Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton's Sugar Daddy Games: Mary Landrieu and her constituents have some bitter demands.
Wall St Journal ^ | 12-20-02 | Mary Anastasia O'Grady

Posted on 12/20/2002 5:03:58 AM PST by SJackson

Edited on 04/22/2004 11:47:46 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

In her testimony to the grand jury Monica Lewinsky offered an interesting aside: In the middle of a "meeting" with her, Bill Clinton took a phone call from Florida sugar baron Alfonso Fanjul.

That little detail didn't make the tabloids but it raised eyebrows among free trade advocates. The easy access to an otherwise engaged president reaffirmed the suspicion that sugar growers -- who keep Washington sweetened with their political giving -- had disproportionate influence in the Oval Office. In 1999 Mr. Fanjul raked up a million dollars for Mr. Clinton's party at a fund-raiser on his estate.


(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 12/20/2002 5:03:58 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The American sugar lobby is the main reason we have never had the guts to stand up to Castro. Cheap sugar from Cuba would ruin the fat cat over-priced, subsidized, crooked, mafia-like American sugar growers. So much for standing up for freedom. Both political parties should be ashamed, but I suppose they aren't because they fat cat, subsidized, crooked, mafia-like Americans themselves.
2 posted on 12/20/2002 5:34:31 AM PST by afz400
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afz400
"they fat cat"

"that they are"

which inspires a short spontanious poem...

"They fat cat

that they are

tip caddies big

to make par."

3 posted on 12/20/2002 6:51:44 AM PST by battlegearboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
It's tough to criticize Landrieu and the sugar industry after the Bush administration's disgraceful capitulation to the steel and lumber industries.

On a positive note, it appears that U.S. lumber producers are getting screwed by the very softwood lumber tariff that was supposed to protect them. Canadian lumber mills that are forced to pay a 19.3% tariff on lumber exported to the U.S. have decided that the only way to overcome that higher cost is to increase their production substantially and reduce their unit costs through economies of scale.

When the 19.3% tariff is eventually eliminated (and it will be -- Canada has won this dispute every time it came up before an international trade board), there won't be too many lumber mills left in the U.S. because the Canadian mills, which are now selling cheaper lumber WITH the tariff in place, will have the advantage of the improved efficiency as well.

Oh, and all the revenue the U.S. collected on that tariff over the last two years will have to be paid back to Canadian producers. So the U.S. won't have the lumber industry jobs, and they won't have the tariff revenue either.

F#cking morons.

4 posted on 12/20/2002 6:54:13 AM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afz400
Don't forget that the Fanjul brothers are Cubian expatriots. The FL ex-pats are rabidly anti-Castro and the importation of any Cuban sugar is not just an economical issue but a political one as well.
5 posted on 12/20/2002 7:21:12 AM PST by NYDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Well, sugar is already plenty cheap! The answer, go on a locarb diet. Eat more chikun.
6 posted on 12/20/2002 7:24:07 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Alberta's Child
So the U.S. won't have the lumber industry jobs, and they won't have the tariff revenue either.

But the spotted owl will have a home. /sarcasm

8 posted on 12/20/2002 9:41:27 AM PST by chit*chat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Wondered what was the secret to Mary Landrieu's just barely squeezing by her Republican opponent. Another demoRAT ploy of the best defense is a good offense. What better way to accomplish a deed than by Landrieu blaming her opponent of what Landrieu was guilty of.
9 posted on 12/20/2002 11:16:49 AM PST by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson