Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Radical Islam is sanitized for American textbooks
tallahassee.com ^ | Posted on Fri, Feb. 21, 2003 | Suzanne Fields

Posted on 02/23/2003 5:50:42 PM PST by Destro

Posted on Fri, Feb. 21, 2003

Radical Islam is sanitized for American textbooks

By Suzanne Fields

WASHINGTON TIMES

One man's jihad can be another man's mission of distortion. The Islamist terrorists who attacked America on Sept. 11 cited their murderous rampage as a "jihad." The suicide bombers who terrorize Israeli schools, restaurants and malls called their mission their "jihad." But American school kids might never know anything about it.

A lot has gone missing in our textbooks. "Patterns of History," for example, published by Houghton Mifflin and adopted as a world history textbook in high school classes in Texas and many other states, never even mentions the word.

A seventh-grade world history book by Houghton Mifflin, titled "Across the Centuries," defines "jihad" merely as a struggle for a Muslim "to do one's best to resist temptation and overcome evil." There's no mention of the fact that millions of Muslims - not all, but many millions - are taught to regard anything not under Muslim rule or control as "evil".

"Islam and the Textbooks," a 35-page report compiled by the American Textbook Council in New York, analyzes seven history textbooks widely used between the seventh and 12th grades and finds that millions of American schoolchildren are being cheated of accurate history. Politically correct advocacy groups have thoroughly intimidated teachers, administrators and school boards - and in a way that the most fundamentalist of Christians or the most orthodox of Jews never could.

Textbooks are big money. Publishers cower at the prospect of offending anyone with a megaphone, and the advocacy groups are skilled at manipulating the timid and the cowardly with easy accusations of "bigot" and "racist." Uninformed and uncritical teachers pass on their own ignorance with appeals to mushy sentiment disguised as tolerance.

Parents who think textbooks are written by fair but tough-minded scholars are unaware of how political process, not scholarship, produces their children's textbooks. There is neither understanding nor recognition of the distortion of Islam by radical Muslims and how they use this distortion to make war on America - and indeed on the millions of peaceful Muslims who do not share their distorted theology.

"On significant Islam-related subjects, textbooks omit, flatter, embellish and resort to happy talk, suspending criticism or harsh judgments that would raise provocative or even alarming questions," writes Gilbert Sewall, a former professor who heads the American Textbook Council (www.historytextbooks.org/islam).

You wouldn't even learn how Islamists frequently describe jihad in military terms, using passages from the Quran. Bernard Lewis, the author and scholar, says that "the object of jihad is to bring the whole world under Islamic law." You won't find this view, though widely shared by scholars, even acknowledged in the politically correct texts.

There's no acknowledgment that religious dogma is dictated by certain Islamic states, how freedom of religion and speech are alien concepts in most Islamic countries. Double standards are the norm in these textbooks; Judaism and Christianity get short shrift, as do Western secular institutions. Slavery is often presented as a peculiarly European and American institution. One text does not even mention that Islamic civilizations engaged in the slave trade. In another, where slavery is acknowledged, it's treated as a "benign institution" offering slaves the opportunity for "social mobility."

Textbooks that robustly discuss the awful condition of women that once prevailed in the West present severe contemporary restrictions on Islamic women as benign. "For some women," one textbook states, "the (hijab, or veil) symbolized resistance to unpopular governments."

A "bridal fair" of the Berbers in Morocco is portrayed as a quaint ritual of happy natives enjoying the party, without noting that fathers sell their daughters to their prospective husbands through negotiations over dowries. Upper-class women may be secluded in the home, but "in rural areas, peasant women continued to contribute to the economy in many ways." (Aren't they the lucky ones?)

The exceptional women in Islamic society who achieved great knowledge and power, such as Shajar, a 13th century freed slave who is said to have become a ruler of Egypt, are presented as typical. Maisuna, a Bedouin poetess, is portrayed in one text as a proto-feminist (sort of like Gloria Steinem in a burqa).

The Council on Islamic Education in Orange County, Calif., is particularly intimidating to publishers. It has warned scholars and public officials that those who do not see eye-to-eye with its positions will be cited as racists, reactionaries and enemies of Islam. High-profile publishers and editors eagerly seek the council's imprimatur.

The American Textbook Council says the distortions, inaccuracies and omissions in the study of Islam are the result of complacency, not anti-Americanism. But its report suggests something worse than complacency is at work. It's the cheating of our children. The rest of us are cheated, too.

Contact Suzanne Fields at sfields1000@aol.com.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: culture; current; education; history; islam; politics; textbooks; theology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 02/23/2003 5:50:42 PM PST by Destro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Destro
I tried a few months ago to find a scholarly book on the Islamic religion from a "secular" analytical point of view that seemed worth reading in Borders and Amazon. I failed. There does not seem to be one. Western culture simply has not been interested, clearly, and I suspect that almost no one is qualified, such is the cultural divide.
2 posted on 02/23/2003 6:01:23 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
The Council on Islamic Education in Orange County, Calif., is particularly intimidating to publishers. It has warned scholars and public officials that those who do not see eye-to-eye with its positions will be cited as racists, reactionaries and enemies of Islam. High-profile publishers and editors eagerly seek the council's imprimatur.

There you have it folks, all in a nutshell...The idea of our forefathers, in their wisdom, being raped in front of our eyes.

I am so sick of this shit that I'm....I'm....AAARRRGGGHHH!

FMCDH

3 posted on 02/23/2003 6:17:51 PM PST by nothingnew (the pendulum always swings back and the socialists are now in the pit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
What is the Koran? Researchers with a variety of academic and theological interests are proposing controversial theories about the Koran and Islamic history, and are striving to reinterpret Islam for the modern world. This is, as one scholar puts it, a "sensitive business"
4 posted on 02/23/2003 6:21:13 PM PST by Destro (Fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nothingnew
bump
5 posted on 02/23/2003 6:21:54 PM PST by Destro (Fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Torie
I tried a few months ago to find a scholarly book on the Islamic religion from a "secular" analytical point of view that seemed worth reading...

Read David Pryce-Jones's book The Closed Circle.

6 posted on 02/23/2003 6:25:16 PM PST by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: valkyrieanne
The Quran is just the work of one man in Saudi Arabia, who said he met with an angel. In the USA, we have people in mental institutions who claim to have seen so many things, so why would any person with a sane mind believe this?
Mohammed wanted to be greater than Jesus Christ, and teaches that one day, Jesus will follow him. It is unbelievable how so many go deceived. Just unbelievable!
To make things worse, Islam has people killed who were born in to a Muslim family, and who do not choose to follow this cultish belief. Islam brainwashes people by trying to control every aspect of their lives, even how they go to the toilet.
7 posted on 02/23/2003 6:33:50 PM PST by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Thanks for the link. The interplay between theology and society is an endlessly fascinating topic for me. Religions do change their emphases over time as conditions change. Mormans have been about that business at warp speed as far as I can tell. They will not be deflected from their larger mission by getting bogged down in cul de sacs from which there is no satisfactory exit. The problem with Islam may be less to do with Islam, and more to do with its host societies. In the end, religion is successful and good to the extent it resonantes with its culture while hewing to and successfully propagating and inculcating truths which are universal. That is my off the cuff opinion.
8 posted on 02/23/2003 6:46:31 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: valkyrieanne
Is this a slam on Arabs, or Islam, or neither or both? I am looking for something sober and balanced, and not necessarily deflected by Arab nueroses.
9 posted on 02/23/2003 6:48:12 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Destro
This is so disturbing! Thanks for the thread Destro.
10 posted on 02/23/2003 6:52:53 PM PST by MeekMom (( Please visit http://CNLGLFG.com) (HUGE Ann-Fan!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
We know that the Saudi's have been forking over massive greenbacks in a covert public relations and lobbying campaign because Congressman Dan Burton of Illinois has been locked in a struggle to wrest information, from American public relations firms, clouded under the Vienna conventions shield of diplomatic immunity.

Dan Burton's office stated that, "To date, the three Washington based lobbying firms of Qorvis Communications, Patton Boggs, LLP, and the Gallagher Group, have refused to comply with Congressional subpoenas and have claimed that under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, their documents are "archives and documents" of the Saudi Embassy, and are thus "inviolable." Chairman Burton believes there is no precedent for this claim of privilege. Furthermore, the Chairman believes that the claim of privilege, if allowed to stand, would have disastrous consequences for law enforcement investigations of terrorism and espionage." A fine line exists between a Madison Avenue fat cat and turncoat.

Did you know that presently money from the Saudi Royal family has been heading into your public library. The message inbound to our public libraries may be temperate but its aim resides in moderating both our understanding of and our perceptions regarding a retrogressive and vehement Anti-American agenda.


Our public libraries might not have the insight to refuse a camouflaged gift from the evil Saudi "Prince" Alwaleed. We cannot expect our local librarian, no matter how sweet, to be as alert as Rudy Giuliani when he refused the same blood money given with the caveat that the Unites States "should re-examine its policies in the Middle East."

These examples are but a few of how Saudi Arabia can use our own values and systems against us. These are the same people who were adept enough to profit in the stock market because they knew 9-11 was going to happen in advance. The family of evil are masters in this subterfuge and we are silent conspirators

11 posted on 02/23/2003 6:54:20 PM PST by wepollock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wepollock
The family of evil are masters in this subterfuge and we are silent conspirators

George Lucas should hire you to write the script for his next movie.
12 posted on 02/23/2003 7:06:53 PM PST by Belial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Click my link-scholarly and everything.
13 posted on 02/23/2003 7:17:48 PM PST by Destro (Fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Destro
I read you link and enjoyed it, for which I thank you again.
14 posted on 02/23/2003 7:19:22 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Torie
ISLAM UNVEILED by Robert Spencer is great. I just finished it. He lays out why Islam can't ever go secular, and why they can't ever leave their militant ways.
15 posted on 02/23/2003 7:24:17 PM PST by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Now all we have to do is get the Imans in Mecca to sanitize Islam ...
16 posted on 02/23/2003 7:31:00 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Religions do change their emphases over time as conditions change.

Do they? But for those then contemporarily prized possessions that may have been coveted by other ancient Hebrews,
how have The Ten Commandments changed over such time?

17 posted on 02/23/2003 7:33:01 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
Universal truths don't change much. From whence such come is beyond my pay grade, but I subscribe to them, and try to live by them, as best I can. As I get older it gets easier, because moral behavior is largely a matter of habit. I might have trimmed for convenience in my salad days. I trim less now I would like to think.
18 posted on 02/23/2003 7:40:59 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Torie
The problem with Islam may be less to do with Islam, and more to do with its host societies.

No, the problem is with Islam. Read The Sword of the Prophet, Islam Unveiled, or Why I am not a Muslim.

Islam has a number of basic requirements which dogmatically drive it toward fundamentalism. The few secular Islamic nations have succeeded by ignoring what Islam requires.

In the end, religion is successful and good to the extent it resonates with its culture while hewing to and successfully propagating and inculcating truths which are universal.

A typically generous interpretation of religion in general by someone raised in the liberal democratic west. I commend you for your charity, which has--unfortunately--nothing to do with Islam. The thought process is something like this: Judeo-Christian law and Hellenistic culture has produced a tolerant and equitable society. Therefore religion is good. Therefore, all religions are good. Therefore, in particular, Islam is good.

This isn't reasoning, it's wishful thinking. Read the Koran, read the Examples, read the history of the first four Caliphates and finally, read the story of Mohammed's life. You will be truly astounded at how vicious, intolerant, and degrading this "religion" is.

As an agnostic, I often get into discussions with Evangelical Christians. Sometimes here at FR. It's challenging, frustrating, and occasionally quite hostile, but I'm sure happy that I live in a country dominated by Christians. In an Islamic country, I would need to hide my beliefs, or die.

Apologists like to point to the Crusades, the Inquisition, the 100-Years War, Internecine fighting in Northern Ireland, etc, etc. But there's a significant difference between these and the crimes of Islam: the people doing those things weren't actually practicing Christianity. The people perpetrating the massacres of the Caliphate, the Ottoman Turks, the enslavement of modern Christians in Sudan, the suicide/homicide bombers, and on and on and on, are actually practicing Islam.

We often ask, "Why the lack of denunciations for 9/11 by moderate Islamic clerics?" The question is predicated on the mistaken belief that these crimes run against Islam. They don't. They are supported enthusiastically in the Koran and illustrated in the life and actions of Mohammed.

Know your enemy, my friend. Off the cuff opinions and generous platitudes are not going to help us win this war.

It's not useful for practical or propagandistic purposes to say that we're at war with Islam. But we are. And we are at war with Islam, not by choice, but because Islam is at war with mankind.

19 posted on 02/23/2003 7:43:47 PM PST by FredZarguna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna
I am looking for a heavyweight and balanced text that parses these issues. I don't want tendentiousness or polemics. I know that Islam was once more pluralistic in practice. I want to know the shades of grey. If you know of such a text, let me know. I will not rush to judgment on such an important matter. I do appreciate that Islam has certain systemic problems because it has no mediating institutions at present, and resides in countries without any tradition of a free press, or free thought, and thus the most charismatic and fundamentalist ranters have a rather free reign without check. But that is part of the point. Islam may be suffering in intellectual respectibility because it resides in the wrong zip codes.
20 posted on 02/23/2003 7:55:02 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson