Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Revolutionary New Theory For Origins Of Life On Earth
UK Royal Society ^ | 12/4/2002 | Professor William Martin, Institut fuer Botanik III, University of Dusseldorf and Dr Michael Russell

Posted on 12/04/2002 12:23:13 PM PST by forsnax5

A totally new and highly controversial theory on the origin of life on earth, is set to cause a storm in the science world and has implications for the existence of life on other planets.

Research* by Professor William Martin of the University of Dusseldorf and Dr Michael Russell of the Scottish Environmental Research Centre in Glasgow, claims that living systems originated from inorganic incubators - small compartments in iron sulphide rocks. The new theory radically departs from existing perceptions of how life developed and it will be published in Philosophical Transactions B, a learned journal produced by the Royal Society.

Since the 1930s the accepted theories for the origins of cells and therefore the origin of life, claim that chemical reactions in the earth's most ancient atmosphere produced the building blocks of life - in essence - life first, cells second and the atmosphere playing a role.

Professor Martin and Dr Russell have long had problems with the existing hypotheses of cell evolution and their theory turns traditional views upside down. They claim that cells came first. The first cells were not living cells but inorganic ones made of iron sulphide and were formed not at the earth's surface but in total darkness at the bottom of the oceans. Life, they say, is a chemical consequence of convection currents through the earth's crust and in principle, this could happen on any wet, rocky planet.

Dr Russell says: "As hydrothermal fluid - rich in compounds such as hydrogen, cyanide, sulphides and carbon monoxide - emerged from the earth's crust at the ocean floor, it reacted inside the tiny metal sulphide cavities. They provided the right microenvironment for chemical reactions to take place. That kept the building blocks of life concentrated at the site where they were formed rather than diffusing away into the ocean. The iron sulphide cells, we argue, is where life began."

One of the implications of Martin and Russell's theory is that life on our planet, even on other planets or some large moons in our own solar system, might be much more likely than previously assumed.

The research by Professor Martin and Dr Russell is backed up by another paper The redox protein construction kit: pre-last universal common+ ancestor evolution of energy-conserving enzymes by F. Baymann, E. Lebrun, M. Brugna, B. Schoepp-Cothenet, M.-T. Giudici-Orticoni & W. Nitschke which will be published in the same edition.

*On the origins of cells: a hypothesis for the evolutionary transitions from abiotic geochemistry to chemoautotrophic prokaryotes, and from prokaryotes to nucleated cells by Professor William Martin, Institut fuer Botanik III, University of Dusseldorf and Dr Michael Russell, Scottish Environmental Research Centre, Glasgow.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abiogenesis; crevolist; life
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
For those who appreciate irony... :)
1 posted on 12/04/2002 12:23:13 PM PST by forsnax5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *crevo_list; VadeRetro; PatrickHenry; jennyp; balrog666; general_re; Right Wing Professor; ...
Another outrageous theory surfaces!
2 posted on 12/04/2002 12:27:01 PM PST by forsnax5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
Oh my.
So few straws, so many grasps....
3 posted on 12/04/2002 12:29:24 PM PST by azhenfud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
They provided the right microenvironment for chemical reactions to take place.

I don't think so. They also provided limited reactants. If it was likely then it should be fairly easy to do in the lab.

4 posted on 12/04/2002 12:30:33 PM PST by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
living systems originated from inorganic incubators - small compartments in iron sulphide rocks

So this is how the first vegatative soul came into being? Sheesh.

5 posted on 12/04/2002 12:32:23 PM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
Or another surface theory.
6 posted on 12/04/2002 12:34:04 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
Life in some microbial form is common to rock. Somewhere someone said the biomass of bacteria inside the rock of the earth is greater than the biomass of everything living on the surface [including you and your dog and the mold growing inside your refrigerator.]

Don't know if it's true or not, but it seems reasonable, and would make the odds of microbial life existing beyond earth in every rocky planet orbiting every star a certainty.

The popular idea that all life came from one primitive cell and ramified into species is basic to some origin hypotheses, but isn't necessary or even likely.

7 posted on 12/04/2002 12:36:22 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
Again, scientists spend too much time looking backwards.
8 posted on 12/04/2002 12:36:58 PM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
"...rich in compounds such as hydrogen, cyanide, sulphides and carbon monoxide."

Ah, those essential compounds of life. What would we be without them???

9 posted on 12/04/2002 12:38:12 PM PST by azhenfud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I dunno -- when I was single I had some SERIOUS 'fridge mold going on. Named it "Fred" and taught it to bring me beer.
10 posted on 12/04/2002 12:38:36 PM PST by freedumb2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
"So this is how the first vegatative soul came into being?"
Maybe that is where the Democraps come from!! It would seem so, where else could one gleen the saying "dumb as a box of rocks!!"
11 posted on 12/04/2002 12:39:41 PM PST by Fighter@heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
So this is how the first vegatative soul came into being? Sheesh.

Iron sulphide(sulfide) AKA Fool's Gold


12 posted on 12/04/2002 12:40:31 PM PST by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
Wasn't this a Star Trek episode? The one where the microscopic, metallic lifeforms refer to humans as "ugly bags of mostly water"? (On the other hand, had they refered to them as "ugly bags of mostly water in crusty, black pantsuits"... But I digress.)
13 posted on 12/04/2002 12:41:10 PM PST by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
"ugly bags of mostly water in crusty, black pantsuits..."

Let me guess; Hillery?

14 posted on 12/04/2002 12:44:03 PM PST by azhenfud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
Some writer, I can't remember his name right now, postulated that water created people to transport it from one place to another. The older I get and the more frequent my night time trecks to the head, the more I believe this theory.
15 posted on 12/04/2002 12:47:33 PM PST by Blue Screen of Death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
Being science-challenged, I'll have to watch this debate from the sidelines. It's a good thing though to keep challenging standing precepts. It's a conceit to think that we know much about anything at this stage of our development and evolution.
16 posted on 12/04/2002 12:49:30 PM PST by thegreatbeast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The popular idea that all life came from one primitive cell and ramified into species is basic to some origin hypotheses, but isn't necessary or even likely.

I'm not aware that any known bacteria have characteristics that would disqualify them from this hypothesis.

17 posted on 12/04/2002 12:49:39 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; *crevo_list; RadioAstronomer; Scully; Piltdown_Woman; ...
Life everywhere! Ping.

[This ping list for the evolution -- not creationism -- side of evolution threads, and sometimes for other science topics. If you want to be included, or dropped, let me know.]

18 posted on 12/04/2002 12:49:54 PM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimer
Again, scientists spend too much time looking backwards.

And some spend too much time reading fairy tales.

19 posted on 12/04/2002 12:53:26 PM PST by rmmcdaniell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rmmcdaniell
And some spend too much time reading fairy tales.

And mythology

20 posted on 12/04/2002 12:59:56 PM PST by clamper1797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson