Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thirty years after Roe v. Wade, Americans show reverence for life
Fredericksburg (VA) Free Lance-Star ^ | 1/5/03 | Linda White

Posted on 01/05/2003 5:42:59 PM PST by madprof98

MY FRIEND SAT across from me on the bed in a dorm room at college, and revealed to me a woman's most intimate secret: She was pregnant.

I was struck with awe: How does it feel, I asked, to know there's a life growing inside you?

The wonder both of us felt soon gave way to a pragmatism unfortunately permeated with ignorance. It wasn't a convenient time to get married, my friend said. Babies would have to wait.

I stuck by her loyally as she went through an abortion. That was three decades ago and I still think about it.

This January marks the 30th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion in the United States. Since then, some 40 million children have been aborted. Ninety-three percent of the time, women name "social reasons" as their motive for the procedure, not their health, or rape or incest.

Babies often come at inconvenient times.

A decade after college, when I was a young mother I met Mary Ann Fischer, who inconveniently discovered she was pregnant in 1977. A diabetic since her youth, Mary Ann had had a kidney transplant in 1975 and had lost much of her vision to the disease.

When the pregnancy test came back positive, Mary Ann's Georgetown doctor advised her to have an abortion. Her health simply would not support a pregnancy.

But Mary Ann and her husband, Joe, believed in God and they kept looking for another answer. Finally, a doctor at Peter Bent Brigham Hospital in Boston was willing to give them hope.

Mary Ann began bi-weekly flights to Boston for obstetric care. Then, when she was 16 weeks pregnant there was another surprise: She was carrying twins.

A shock wave rolled through Mary Ann's doctors at that news. Definitely abort now, they advised her, or she would lose what was left of her eyesight.

The Fischers refused. They would see the pregnancy through.

Jonathan and Stephen were born May 24, 1978. Mary Ann became the first kidney transplant recipient to successfully carry twins.

Today the boys are active, productive young men, both college graduates. One is a computer scientist, the other a Hollywood film editor. And Mary Ann--who survived the pregnancy without further health complications--and her husband, Joe, are blessed with sons they thought they'd never have.

It was certainly inconvenient for my friend Lorie Lasater and her husband, Shelby, to discover baby number two was on the way a few years ago. Lorie had been diagnosed with thyroid cancer when their first child, Alex, was a year old. Now he was 3 and Lorie was still receiving treatments.

When her third radiation treatment left her unusually sick Lorie discovered she was unexpectedly, inconveniently pregnant. Doctors advised her to abort the fetus, who they feared might be deformed.

It was a frightening time for Lorie, whose Marine Corps husband had just been deployed overseas. A chaplain's wife helped calm her down. "God knew this was coming," she said. "This pregnancy was not a surprise to Him."

Lorie's mother echoed these sentiments. "No matter what happens, anytime you conceive a child you have given someone eternity."

Along with her husband, who was shipped home on emergency leave, Lorie consulted with numerous doctors. Eventually she found one who offered her hope: She would either miscarry or everything would be fine, he predicted. Relieved, Lorie and Shelby prayed their way through the next months.

Their son Blake was born in May 2000, perfectly healthy. He was joined just a few weeks ago by a little brother, Nolan.

Faced with the courage of these women, I think back 30 years ago to the time when I did not have the vision--or the faith--to help my friend find an alternative to abortion.

Not long after we stumbled through the darkness of that decision, Lennart Nilsson published his incredible book "A Child is Born," a collection of photographs that show the development of a child in utero. This window to the womb is astonishing: An unborn baby sucks his thumb, a sperm penetrates an egg, a tiny hand, fingers fully formed, grasps an umbilical cord.

The book, along with the advancing technology of sonography, testifies that what is in a pregnant woman's uterus is not tissue: He or she is a child. And a child, no matter how inconvenient, deserves a chance at life.

America is coming to the same conclusion, apparently. Abortions are down, declining now to rates last seen in the late 1970s. And a recent Zogby poll shows that one-fifth of Americans say they're less in favor of abortion today than they were a decade ago.

Things on campus have changed as well. When I was in college, signs read "Question Authority." Now, an organization called Feminists for Life peppers campuses with the slogan "Question Abortion." We've come a long way, baby.

Three decades down the pike I still wonder who my friend's child would have become had he or she been allowed to live. Add to that one child 40 million others aborted and I wonder, have we destroyed the life of the one who might have found the cure for cancer? How many artists, musicians, dancers, doctors, teachers, and presidents have we killed?

Fortunately, I also understand that God, who created all these lives, is a God of second, third, and fourth chances. Even really bad choices can be forgiven.

Choosing life is often inconvenient. It is always a risk. But the Nolans and the Blakes, the Jonathans and the Stephens, and the Jennifers, Tonishas, Sonias, and Rachels are worth it.

Life is entrusted to us to protect and nurture, not abort. Thirty years after Roe v. Wade, we as a nation are beginning to understand that. That, to me, is good news.

LINDA WHITE is a columnist for The Free Lance-Star.

Date published: Sun, 01/05/2003


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: abortionlist; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
Can't wait for the day a piece like this makes it into the NYTimes or Washington Post.
1 posted on 01/05/2003 5:42:59 PM PST by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: madprof98
Beautiful piece. Thanks for the post.
2 posted on 01/05/2003 5:46:13 PM PST by friendly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98; RnMomof7; marshmallow; Saundra Duffy; .30Carbine; Howlin; Miss Marple; Mark17; ...
We may be waiting a long time for that.

Thanks for posting....it's one of the most uplifting things I've read in a long time....

3 posted on 01/05/2003 5:49:04 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
A beautiful story. Thanks for posting it. Maybe a mother-to-be will read it too and make the right decision for her unborn baby.
4 posted on 01/05/2003 5:53:14 PM PST by LADY J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: friendly
Its because we finally have a leader who fears and reverences Jehovah God rather than what the rabble on the street does! Get used to it liberals, a new day is coming to drag you kicking and screaming into the pit of HELL for murdering all the millions of innocents who didn't get a choice or a voice in the matter!
5 posted on 01/05/2003 5:56:47 PM PST by wharfrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
Other than the Catholic church, what other religious denominations are unapologetically pro-life? I have seen "Lutherans for Life" and similar groups as factions within mainline protestant churches, but I have read some of the adopted positions of Christian churches (Lutheran, Methodist, Episcopalian) which I personally find troubling on the issue of the sanctity of life. Can someone help me out here? I am not asking in an effort to be contrary at all, I am truly curious. I suppose a request not to be flamed is futile, but I make one nonetheless.
6 posted on 01/05/2003 6:04:45 PM PST by pettifogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pettifogger
Evangelicals tend to be pro life - Southern Baptists, Nazarenes, Assemblies of God.

A lot of mainliners are also. The "view from the pew" is usually more conservative than the higher ups in those denominations, especially Methodist.

7 posted on 01/05/2003 6:17:44 PM PST by NEPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
http://www.feministsforlife.org/
8 posted on 01/05/2003 6:28:33 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pettifogger
National pro-Life Religious Council
http://www.nprcouncil.org/members.htm


Jews For Life
http://jewsforlife.org


Religious/Denominational Organizations

http://www.abortionfacts.com/help/other_web_resources.asp#Religious/Denominational%20Organizations

Baptists for Life, Inc.
Christian Nurse Midwives Association
Catholics United for Life
Christian Coalition
Eternal Perspectives Ministries - Randy Alcorn
Lutherans for Life
Lutherans for Life North Carolina
Michigan Christians for Life
Orthodox Christians for Life
Our Lady of Guadalupe
Priests for Life
Presbyterians Pro-Life
Pro-Life Action League
Stand to Reason - search "abortion"



9 posted on 01/05/2003 6:46:35 PM PST by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
A wonderful article.

I just want to comment on a side issue, the difficulty in finding obstetricians who are willing to work with high-risk pregnancies. For, example:

Lorie consulted with numerous doctors. Eventually she found one who offered her hope: She would either miscarry or everything would be fine, he predicted.

This doctor is to be praised, because when the patient takes a risk, so does the doctor. An emotional risk, since most doctors do care about patients, and eventually one or two of the high-risk patients will have that bad outcome all the other doctor's talk about. And a professional risk, since risk-taking docs get sued. And no, as doctors know, having a patient sign a waiver does not provide much protection.

10 posted on 01/05/2003 6:52:13 PM PST by Steve Eisenberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pettifogger
The Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, is pro-life. The first Missouri Synod Lutherans I ever met (or heard of) were in the back of a Paddy wagon. They said "We're supposed to be anti-Catholic," but they said they had been arrested with Catholics too many times to be anti-Catholic anymore.
11 posted on 01/05/2003 6:53:25 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pettifogger
In the South all the major denominations are pro-life; Southern Baptist, Church of Christ, United Pentecostals, Assemblies of God and nearly all of the non-denominational Charismatic churches that are so popular these days. Most of the Black denominations (COGIC, CME)are pro-life, though far too many of them are too busy being political organizations for you to notice.

Even the "mainline" (as defined by the media) denominations (presby, meth, episc) are more likely to have pro-life pastors down here. This is pro-life country.
12 posted on 01/05/2003 6:54:05 PM PST by pdlglm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pettifogger
Other than the Catholic church, what other religious denominations are unapologetically pro-life?

Orthodox Jews. I have never heard of a pro-choice Orthodox rabbi, although the same is not true of all those they preach to (for example, Sen. Lieberman). However, in this respect Orthodox Judaism is not different than the Catholic church.

Of course, the other branches of U.S. Judaism (Conservative, Reform, and the even further left Reconstructionists) are another story.

13 posted on 01/05/2003 7:01:08 PM PST by Steve Eisenberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
"Can't wait for the day a piece like this makes it into the NYTimes or Washington Post. "

It doesn't matter. Thanks to the internet, Freerepublic and excellent posts like yours, the NYT's and the comPost are becoming increasingly irrelevant.

14 posted on 01/05/2003 7:03:23 PM PST by hillsborofox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Feminists for Life kick butt!!

In recent years Patricia Ireland (or one of those androgynist abortion proponents that I can't tell apart) called them the "greatest threat to 'Choice' today."

For that reason alone they get my money, even though I don't agree with all their policies. They've taken a very smart "pro-woman, pro-life" stance that the opposition is hard-pressed to counter.
15 posted on 01/05/2003 7:10:37 PM PST by hillsborofox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pettifogger
Other than the Catholic church, what other religious denominations are unapologetically pro-life?

I don't think this is a major issue for most Catholics. They claim to be pro-life, but they vote mostly Dem. Hand-outs are more important than this issue.

16 posted on 01/05/2003 7:16:55 PM PST by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
bump
17 posted on 01/05/2003 7:33:38 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speekinout
Too many CINO politicians and political activists have filled Catholic voter heads with the big lie, that the womb-bound are not fully human so abortion isn't killing an individual human being. It's our job to share the truth and expose this big lie as the holocaust driver it is.
18 posted on 01/05/2003 7:36:20 PM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
Real fine post.
19 posted on 01/05/2003 7:38:32 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; Coleus
ping
20 posted on 01/05/2003 7:39:48 PM PST by ELS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson