Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Comments by President Bush re. Iraq (02-18-03)
The White House ^ | 02-18-03 | W

Posted on 02/18/2003 8:40:53 AM PST by erk

Q & A following the swearing in of the new SEC Chairman Bill Donaldson:

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. Ron, I'll answer a couple of questions here.

Q Thank you, Mr. President. What do you make of the fact that millions of people across the globe have taken to the streets to protest your approach to Iraq? And if you decide to go to war, how do you wage a campaign in the face of such stiff opposition?

THE PRESIDENT: Two points, one is that democracy is a beautiful thing, and that people are allowed to express their opinion. I welcome people's right to say what they believe. Secondly, evidently some of the world don't view Saddam Hussein as a risk to peace. I respectfully disagree. Saddam Hussein has gassed his own people. Saddam Hussein has got weapons of mass destruction. Saddam Hussein has made -- defied the United Nations. Saddam Hussein is providing links to terrorists. Saddam Hussein is a threat to America. And we will deal with him.

You know, I -- war is my last choice. But the risk of doing nothing is even a worst option as far as I'm concerned. I owe it to the American people to secure this country. I will do so.

Q Have you decided how to do so yet?

THE PRESIDENT: Pardon me?

Q Have you decided how you're going to deal with him yet?

THE PRESIDENT: Hopefully, Saddam Hussein will disarm.

Q Mr. President --

THE PRESIDENT: If he chooses not to disarm, as I have been saying for a long time, Ron, we'll lead a coalition of the willing to disarm him.

Steve.

Q Should a second resolution on Iraq include a deadline? And how are you going to get around the opposition from France, Russia and China?

THE PRESIDENT: We're working with our friends. As I said, a second resolution would be useful. We don't need a second resolution. It's clear this guy could even care less about the first resolution. He's in total defiance of 1441. But we want to work with our friends and allies to see if we can get a second resolution. That's what we're doing right now.

Q With a deadline?

THE PRESIDENT: We're working with our friends and allies right now to -- how best to get a resolution out of the United Nations. As I say, it would be helpful to get one out. It's not necessary, as far as I'm concerned.

Q Mr. President, are you any closer to an aid package for Turkey, particularly given the continued problems with NATO regarding any defense of Turkey?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, first of all, as you know NATO did -- did express their desire to help Turkey. And I appreciate the NATO allies. I also appreciate the EU statement yesterday that Saddam Hussein needs to fully disarm. I thought those were positive developments. We're working closely with the Turks. And, you know, we got great respect for the Turkish government. They've got -- had no better friend than the American government. And hopefully we can come up with an agreement that's satisfactory to both parties. We're still working it.

Yes, Bill?

Q Mr. President, would it be easier to win the peace after the war in Iraq -- if there is one -- if you had the allies with you going in? And what about the idea of an ultimatum for Saddam, another last chance?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, you mean another, another, another last chance? He knows my feelings. And that is he needs to disarm -- completely, totally disarm. Listen, he's a fellow that likes to buy time by -- through deception and delay. He believes time is on his side. After all, he was quoted in an Egyptian newspaper saying all he's got to do is stall and defy the world and, you know, coalitions will fall apart. I am determined to keep the peace. I'm determined to hold this man to account.

And there's two reasons why. One, we have the obligation, I have the obligation, this administration has the obligation to do everything we can to protect the American people. Secondly, I think it's very important for the United Nations to be useful, as we go out into the future. And there's nothing less useful than issuing a resolution and then not upholding the resolution.

I mean, after all, I want to remind the people that this man has been in defiance of resolution after resolution after resolution after resolution, for 12 long years. And I think unless the United Nations shows some backbone and courage, it will render the -- it could render the Security Council irrelevant. And that's a danger, in dealing with the new threats that the civilized world faces. We face terrorism, we face the idea of people having nuclear arms, we face people who have got weapons of mass destruction. We face these deadly terrorist networks teaming up with countries with weapons of mass destruction who could attack any time.

Those are the threats of the 21st century. The best way to deal with those threats is to have international organizations which are effective. And if the United Nations can't enforce its own resolutions -- a resolution which, by the way, has been around for 12 years -- it says something about its utility as we head into the future.

I want the United Nations to be effective body. I think it's in our country's interest that it be effective. And we'll see whether or not it's got the capacity to be effective.

Anne.

Q Given the size of the protests in England over the weekend, do you have any concerns that Tony Blair might pay a serious political price for supporting you on Iraq?

THE PRESIDENT: I think any time somebody shows courage, when it comes to peace, that the people will eventually understand that.

First of all, you know, size of protest, it's like deciding, well, I'm going to decide policy based upon a focus group. The role of a leader is to decide policy based upon the security -- in this case, the security of the people. Tony Blair understands that Saddam Hussein is a risk. Tony Blair sees that, you know, a weakened United Nations is not good for world peace. And he is a courageous leader and I'm proud to call him friend.

Another courageous leader is coming to the ranch this weekend, Jose Maria Aznar. I'm looking forward to having a good meeting with him. These are men of vision. They see the task at hand. And I'm proud to call them allies. We'll work together for the sake of peace.

Listen, thank you all very much.

END 10:36 A.M. EST


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 02/18/2003 8:40:53 AM PST by erk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: erk
Another courageous leader is coming to the ranch this weekend, Jose Maria Aznar. I'm looking forward to having a good meeting with him. These are men of vision. They see the task at hand. And I'm proud to call them allies. We'll work together for the sake of peace.

Jose Maria Aznar, president of Spain

2 posted on 02/18/2003 8:51:54 AM PST by thinktwice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thinktwice
Aznar needs to rid that 'stache. He looks like a dirty car saleman.
3 posted on 02/18/2003 8:53:39 AM PST by smith288 (Singes qui capitulent et mangent du fromage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: erk
Clinton wasn't able to meet the press like Bush can, since Clinton was always dodging questions about his personal problems, and Bush doesn't have any!
4 posted on 02/18/2003 8:54:07 AM PST by buffyt (Nach Frankreich: Sprechen Sie Deutsches? Nein? Bitte Schön.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erk
"First of all, you know, size of protest, it's like deciding, well, I'm going to decide policy based upon a focus group."

He swings, he hits, it's going long....It's outa here!

5 posted on 02/18/2003 8:57:00 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Islamofascism sucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buffyt
"Aren't you willing to give peace a chance??"


6 posted on 02/18/2003 8:58:56 AM PST by ErnBatavia ((Bumperootus!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: erk
Mr. President, would it be easier to win the peace after the war in Iraq -- if there is one -- if you had the allies with you going in?Arrrrgggghhhhh!!!! This is the argument that is REALLY getting my dander up...last time I checked, the score was 16-3 in OUR FAVOR!!!!
7 posted on 02/18/2003 9:06:06 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erk
I mean, after all, I want to remind the people that this man has been in defiance of resolution after resolution after resolution after resolution, for 12 long years. And I think unless the United Nations shows some backbone and courage, it will render the -- it could render the Security Council irrelevant.

...And if the United Nations can't enforce its own resolutions -- a resolution which, by the way, has been around for 12 years -- it says something about its utility as we head into the future.

...First of all, you know, size of protest, it's like deciding, well, I'm going to decide policy based upon a focus group

Wow! Two, two slams (UN & Clinton) in one!

8 posted on 02/18/2003 9:06:32 AM PST by NorCoGOP (No more Saddam, know more peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erk
Thanks for posting this.
9 posted on 02/18/2003 9:09:29 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buffyt
I think that jibe about "focus groups" was a none-too-subtle jab at Clinton by the current Commander-in-Chief.

10 posted on 02/18/2003 9:14:12 AM PST by UncleSamUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
Ern:
Not to be critical of you or anything, but could you please give us a fair warning the next time you put up a photo of that "creature from the black lagoon". I almost lost my lunch.
11 posted on 02/18/2003 9:15:49 AM PST by UncleSamUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brad Cloven
"First of all, you know, size of protest, it's like deciding, well, I'm going to decide policy based upon a focus group. The role of a leader is to decide policy based upon the security -- in this case, the security of the people. "

OUTSTANDING!!!, Mr. President

12 posted on 02/18/2003 9:22:51 AM PST by NonValueAdded ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." GWB 9/20/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
LOL! LOL!!! Helen Thomas alert! Code Orange moving to Code Red! Ahoogahh ahoogah!

Prairie

13 posted on 02/18/2003 9:46:20 AM PST by prairiebreeze (Who would have anticipated Germany and France to be the entity that is doing the de-stabilizing!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson