THE CASE OF THE MISSING ELEPHANT

SITCHIN ^ | 2000 FR Post 1-20-03 | ZECHARIA SITCHIN

[vannrox]

THE CASE OF THE MISSING ELEPHANT

The ruins and remains of Mexico's pre-Columbian civilizations enchant, intrigue, fascinate and puzzle. Of them the oldest and earliest, that of people referred-to as Olmecs, is the most enigmatic -- for they challenge present-day scholars to explain how had people from Africa come and settled and thrived in this part of the New World, thousands of years before Columbus.

The Discovery

We know how they looked because they left behind countless sculptures, marvelously carved in stone, depicting them; some, in fact, are stone portraits of Olmec leaders; colossal in size, they immortalize in stone what, to many, has been an unpleasant enigma.

The first colossal stone head was discovered in the Mexican state of Veracruz back in 1869. Its discoverer reported it in the Bulletin of the Mexican Geographical and Statistical Society as "a magnificent sculpture that most amazingly represents an Ethiopian." The report included a drawing clearly showing the stone head's Negroid features; and that doomed the discovery to oblivion...

The Re-Discovery

It was not until 1925 that the existence of the Olmecs was reaffirmed when an archaeological team from Tulane University found another such gigantic stone head in the adjoining Mexican state of Tabasco; it measured about eight feet in height and weighed some twenty four tons.

In time, many more such colossal sculptures have been found; they depict distinctly different individuals wearing helmets; they also clearly depict, in each case, a person with African features -- black Africans.



As archaeological discovery followed archaeological discovery, it became evident that in a vast central area of Mexico stretching from the Gulf coast to the Pacific coast, these "Olmecs" built major urban centers, engaged in mining, were the first in Mesoamerica to have a calendar and hieroglyphic writing, and established what is by now recognized as Mesoamerica's Mother Civilization.

The Unpleasant Problem

The problem that this posed was twofold: Not only the issue of Negroid Africans somehow crossing the Atlantic Ocean and settling in the New World before others; but also the incredible antiquity of such arrival. This problem was dealt with by first suggesting that the Olmecs appeared after more famed peoples such as the Mayas; then by grudgingly acknowledging earlier dates B.C. --250 B.C., then 500 B.C., then 1250 B.C., then even 1500 B.C.



Faced with such evidence, the solution was to deny that these were Africans ... Even now a noted scholar, writing in the official catalogue of the Museum of Anthropology of Jalapa, states in regard to the individuals depicted in the sculptures: "in spite of the general similarity of features -- flat noses with flaring nostrils and thickened lips (leading some to falsely claim an African origin for the Olmec)," etc.

So: "To falsely claim an African origin for the Olmecs"!

And this brings me to the Case of the Missing Elephant.

An Elephant Among the Wheels

Jalapa, a gem of a town, is about two hours' drive from Veracruz (where the Spanish Conquistador Hernan Cortes landed in 1519). Its museum is undoubtedly second only to the famed one in Mexico City; but unlike Mexico City's which displays artifacts from all over the country, the Jalapa one exhibits only locally discovered artifacts -- predominantly Olmec ones.

Dramatically and effectively displayed in an innovative setting, the Museum boasts several colossal stone heads as well as other stone sculptures. It also displays smaller objects found at Olmec sites; among them, in special display showcases, are what are considered to be Olmec "toys." They include animals mounted on wheels -- a visual and evidentiary negation of the common claim that the people of Mesoamerica (and America in general) were unfamiliar with the wheel.

And included in the same display case were elephants -- "toys" made of clay.

Gone - Where and Why?

I, and some of my fans who accompanied me, saw them on previous visits to the Museum.

BUT when I (and again some of my fans with me) was there recently -- in December 1999 -- the elephants were nowhere in sight!

I could find no one in authority to obtain an explanation from. But that the elephants were once there was a fact indeed, here is a photograph of one, shot on a previous visit:



Now, here is the significance of this small artifact: There are no, and never have been, elephants in the Americas. There are and have been elephants in Africa. And a depiction of an elephant could have been made only by someone who has seen an elephant, i.e. someone who has been to Africa!

At this and other museums later visited in December 1999, guards have asserted that objects that I wished to point out and that were written up in my book The Lost Realms but somehow vanished, were loaned for an overseas exhibit.

Perhaps. But that such a hard-to-explain depiction of an elephant would be selected to highlight Mexico's ancient heritage, is either unlikely or highly significant.

I suppose one will have to revisit Jalapa and find out whether the little elephant is back among the "toys."

ZECHARIA SITCHIN

[vannrox]

© Z. Sitchin 2000
Reproduced by permission.

[Maedhros]

self-bump

[Support Free Republic]

---

Look into my eyes! You Vill not Succeed !
	Donate Here By Secure Server Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794 or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!

[tet68]

Baah, that's a shmoo if I ever saw one.

[MHGinTN]

Placemarker ... back in a second.

[MHGinTN]

Give a look at this material!... http://www.crystalinks.com/icastones.html

[MHGinTN]

Here's an easy link

[John Valentine]

I doubt that the Olmecs were African in origin. If that were so, their African genes would have been passed down into succeding generations and succeeding civilizations.

Unless one of the most vibrant and successful ciilizations ever known to pre-Columbian America just packed it's collective bags one day and went back to Africa.

And that "elephant" is not an elephant. It is obviously an anteater.

[Servant of the Nine]

Looks a lot more like a mole, shrew or other small rodent than an elephant to me.

So9

[William Terrell]

I've seen these sets of features on men of other races. Edward G Robinson is the first that comes to mind.

Since people usually make statues of leaders and not the common person, it may be that either the leadership was hereditary and these features were dominant or the leaders were chosen and these feature were prized as strong and trustworthy.

[arthurus]

And that "elephant" is not an elephant. It is obviously an anteater

Not with those ears.

[boris]

Well, even though this is a bit over the top, there may be something to it. Cocaine residue has been confirmed in hair strands found on Egypitan mummies. So startling was this fact that the discoverer was at first ridiculed--until others replicated her discovery.

Since cocaine is derived from a new-world plant, finding it in Egyptian mummies from 3000 B.C. would be "interesting".

I would not be at all surprised if it were one day shown that commerce was widespread--all around the world-- in times that we are pleased to call "primitive".

Not to say I believe in Atlantis or anything.

--Boris

[spetznaz]

Quite interesting.

Bump.

[No Truce With Kings]

Looks more like a stylized Disney mouse than an elephant to me.

M-I-C (See you tomorrow) K-E-Y (Why? Because we love you) M-O-U-S-EEEE-eeee!

[Calvin Locke]

I vaguely recall a documentary on the volcanic activity (formation of the Rockies) in North America eons ago. I'm pretty sure that elephants did indeed roam the continent.

[Swordmaker]

Give a look at this material!... http://www.crystalinks.com/icastones.html

The Icastones have been proven to be modern forgeries. They have caught the perpetrator in mid-carve!

[MHGinTN]

I'm aware that forgeries have been found and the forgers. What has not been dicounted are the original stones and those stones have been tested and found to be very old. It is akin to the cave drawings thought to be recent forgeries, yet a muddobbers nest dated to be 35,000 years old was found plastered over one of the paintings, thus proving that at least that image is very old.

[Swordmaker]

Only ONE person is responsible for finding the icastones and he has been implicated in the forgery. Stones cannot be "dated" to indicated any timeframe they may have been converted into artifacts. Please provide a peer reviewed article link for the "mud daubber" dating... exactly what percentage of the "mud" was composed of carbon that could be dated? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

[MHGinTN]

I'm not in the mood to dig for the data on the caves in Southern France (Lescaux? --sp?--). Suffice it to say, the scientists were able to date the mud deposit, though I don't know if it was carbon dating. May have been an isotope dating method other than carbon.

Material imbedded in the carving fissures was how the original testing weighed for very ancient in the initial stones found in the Peruvian cave. I'm not in the business of proofing these stories, or debunking them if you will. I just find them interesting.

[MHGinTN]

BTW, I'm not a fan of Sitchin's outlandish assertions, but this one appears of interest, this elephant claim. There are numerous ways the Olmecs might have lived in South America without leaving genetic traces to find so easily. The evidence for cocaine in ancient Egypt would appear to argue for some contact between the land masses, since that plant is not indigenous to the African continent.