Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Interstellar Signal from the 70s Continues to Puzzle Researchers (WOW signal)
Space.Com ^ | 12/05/02 | Seth Shostak

Posted on 12/05/2002 4:26:32 PM PST by Brett66

Of the many "maybe’s" that SETI has turned up in its four-decade history, none is better known than the one that was discovered in August, 1977, in Columbus, Ohio. The famous Wow signal was found as part of a long-running sky survey conducted with Ohio State University’s "Big Ear" radio telescope.

The Wow signal’s unusual nomenclature connotes both the surprise of the discovery and its sox-knocking strength (60 Janskys in a 10 KHz channel, which is more than 50 thousand times more incoming energy than the minimum signal that would register as a hit for today’s Project Phoenix.)

But is the Wow signal’s notoriety merely the triumph of marketing over substance? Could this momentary cosmic burp have really been ET, or was it just random terrestrial interference dressed up with a sexy moniker? For a decade, Robert Gray, a long-time, independent SETI researcher from Chicago, has been trying to find out.

Gray, like many others, was attracted by an intriguing feature of the Wow signal: the manner in which it rose and fell over the course of 72 seconds. Why is this interesting? Just this: the Ohio State survey kept the telescope fixed, letting the Earth’s daily spin rotate the heavens through its narrow beam. The "beam," of course, was the elongated patch of sky to which the telescope was sensitive – the direction from which it could pick up cosmic signals. The sensitivity was greatest at the center of the beam, falling off to either side. So as a celestial radio source passed by, it first rose in apparent intensity as Earth’s rotation brought it into the beam, reached a peak in the beam center, and then faded away. Given the size of the Ohio State beam, this rise and fall should take 72 seconds. And for the Wow signal, it did.

Now contrast this with what you’d expect if the telescope had merely been briefly flooded by an interfering terrestrial signal. The intensity would suddenly switch full on, and then, sometime later, switch off. Even if the interference was due to a low-Earth orbit satellite, a source that might cause a rise and fall in intensity, you wouldn’t expect it to fortuitously last for 72 seconds.

For these reasons, the Wow signal gets high marks for being a credible candidate for SETI.

On the other hand, there are some aspects of this seductive signal that nudge it toward a lower grade. The Ohio State telescope actually used two beams, situated side-by-side on the sky. Any cosmic source would therefore be seen first in one (for 72 seconds) and then – roughly 3 minutes later – in the other (also 72 seconds.) The Wow signal failed this simple test. It came on gangbusters in one beam, but was a no-show in the other: suspicious and disheartening.

But as Gray and others have realized, this odd, one-beam behavior could be caused by an alien transmission that simply went off the air during the 3 minutes between beams. Maybe ET went on vacation, or took an extended lunch break. If the putative aliens permanently shut down their transmitter, then there’s no chance of ever hearing the Wow signal again. Like a single sighting of the Loch Ness monster, we would never be able to prove what it was. But if the signal is periodic – if, for example, the aliens are using a rotating radio beacon that sweeps the star-studded strata of the Milky Way once every five minutes or every five hours – then we could hope to find it by just looking again.

Robert Gray has looked again. And again. In the last decade, Gray and his colleagues have used the Harvard META SETI system and then the Very Large Array (VLA) to search for a reappearance of the Wow signal. The experiment at the VLA, in particular, was an impressive effort, as it was far more sensitive than the original Ohio State equipment and covered more of the band. Neither attempt succeeded in retrieving the signal, however.

Gray realized that he might be the victim of insufficient patience. The longest of his reobservations had been 22 minutes. What if the aliens’ beacon flashed less often than once every 22 minutes? What if their transmitter was fixed to the home planet, rotating (and flashing) once every 20 or 30 hours?

In the October 20 issue of The Astrophysical Journal, Gray and Simon Ellingsen, of Australia’s University of Tasmania, report on new observations (partially supported by the SETI Institute) designed to test this idea. Their new try was made at the 26-meter radio telescope in Hobart, Tasmania. This southern hemisphere instrument could continuously follow for most of a day the patch of sky (in the constellation of Sagittarius) where the "Big Ear" was pointing when it found the ‘Wow’ signal. They made six 14-hour observations, and even though their telescope was rather smaller than the venerable Ohio State antenna, they still had sufficient sensitivity to find signals only 5% as strong as Wow’s 1977 intensity. They also covered five times as much of the radio dial as the original "Big Ear" telescope.

Bottom line? No dice. To quote from their article, "no signals resembling the Ohio State Wow were detected…" Of course, if the signal’s repetition cycle were much longer than 14 hours, then even this careful experiment could have easily missed it. But as Gray and Ellingsen point out, if the signal were really this infrequent, then the chance to have found it in the first place was very slim.

So was the Wow signal our first detection of extraterrestrials? It might have been, but no scientist would make such a claim. Scientific experiment is inherently, and rightly, skeptical. This isn’t just a sour attitude; it’s the only way to avoid routinely fooling yourself. So until and unless the cosmic beep measured in Ohio is found again, the Wow signal will remain a What signal.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Technical
KEYWORDS: astronomy; et; goliath; interstellar; radioastronomy; seti; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 12/05/2002 4:26:32 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *Space; RightWhale; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; The_Victor; ...
Ping.
2 posted on 12/05/2002 4:27:14 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
index bump
3 posted on 12/05/2002 4:29:30 PM PST by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
It's Jimi Hendrix' "Voodoo Chile"
4 posted on 12/05/2002 4:32:30 PM PST by KriegerGeist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
So Mrs Lieberman was just receiving a signal? Well, good for her.
5 posted on 12/05/2002 4:37:27 PM PST by Mark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
That would be just like humans to miss the phone call :)
6 posted on 12/05/2002 4:37:59 PM PST by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66; All
You can lend your computer's CPU to aid SETI's search for extraterrestrial life by downloading the SETI At Home software
7 posted on 12/05/2002 4:39:00 PM PST by martin_fierro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
I get a kick out of SETI and the ET crowd. Don't get me wrong, I love science fiction, but I just refuse to believe that other world beings have visited this planet and have no left a single credible shred of evidence behind.

I don't believe the government is capable of completely covering it up either. We've seen how incompetent government is when it tries to do anything else, there's no way evidence of aliens could be completely contained, yet apparently it is, or there are no other lifeforms out there (intelligent that is).

The Universe is MAN'S playground, given to us by the L-rd Himself.

8 posted on 12/05/2002 4:39:25 PM PST by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
...before I left home for what I expected would be a three-hour tour of your troubled little planet, I inadvertantly left my Jansky switched on.

Sorry.
9 posted on 12/05/2002 4:44:55 PM PST by PoorMuttly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xrp
I disagree, as the movie contact says, "It would be an awful waste of space"

10 posted on 12/05/2002 4:46:41 PM PST by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xrp
There is a *HUGE* difference between there being life
elsewhere in the cosmos and us having been visited by
them.
11 posted on 12/05/2002 5:00:17 PM PST by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xrp
The Universe is MAN'S playground, given to us by the L-rd Himself.

What a sad t
12 posted on 12/05/2002 5:03:42 PM PST by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
...hought.
13 posted on 12/05/2002 5:04:32 PM PST by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xrp
I just refuse to believe that other world beings have visited this planet and have no left a single credible shred of evidence behind.

Maybe they are hardcore enviromentalist and prefer not to make thier "presents" known.

14 posted on 12/05/2002 5:05:00 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
It's actually a message saying "Send more Chuck Berry"
15 posted on 12/05/2002 5:09:26 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
The famous Wow signal was found as part of a long-running sky survey conducted with Ohio State University’s "Big Ear" radio telescope.

Perhaps they were listening to the only WOW Radio signal that there is...

"I have no idea what's going on..."

16 posted on 12/05/2002 5:26:15 PM PST by Itzlzha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xrp
I don't believe the government is capable of completely covering it up either.

They aren't. There are numerous reports of incidents of ET contacts and coninciding government coverups, internationally, and we know of them only by the fact that they were not successful in their cover up. My take on ETs visiting Earth is this: For all the hundreds of thousands of 911-calls, sightings, videos, pictures, and reports, what are the odds that they are all hoaxes and weatherballoons and drunken psychos. My theory is that the media and the scientific community, the only entities capable of "certifying" a visitation, are so arrogant and idealogical in their denial that they refuse to even consider the possibility and examine the evidence. Some things are so scary and earth-shattering that we ignore them even while they stare us in the face.

17 posted on 12/05/2002 5:33:01 PM PST by ForOurFuture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PoorMuttly
Whos on Sagittarius ?
I don't know.........
Wow!
18 posted on 12/05/2002 5:41:37 PM PST by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tet68
...actually, I Don't Know plays Second Base for the Orion Radiation Belters....
19 posted on 12/05/2002 6:22:51 PM PST by PoorMuttly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: xrp; Brett66; ForOurFuture
I get a kick out of SETI and the ET crowd. Don't get me wrong, I love science fiction, but I just refuse to believe that other world beings have visited this planet and have no left a single credible shred of evidence behind.

Ummm... SETI has absolutely NOTHING to do with UFOs. SETI is looking only for a signal thay may be of non natural origin.

20 posted on 12/05/2002 6:43:44 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson