Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Approves Jobless Benefit Extension
Yahoo! News ^ | 1/8/03 | Leigh Strope - AP

Posted on 01/08/2003 11:06:03 AM PST by NormsRevenge

House Approves Jobless Benefit Extension
5 minutes ago
Add Top Stories - AP to My Yahoo!

By LEIGH STROPE, AP Labor Writer

WASHINGTON - The House voted overwhelmingly Wednesday to provide additional unemployment benefits to some 2.5 million Americans, speeding the emergency bill to the White House for President Bush (news - web sites)'s signature.

Photo
AP Photo

The House passed the $7.25 billion plan — which will provide five more months of benefits — on a vote of 416-4. That came almost exactly 24 hours after the Senate gave its unanimous support. Bush, who had urged Congress to act quickly, has until Thursday to sign the bill into law to avoid potential disruptions in benefit checks being sent to jobless workers.

"Today the line is drawn," said Rep. Bill Thomas, R-Calif., chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, who scolded Democrats who were pushing for even more benefits. "We can do what we should have done back in December."

The measure helped Republicans avoid a politically damaging issue at a time when the slumping economy is showing no signs of a quick recovery. Democrats and labor unions have loudly blamed the loss of benefits on House Republicans and Bush, who remained on the sidelines during a legislative stalemate late last year.

"Frankly, it's the least they can do," said House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California. "But we can do better."

The bill will restore federal benefits to more than 750,000 people who were cut off when the program expired Dec. 28 because Congress failed to renew the program before adjourning. Another 1.6 million people who exhaust all their state benefits would be eligible for federal aid until June 1.

Democrats in both chambers failed to get coverage for another 1 million workers who already have used up state and federal benefits.

"This is an abomination, and Lord have mercy on all of us as we try to be compassionate for those in need," said Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee, D-Texas.

Bush's late support elevated unemployed workers to the top of the new Congress' must-do list and prodded House Republican leaders to accept largely the same compromise package crafted by Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton (news - web sites), D-N.Y., and Don Nickles, R-Okla. That plan passed the Senate passed in November, when it was under Democratic control.

This package was rushed through the halls of Congress at a speed not normally seen in the opening days of a new session.

"I believe this is the right thing to do," said Thomas, who supported a more modest proposal passed by the House last year that would have extended the 13-weeks of federal benefits only to workers in a few high unemployment states. "It is absolutely essential that we do it today rather than argue," he said.

House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., said the plan is "continuation of a very generous program," brushing off Democrats' complaints.

"Nothing is good enough for them," said House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, saying Democrats would extend benefits indefinitely "so someone could stay out of work for the rest of their lives."

The nation's unemployment rate has soared to match an eight-year high of 6 percent in November. December's figures will be released Friday by the Labor Department (news - web sites).

House Republicans favored tax cuts to stimulate economic growth, saying that would help jobless workers more than Democrats' attempts to expand jobless benefits. Four Republicans voted against the benefits extension.

"In addition to unemployment assistance, we will work to deliver stronger economic growth so that the unemployed can get what they most want — a job," Thomas said.

House Democrats questioned House GOP leaders' late support for a larger unemployment package. They also accused the White House of neglecting unemployed workers until Bush could reap the political benefits of a benefits extension.

Rep. Jim McDermott (news, bio, voting record), D-Wash., said he thinks the White House wants to boast about extending jobless benefits in a show of concern for the downtrodden while at the same time unveiling a stimulus package that benefits wealthy Americans.

"If you're going to stab people, first you've got to give them a ham sandwich," McDermott said.

Bush was in Chicago on Tuesday introducing his "growth and jobs" economic stimulus plan at the same time the Senate was nearing passage of the unemployment benefits. Bush's plan would provide tax relief to an estimated 92 million Americans by accelerating income tax rate cuts, wiping out all federal taxes on stock dividends paid to investors and boosting the child tax credit by $400 per child.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 01/08/2003 11:06:03 AM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Rep. Jim McDermott (news, bio, voting record), D-Wash., said he thinks the White House wants to boast about extending jobless benefits in a show of concern for the downtrodden while at the same time unveiling a stimulus package that benefits wealthy Americans.

"If you're going to stab people, first you've got to give them a ham sandwich," McDermott said.


What "Iraqi Jim" may have actually been thinking..."If you're going to stab people, first you've got to get them to turn their back on you," McDermott said.
2 posted on 01/08/2003 11:08:49 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"If you're going to stab people, first you've got to give them a ham sandwich," McDermott said.

Considering all the baloney he's been trying to give to the American people, he should know something about cold cuts.

3 posted on 01/08/2003 11:23:02 AM PST by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 7
(Republicans in roman; Democrats in italic; Independents underlined)

      S 23     YEA-AND-NAY      8-JAN-2003   1:41 PM
      QUESTION: On Passage
      BILL TITLE:  To Provide for a 5-Month Extension of the Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 2002 and for a Transition Period for Individuals Receiving Compensation when the Program under such Acts Ends

YEAS NAYS PRES NV
REPUBLICAN 218 4   6
DEMOCRATIC 197     7
INDEPENDENT 1      
TOTALS 416 4   13

--- YEAS    416 ---

Abercrombie Gingrey Oberstar
Ackerman Gonzalez Obey
Aderholt Goode Olver
Alexander Goodlatte Ortiz
Allen Gordon Osborne
Andrews Goss Ose
Baca Granger Otter
Baird Graves Owens
Baker Green (TX) Oxley
Baldwin Green (WI) Pallone
Ballance Greenwood Pascrell
Ballenger Grijalva Pastor
Barrett (SC) Gutierrez Payne
Bartlett (MD) Gutknecht Pearce
Barton (TX) Hall Pelosi
Bass Harman Pence
Beauprez Harris Peterson (MN)
Becerra Hart Peterson (PA)
Bereuter Hastings (FL) Petri
Berkley Hastings (WA) Pickering
Berman Hayes Pitts
Berry Hayworth Platts
Biggert Hefley Pombo
Bilirakis Hensarling Pomeroy
Bishop (GA) Herger Porter
Bishop (NY) Hill Portman
Bishop (UT) Hinchey Price (NC)
Blackburn Hinojosa Pryce (OH)
Blumenauer Hobson Putnam
Blunt Hoeffel Quinn
Boehlert Hoekstra Radanovich
Boehner Holden Rahall
Bonilla Holt Ramstad
Bonner Honda Rangel
Bono Hostettler Regula
Boozman Houghton Rehberg
Boswell Hoyer Renzi
Boucher Hulshof Reyes
Boyd Hunter Reynolds
Bradley (NH) Hyde Rodriguez
Brady (PA) Inslee Rogers (AL)
Brady (TX) Isakson Rogers (KY)
Brown (OH) Israel Rogers (MI)
Brown (SC) Issa Rohrabacher
Brown, Corrine Istook Ros-Lehtinen
Brown-Waite, Ginny Jackson (IL) Ross
Burgess Jackson-Lee (TX) Rothman
Burns Janklow Roybal-Allard
Burr Jefferson Royce
Burton (IN) Jenkins Ruppersberger
Buyer John Rush
Calvert Johnson (CT) Ryan (OH)
Camp Johnson (IL) Ryan (WI)
Cannon Johnson, E. B. Ryun (KS)
Cantor Johnson, Sam Sabo
Capito Jones (NC) Sanchez, Linda T.
Capps Jones (OH) Sanchez, Loretta
Capuano Kanjorski Sanders
Cardin Kaptur Sandlin
Cardoza Keller Saxton
Carson (IN) Kelly Schakowsky
Carson (OK) Kennedy (MN) Schiff
Carter Kennedy (RI) Schrock
Case Kildee Scott (GA)
Castle King (IA) Scott (VA)
Chabot King (NY) Sensenbrenner
Chocola Kingston Serrano
Clay Kirk Sessions
Clyburn Kleczka Shadegg
Coble Kline Shaw
Cole Knollenberg Shays
Collins Kolbe Sherman
Combest Kucinich Sherwood
Conyers LaHood Shimkus
Cooper Lampson Shuster
Costello Langevin Simmons
Cox Lantos Simpson
Cramer Larsen (WA) Skelton
Crane Latham Slaughter
Crenshaw LaTourette Smith (MI)
Crowley Leach Smith (NJ)
Cubin Lee Smith (TX)
Culberson Levin Smith (WA)
Cummings Lewis (CA) Snyder
Cunningham Lewis (GA) Solis
Davis (AL) Lewis (KY) Souder
Davis (CA) Linder Spratt
Davis (FL) Lipinski Stark
Davis (IL) LoBiondo Stearns
Davis (TN) Lofgren Stenholm
Davis, Jo Ann Lowey Strickland
Davis, Tom Lucas (KY) Stupak
Deal (GA) Lucas (OK) Sullivan
DeFazio Lynch Sweeney
DeGette Majette Tancredo
DeLauro Maloney Tanner
DeLay Manzullo Tauscher
DeMint Markey Taylor (MS)
Deutsch Marshall Taylor (NC)
Diaz-Balart, L. Matheson Terry
Diaz-Balart, M. Matsui Thomas
Dicks McCarthy (MO) Thompson (CA)
Dingell McCarthy (NY) Thompson (MS)
Doggett McCollum Thornberry
Dooley (CA) McCotter Tiahrt
Doolittle McCrery Tiberi
Doyle McGovern Tierney
Dreier McHugh Toomey
Duncan McInnis Turner (OH)
Dunn McIntyre Turner (TX)
Edwards McKeon Udall (CO)
Ehlers McNulty Udall (NM)
Emanuel Meehan Upton
Emerson Meek (FL) Van Hollen
Engel Meeks (NY) Velazquez
English Menendez Visclosky
Eshoo Mica Vitter
Etheridge Michaud Walden (OR)
Evans Millender-McDonald Walsh
Everett Miller (MI) Wamp
Farr Miller (NC) Waters
Fattah Miller, Gary Watson
Feeney Miller, George Watt
Ferguson Mollohan Waxman
Filner Moore Weiner
Fletcher Moran (KS) Weldon (FL)
Foley Moran (VA) Weldon (PA)
Forbes Murphy Weller
Ford Murtha Wexler
Fossella Musgrave Whitfield
Frank (MA) Myrick Wicker
Franks (AZ) Nadler Wilson (NM)
Frelinghuysen Napolitano Wilson (SC)
Frost Neal (MA) Woolsey
Gephardt Ney Wu
Gerlach Northup Wynn
Gibbons Norwood Young (AK)
Gilchrest Nunes Young (FL)
Gillmor Nussle
--- NAYS    4 ---

Flake Miller (FL)
Garrett (NJ) Paul
--- NOT VOTING    13 ---

Akin Kilpatrick Tauzin
Bachus Kind Towns
Bell Larson (CT) Wolf
Delahunt McDermott
Gallegly Nethercutt



4 posted on 01/08/2003 11:35:31 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Once again, a correct vote by Ron Paul. Lonely, but correct.
5 posted on 01/08/2003 11:39:44 AM PST by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jonathon Spectre
Miller ping
One of four lonely votes against robbing Americans to pay people not to work.
6 posted on 01/08/2003 11:43:07 AM PST by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3
From time spent here on FR I'm beginning to develop opinions on government programs from a constitutional POV (I think). On this issue - I don't see unemployment benefits as inherently bad. Just not the role of the Federal Government to begin with, and also bad as they continue to foster dependancy on gov programs. Am I way off base here? Opinion requested.
7 posted on 01/08/2003 12:16:21 PM PST by longhair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
OOhh goodie another free-be for the lazy slobs to stay home and drink beer and complain what a Country.Hey boss man lay me off please.
8 posted on 01/08/2003 12:49:18 PM PST by goose1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Idiots....people still have to pay taxes on unemployment benefits so the money goes right back into the gov't coffers anyway.....

People are so damn stupid

9 posted on 01/08/2003 12:52:43 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goose1
OOhh goodie another free-be for the lazy slobs to stay home and drink beer and complain

There wouldn't be any unemployment benefits if socialistic government policies would stop fabricating these artificial boom-and-bust economic cycles.

It's the people's money anyway, might as well get paid for sitting on my ass since my hard-earned tax dollars went for foreign aid boondoggles and welfare for those who truly don't deserve it.

10 posted on 01/08/2003 12:59:20 PM PST by ServesURight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money from the public treasure. From that moment on the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most money from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy followed by a dictatorship. Alexander Tyler
11 posted on 01/08/2003 1:02:33 PM PST by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

From the SJ Mercury News -- President Bush has signed the bill.

Details of unemployment bill

President Bush signed legislation today extending the federal emergency unemployment program for an additional five months at a cost of $7.25 billion.

Here are some details and background:

--Most states offer 26 weeks of unemployment benefits. Jobless workers who depleted their state benefits last year got an extra 13 weeks of federal benefits that Congress approved.

--That program expired Dec. 28 because Congress couldn't agree to extend it.

--More than 750,000 people in the process of receiving those federal benefits got cut off Dec. 28, before they had received all 13 weeks. Those benefits will be restored.

--In the next few months, 1.6 million people will use up their state benefits. They now can qualify for the extra 13 weeks of federal benefits until June 1.

--About 1 million people have exhausted both state and federal benefits. They won't get any more aid.

--Bush had to sign the bill into law by Thursday to avoid delays in issuing benefit checks.

--Funding for the extension will come from the unemployment insurance trust fund, which has cash reserves of about $24 billion.
12 posted on 01/08/2003 2:58:10 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longhair
In theory they don't foster dependency the way welfare does, because in order to qualify you had to have been working in the first place. Presumably the people have a motivation to get back to work. Unemployment benefits do not replace nearly what people earned in their jobs.
13 posted on 01/08/2003 3:02:12 PM PST by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Come June 1st, they'll vote for another extension. Bank on it.

If I know I will always get these extensions (politicians will alway pander), and I can live on what they give me (not live well, but still live), why bother getting a job?

14 posted on 01/08/2003 3:10:25 PM PST by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lasereye
Thanks for the perspective LaserEye.
15 posted on 01/08/2003 5:39:59 PM PST by longhair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson