83
posted on
04/10/2003 12:34:26 PM PDT
by
mabelkitty
((Don't paste my posts to DU))
To: kidd
It's just an ice cream truck containing the flavor of the month, radioactive rasberry.
Anthrax Ripple?
Crunchy Frog?Or just plain ol' Ricin Cream maybe?
84
posted on
04/10/2003 12:34:34 PM PDT
by
arasina
("Thank you Mister Bush!" [direct quote from liberated Iraqi man])
To: mabelkitty
LOL! Will that be butter pecan or chocolate swirl?
To: vannrox
Just your mobile pesticide lab. Got to keep the fleas off the camels in the caravan.....
86
posted on
04/10/2003 12:34:50 PM PDT
by
Calamari
To: Cyber Liberty
The story I posted last night was from a reputable SA newspaper and was big news down there. No reason whatsoever to pull it.
To: antaresequity
You have a good point, and you might be right that the vehicle was used to load chemical / bio munitions into shells. But...
First off, It is designed to be exempt from UN inspections. So, ergo, it is involved in some kind of violation of the UN resolutions.
I understand that Bio-Labs can be pretty small. The articles that I had read discussed tracker trailer sized rigs with only one half of the rig avail for the lab. Most reports stated that the lab could be the size of a suitcase if they wanted to make it that small. Great Washington Post article on this a while back.
THe informant for the vehicle described it as a mobile Bio Lab.
The Military who investigated this described it as a mobile lab.
88
posted on
04/10/2003 12:35:28 PM PDT
by
vannrox
(The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
To: browardchad
Would a vehicle like this ever be needed for use with conventional warheads?
To: vannrox
Info from fox is clear...
Hardly. It sounds as though a film of a mobile lab has been discovered, not a mobile lab per se.
To: headsonpikes
Rubbish!! These units were for ensuring product safety at the Baby Milk Factories. I read it in the papers. The LA Times or the NY Times?
91
posted on
04/10/2003 12:36:25 PM PDT
by
John123
To: steve-b
Don't forget: Nuclear Neopolitan, Crunchy Frog, and Cesium Suprise!
92
posted on
04/10/2003 12:36:57 PM PDT
by
jriemer
(We are a Republic not a Democracy)
To: Lucas1
No. It will not be a production lab. If it is bio, then it is a LOADER facility. It merely transfers bios from bulk storage containers to warheads.
It requires containment, cooling and and the ability to handle containers, measure and load.
That can all be done in a small vehicle.
This vehicle does not at all look like the diagrams of the mobile production facilities which required 3 full-size tractor trailer vehicles for each facility.
To: The_Victor
Make mine Iraqi Road.....
94
posted on
04/10/2003 12:37:43 PM PDT
by
tracer
(/b>)
To: Eastbound
Your graphics remind me of when we went into Afghanistan and all the news programs were showing what they thought the underground "Caves" looked like. They showed rooms, weapons, fuel, cots, even tractor trailers hiding in them. Later in Tora Bora they showed soldiers squeezing through tiny openings in some of them.
To: Mr_Peter
You haven't been around for long, have you Pushi. If Jim don't like your thread, it's gone. Do it too many times, and you're gone. 95% of the threads here aren't worth diddly dick, and rational argument isn't allowed unless it fits within the 9 dots. Sooooo...don't contribute. And yet you signed up 1997-12-10 with a profile number of 416 and are still around.
96
posted on
04/10/2003 12:38:07 PM PDT
by
techcor
To: Sir Gawain
Hey, I dunno. I'm not a mod (I'd be known as "Mod the Terrible because I'd have an itchy Zot finger).
97
posted on
04/10/2003 12:38:35 PM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2003, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: arasina
>Or just plain ol' Ricin Cream maybe?
Rum Ricin? . . .
To: Pushi
}So, we now have censorship on FR? And they want our contributions?
Nothing new about that. You may not notice it until your ox is gored.
99
posted on
04/10/2003 12:38:51 PM PDT
by
DensaMensa
(He who controls the definitions controls History. He who controls History controls the future.)
To: mabelkitty
Doubtful. That was, supposedly, a Chinese cruise missile (or a copy of one). Different animal.
100
posted on
04/10/2003 12:39:06 PM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
(Never forget: CLINTON PARDONED TERRORISTS)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 321-324 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson