Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq relinquishes disarm panel chair
UPI ^ | February 14, 2003 | William M. Reilly

Posted on 02/14/2003 9:20:29 PM PST by Indy Pendance

UNITED NATIONS, Feb. 14 (UPI) -- A U.N. spokesman Friday night said, without explanation, that Iraq has relinquished its four-week turn as president of the Geneva-based Conference on Disarmament, making way for Ireland to take up the slack.

"The Iraqi Mission to the United Nations informed the Secretary-General today that the Iraqi government had sent a letter to the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva saying that they would not be assuming the rotating presidency of the Conference, which they were scheduled to assume on March 17," said the spokesman, Fred Eckhard.

Iraq had been scheduled to take over from Iran, which also suddenly bowed out as head of the world's sole multilateral forum for disarmament negotiations, represented by 66 states.

Ireland's term heading the Conference begins, coincidentally, on St. Patrick's Day.

The conference opened this year's session at the U.N.'s Palais des Nations in Geneva Jan. 21 under the presidency of Ambassador Rakesh Sood, of India.

Following in the presidential rotation were to be, in English alphabetical order, Indonesia, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Ireland, and Israel.

But Iran dropped out last month, moving up Iraq a notch. Now, Baghdad has bowed out, putting Ireland in the seat on March 17, St. Patrick's Day, Ireland's national day.

At least the Conference finally agreed on an agenda.

According to its rules of procedure, the Conference "shall adopt its agenda for the year at the beginning of the session. In doing so, the Conference shall take into account the recommendations made to it by the U.N. General Assembly, the proposals by its members, and decisions of the conference."

Last year the Conference was not able to reach agreement on a program of work -- the fourth consecutive year during which it was unable to do so -- and so was unable to start work on substantive issues.

While there was agreement on most of the elements of a program, the main differences remained on the matter of prevention of an arms race in outer space.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 02/14/2003 9:20:29 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Well, this is interesting.
2 posted on 02/14/2003 9:22:43 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Isn't it? How is this going to play out?
3 posted on 02/14/2003 9:23:33 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Last year the Conference was not able to reach agreement on a program of work -- the fourth consecutive year during which it was unable to do so -- and so was unable to start work on substantive issues.

4 Years they haven't done squat???

4 posted on 02/14/2003 9:24:10 PM PST by Mo1 (I HATE The Party of Clinton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
International policy, gotta love it.
5 posted on 02/14/2003 9:25:09 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
[UNITED NATIONS, Feb. 14 (UPI) -- A U.N. spokesman Friday night said, without explanation, that Iraq has relinquished its four-week turn as president of the Geneva-based Conference on Disarmament, making way for Ireland to take up the slack.] Well dang. Don't they have a sense of humor? I was looking forward to many "Animal Farm" moments over the next four weeks. Like putting Joseph Mengele in charge of the Council of Humanitarian Affairs, or Castro in charge of the Council on Economic Development. Let the UN commit suicide in our time. LOLOLOL.
6 posted on 02/14/2003 9:26:32 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Iraq had been scheduled to take over from Iran, which also suddenly bowed out as head of the world's sole multilateral forum for disarmament negotiations, represented by 66 states.

Gotta love that U.N.

7 posted on 02/14/2003 9:27:36 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
"Iraq relinquishes disarm panel chair"

They know they will be on the run by then

8 posted on 02/14/2003 9:27:46 PM PST by Hannibal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; JeanS
The Conference on Disarmament (CD) established in 1979 as the single multilateral disarmament negotiating forum of the international community, was a result of the first Special Session on Disarmament of the United Nations General Assembly held in 1978. It succeeded other Geneva-based negotiating fora, which include the Ten-Nation Committee on Disarmament (1960), the Eighteen-Nation Committee on Disarmament (1962-68), and the Conference of the Committee on Disarmament (1969-78).

[more]

9 posted on 02/14/2003 9:28:25 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance; Miss Marple; Dog; Howlin; MJY1288; rintense; Brad's Gramma; ABG(anybody but Gore); ..
How interesting!
10 posted on 02/14/2003 9:35:08 PM PST by kayak (God bless President Bush, God bless our military, and God bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
TREATY ON THE NON-PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS

Article I
Each nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to transfer to any recipient whatsoever nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or control over such weap-ons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly; and not in any way to assist, encourage, or

induce any non-nuclear-weapon State to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices, or control over such weapons or explosive devices.

Article II
Each non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to receive the transfer from any transferor whatsoever of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or of control over such weapons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly; not to manufacture or

otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices; and not to seek or receive any assistance in the manufacture of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.

Article III
1. Each non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes to accept safeguards, as set forth in an agreement to be negotiated and concluded with the International Atomic Energy

Agency in accordance with the Statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency and the Agency's safeguards system, for the exclusive purpose of verification of the fulfilment of its obligations assumed under this Treaty with a view to preventing diversion of nuclear energy from peaceful uses to nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices. Procedures for the safeguards required by this Article shall be followed with respect to source or special fissionable material whether it is being produced, processed or used in any principal nuclear facility or is outside any such facility. The safeguards required by this Article shall be applied on all source or special fissionable material in all peaceful nuclear activities within the terri-tory of such State, under its jurisdiction, or carried out under its control anywhere.

2. Each State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to provide: (a) source or special fissionable material, or (b) equipment or material especially designed or prepared for the processing, use or production of special fissionable material, to any non-nuclear-weapon State for peaceful purposes, unless the source or special fissionable material shall be subject to the safeguards required by this Article.

3. The safeguards required by this Article shall be implemented in a manner designed to comply with Article IV of this Treaty, and to avoid hampering the economic or technological development of the Parties or international co-operation in the field of peaceful nuclear ac-tivities, including the international exchange of nuclear material and equipment for the process-ing, use or production of nuclear material for peaceful purposes in accordance with the pro-visions of this Article and the principle of safeguarding set forth in the Preamble of the Treaty.

4. Non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty shall conclude agreements with the Inter-national Atomic Energy Agency to meet the requirements of this Article either individually or together with other States in accordance with the Statute of the International Atomic En-ergy Agency. Negotiation of such agreements shall commence within 180 days from the original entry into force of this Treaty. For States depositing their instruments of ratification or accession after the 180-day period, negotiation of such agreements shall commence not later than the date of such deposit. Such agreements shall enter into force not later than eighteen months after the date of initiation of negotiations.

[more]

11 posted on 02/14/2003 9:36:54 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
The Iraqi Mission to the United Nations informed the Secretary-General today that the Iraqi government had sent a letter to the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva saying that they would not be assuming the rotating presidency of the Conference, which they were scheduled to assume on March 17

That's because you're be assuming room temperature by then.

12 posted on 02/14/2003 9:43:19 PM PST by Liberal Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
While there was agreement on most of the elements of a program, the main differences remained on the matter of prevention of an arms race in outer space

They're worried about arms in outer space while not the least bit concerned with the massive proliferation of illegal arms right here on earth. The UN has got to be the biggest joke in the world.

13 posted on 02/14/2003 9:45:23 PM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
You get the feeling there were other reasons Iran and Iraq backed out?
14 posted on 02/14/2003 9:46:02 PM PST by Mo1 (I HATE The Party of Clinton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Definately. I'm still digesting this information. Read the treaty. Very telling.
15 posted on 02/14/2003 9:46:55 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
if the UN had found some backbone and not allowed Iraq and Iran not chair these committees - and had not let Libya chair the Human Rights committee, then I *might* say there was some hope for this international clown convention. I don't believe that is the case, though.
16 posted on 02/14/2003 9:48:14 PM PST by Pinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
And, didn't Iran just disclose they were mining urainum? Just for energy, though.....
17 posted on 02/14/2003 9:48:56 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance; Mo1
There's something bigger afoot....I don't know what, it's just that gut level feeling. Not a good one, either.
18 posted on 02/14/2003 9:56:54 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma (See Grampa Dave's Tag Line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Like they don't want anyone knowing their working on nukes
19 posted on 02/14/2003 10:05:14 PM PST by Mo1 (I HATE The Party of Clinton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Iran, Iraq, Ireland. They pick who's in charge by alphabetical order?! Sounds kinda grade schoolish.
20 posted on 02/14/2003 10:08:14 PM PST by Boiler Plate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson