Skip to comments.
THEY SHAME NEW YORK
New York Post ^
| 3/15/03
Posted on 03/15/2003 2:04:16 AM PST by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:12:42 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
March 15, 2003 -- With hundreds of thousands of young soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines about to put their lives on the line for America, the New York City Council this week embraced the bloody-handed despot of Baghdad, Saddam Hussein.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS:
1
posted on
03/15/2003 2:04:16 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
And that this leads to embarrassing moments - such as when the thoroughly noxious Charles Barron of Brooklyn last fall lionized Zimbabwe's murderous president, Robert Mugabe. The same Charles Barron who said he wanted to reach out and slap the nearest white guy at the "Reparations Rally" in DC last year, I believe.
2
posted on
03/15/2003 2:15:35 AM PST
by
leadpenny
To: kattracks
Hardcore liberals actually take comfort in death and destruction of others because they are godless, so by default their god is the destroyer Satan. Thats why Saddam is so appealing to many of them. Only when they fear God, can true wisdom and understanding about the nature of good and evil become clear. They are the blind leading the blind as long as they follow the prince of darkness through their ignorance.
3
posted on
03/15/2003 3:05:40 AM PST
by
Russell Scott
((Saddam, beware the Ides of March))
To: kattracks
what a change from Rudy to Bloomberg
4
posted on
03/15/2003 3:16:50 AM PST
by
The Wizard
(Demonrats are enemies of America)
To: leadpenny
Let him go to Saddam and slap him for mental health and see what kind of reception he gets there.
To: kattracks
It's hard to believe these people refuse to learn a lesson from 11 Sept. 2001. And after the outpouring of love and money from across the nation following that awful day, it's a slap in the face to millions of Americans. They should be ashamed.
To: kattracks
What is Mrs. Clinton's position on this resolution? HMMMM?
No, answer the question, you little witch.
7
posted on
03/15/2003 3:42:14 AM PST
by
fightinJAG
(Scouts Out!)
To: fightinJAG
(Of course, "little witch" was referring to the Hildebeast, not our dear kattracks)
8
posted on
03/15/2003 3:43:17 AM PST
by
fightinJAG
(Scouts Out!)
To: libertylover
Your post is essentially what I said when I called my councilman's office to register my opposition. I knew it was a waste of time, because my councilman was one of the sponsors of the resolution.
I added that, along with losing the good will of the nation, they could probably expect to lose a lot of tourist revenue as a direct result of this nonsense.
You know what the girl taking my call said?
"It's only a resolution, you know..."
To: leadpenny
I guess New York likes being the target of terror and death given the fact that this is the kind of trash they elected to rule over, serve and "protect" them.
I will be taking the Big Apple off my travel plans because I and my family do not want to be around when our enemies see that NYC, with the blessing of it's leadership, is now more than ever, a TARGET RICH ENVIRONMENT OF OPPORTUNITY for weapons if mass destruction and murder.
...Simply tragic but as the man said, "you get what you pay for" and you reap what you sow.
To: kattracks
I don't even want to post what I think.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson