Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REPUBLICAN REVOLUTION: On political landscape, shake-up has just begun
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | Thursday, November 7, 2002

Posted on 11/09/2002 2:08:46 PM PST by John Lenin

REPUBLICAN REVOLUTION: On political landscape, shake-up has just begun

Gus Cochran - For the Journal-Constitution

Thursday, November 7, 2002

Georgians awoke Wednesday to an electoral earthquake. Much of the state's familiar political architecture has been reduced to rubble and much conventional wisdom is upended.

Republicans seized control of the governor's mansion for the first time since Reconstruction. Moreover, although the Republican takeover seemed inevitable, even imminent, the real shock stems from seeing a sitting governor tossed from office, the first defeat of a gubernatorial incumbent in Georgia since the one-term limit was removed in 1976. Barnes' defeat, despite his 6-to-1 spending advantage over his lesser-known challenger, defies all the supposed "laws" of political science.

Sax beating Max is less unexpected, but if war hero Cleland is vulnerable for resisting a president on the issue of homeland security, what Southern Democrat can feel safe in Congress?

The GOP gains are the more impressive for a party of an incumbent president in an off-year election, marking only the third time in a century that the president's party has gained in midterm.

House Speaker Tom Murphy, a veritable pillar of Georgia politics for four decades, was also toppled. Having served in the General Assembly since the days of the "rule of the rustics," the speaker, who proved adept at accommodating the growing urban interests of the state, nonetheless fell prey to spreading suburban Republicanism as Atlanta wreaked its revenge on Georgia.

But appearances can be deceptive, and much of the solid substructure of Southern and American politics remains firmly in place. Money still matters; this election, like every recent election, was the most expensive in history. The parties have raised approaching half a billion dollars in anticipation of McCain-Feingold's ban on soft money, and groups were exploring loopholes and sponsoring court challenges before the law even took effect.

And competition, while fierce, is still contained to only a few crucial races. Overall, incumbents, especially in the House, retain formidable advantages, limiting the possibilities for change to a few close contests. Despite the upsets in key individual races, the net number of seats shifting in Congress is quite small.

President Bush's re-election stock, of course, will soar, and war with Iraq, already likely, begins to appear a sure bet. Republican control of the elected branches will begin to produce an even more rightward tilt in the federal judiciary. In particular, look for several Supreme Court justices to leave the bench soon, timing their retirements to reap the rewards of a Republican president and Senate for the first time since the current court majority was shaped by Ronald Reagan.

Commentators are charging Democrats with having no clear message, but what message would work? Cleland supported Bush's tax cut and voted to authorize the president to use force against Iraq. Does supporting the president on security issues but trying to focus on Social Security and the economy prove "It's not the economy, stupid?" Or does it mean there is only one real issue after Sept. 11: homeland security?

One safe prediction: This election, like most earthquakes, will be followed by strong aftershocks.

Gus Cochran teaches political science at Agnes Scott College.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Everybody has left out the McKinney factor in Georgia politics. Hmmmm
1 posted on 11/09/2002 2:08:46 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
I don't think it was a victory of the "suburbs," either, or the country clubbers. I think it was the Christian vote, disgusted with the direction the Democrat party has taken in recent years.
2 posted on 11/09/2002 2:19:15 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
Don't forget how many votes Cynthia Tucker has pushed over to the Republicans. We owe the lady a big thanks.
3 posted on 11/09/2002 2:34:58 PM PST by Blue Screen of Death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
For me, it was... Cleland voted FOR partial birth abortion.

I didn't forget when it came time to vote.

And to get Tom Murphy out... was sweet indeed. I think a lot more than they realized... had had enough!!
4 posted on 11/09/2002 2:46:15 PM PST by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frnewsjunkie
I think a lot more than they realized... had had enough!!

Yep...no matter what issue is most important to you, what "group" you might belong to, or what state you live in...

5 posted on 11/09/2002 3:04:49 PM PST by 88keys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
Republican control of the elected branches will begin to produce an even more rightward tilt in the federal judiciary.

Anyone that describes judges that would uphold the Constitution a rightward tilt is obvious leaning way to the left, like Gus "Hall" Cochran.

6 posted on 11/09/2002 3:39:49 PM PST by F-117A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frnewsjunkie; All
People here were indeed fed up.

I wish I could claim some kind of foreknowledge of this "Earthquake" that is still rumbling through Georgia, but I am still stunned by the extent of it.

I did have an inkling of how vast and profound it might be, from the oddest of sources... in the weeks before the election, I mentioned to my wife that I "had never heard so many callers, so angry" on local "talkback" radio...

I told her that people seemed angrier than I had seen them, even during the impeachment/rape stories of X-42.

This is a sleepy, little southern "city"-- about 16,000 souls, and most people just don't get that worked up about things. But I have never seen such a white-hot level of anger, no, rage is more apt.

In some ways the McKinneys were easy targets- they were such overt bigots, and so loud, they drew a lot of attention to themselves, and too many people just got fed up with their shenannigans.

I guess Barnes ouster was the biggest surprise- a sitting Governor is hard to depose... although my mailman had said to me a week ago today "I don't know any teachers who will vote for him..."

Max Cleland... well, Max was, personally, a good guy, but he voted like Ted Kennedy... not really representing his constituents well.

The "toss-out" of Speaker Murphy was cataclysmic- that position is far more powerful than the Governor. I really am still stunned.

7 posted on 11/09/2002 3:53:23 PM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Remember the '98 election, when conservatives Christians just skipped the election out of disgust for Republicans reluctance to take Clinton on concerning ethics and morality. I do and it cost the Republicans mightily--they almost lost the House.

Those conservative Christians, of which there are many in GA, have seen George Bush as a decent, honorable, principled leader that they want to support. They rewarded Republicans by turning out again in droves. They, along with the Reagan Democrats (blue collar and Catholics) gave the victory to the GOP on 11/5.
8 posted on 11/09/2002 4:10:45 PM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: randita
I recall that election well. I hope this one will be remembered for a lot of things, but the importance of good character in a leader is foremost.

The area I live in was probably 80% Democrat before Mr. Reagan- a Republican had virtually no chance of winning office, despite the fact that most Democrats here were very conservative. Now, you just about can't win if you call yourself a Dem...

I hope this election thoroughly rattles the entire political system in Georgia- it's been stagnant and hidebound for far too long.

9 posted on 11/09/2002 4:54:37 PM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
I didn't have an inkling either. It came out of the blue. From the looks of the local media, they didn't have an inkling either.

Cleland may be a "good guy", but I emailed him back when the partial birth abortion vote came up. I asked him to please not sign that horrendous bill. He emailed back a note saying it was the best for the mother.... plus some other nonsense he knows nothing about. If he believes that, then he has no business representing me.

As I went to vote Tuesday in the rain, I said "this trip is for Chambliss"!! Little did we know the ripples that would occur that day... and still happening.


10 posted on 11/09/2002 5:10:01 PM PST by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
I continue to be amazed at how many times I have seen journalists refer to this huge Republican victory as one in which we have "seized control of" the Senate, or of whatever Statehouse or legislative body we have won ELECTORALLY.

Making it sound like it was a coup d'etat apparently makes them more able to demonize the opposition.

Well, get used to it. The PEOPLE have spoken. They have shown the Democrats the door! Republicans did not "seize" anything. They were convincingly ELECTED to the positions of power and responsibility that they now hold.

Let us trust and hope that they lead prudently and wisely, and that they realize that they represent ALL of the citizenry, and not just those that voted for them.

11 posted on 11/09/2002 5:40:07 PM PST by Dan Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frnewsjunkie
Well, if- a big if- you had judged by the callers to "Straight Talk" ( and I'm well aware a statistician would call it too small, too regionalized, too locally-oriented to be useful ) you would have thought a revolution was brewing.

I did note this at the time to my wife- indeed, mentioned several times that it looked like "tumbrels & guillotines" times. I was inclined to think it was just local- people were being taxed to death, insulted by the politicians, and also ignored. A rather lethal mix for people depending on votes...

12 posted on 11/09/2002 5:42:27 PM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
but if war hero Cleland is vulnerable for resisting a president on the issue of homeland security, what Southern Democrat can feel safe in Congress?

Paging Mr. Breaux and Mr. Miller, you have a call on the party-switch line.

13 posted on 11/09/2002 5:50:07 PM PST by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I think it was just a bunch of Americans who don't want to see America attacked again like 9/11. We remember all who died and particularly watching poor souls jumping to their deaths to avoid being burned to death in a horrific manner. We remember.
14 posted on 11/09/2002 5:54:02 PM PST by maxwellp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: randita
"Those conservative Christians, of which there are many in GA, have seen George Bush as a decent, honorable, principled leader that they want to support. They rewarded Republicans by turning out again in droves."

And equally important to them was the rebuke and rejection of the Democrats for their support of the Clinton Administration and all the filth that it represented.

Barnes' support of radical environmentalists and their plans for the state to seize all of the hammocks and small islands on the Georgia coast, including those that are privately owned, also infuriated many Georgians and made many others wonder when the state would decide to seize their property.

15 posted on 11/09/2002 5:56:41 PM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: maxwellp
I have to agree with your sentiments here.

Americans were sleeping through the bc administration.
Americans were sleeping through the dems' takeover of the Senate.

Americans were sleeping through a lot, until 911. They went to church for a couple of weeks, and then it looked like they went back to sleep.

BUT.. we didn't forget those people who perished in 911. No one forgot those who jumped to their deaths. No one forgot those in the Pennsylvania field who perished after fighting for their lives.

And watching daschle stall everything ... watching the memorial service turn into a laughing fest for the dems....watching the dems run ramshod over law and constitution... to put their men into place... was a bit much even for the sleepers.

16 posted on 11/09/2002 6:34:47 PM PST by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: frnewsjunkie
Americans were sleeping through the bc administration.

More like they were watching their IRA balance and saying to hell with it,going to look the otherway. Almost worked, had Gore got in we would be in the soup lines right now.
17 posted on 11/09/2002 7:47:42 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: maxwellp
I think it was just a bunch of Americans who don't want to see America attacked again like 9/11. We remember all who died and particularly watching poor souls jumping to their deaths to avoid being burned to death in a horrific manner. We remember.

Amen!

Something the Democratic Party seemed very little concerned with.

They are more concerned with protecting their Union supporters then the Nation.

18 posted on 11/10/2002 2:41:27 AM PST by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
I don't know who Gus Cochran is, but I gotta say it sure is nice to see a calm, reasoned analysis of last Tuesday's election for once.
19 posted on 11/10/2002 2:44:51 AM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
I did have an inkling of how vast and profound it might be, from the oddest of sources... in the weeks before the election, I mentioned to my wife that I "had never heard so many callers, so angry" on local "talkback" radio...

I haven't seen any real talk about this anywhere, so I'll toss it out here: I think the fact that the Wellstone "memorial" had so much resonance across the nation is proof positive that the electorate is becoming slowly-but-surely more engaged, and that they're not doing it through the usual channels (NY Times, ABC CBS NBC, Time, Newsweek, etc). Think about it for a second: As hideous and evil as that rally was, it was still largely an event local to Minnesota. Yeah, it aired on the cable news channels and C-SPAN, but it still only got the usual 90 seconds on the evening news and a little blurb in the morning paper. Yet it was all people were talking about from coast to coast, from the moment it took place until well after the votes were cast and tallied. There's no way people outside of Minnesota would have known much of anything about that disgusting event if it hadn't been for all the "alternative" routes of information dissemination now available. And those new sources are largely either conservative-leaning or truly fair and balanced.

The entire nation found out. The entire nation was infuriated. The entire nation voted the bastards out. Because we were able to know.

20 posted on 11/10/2002 2:53:45 AM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson