Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IRAN: The Despotic Mullahs
efreedomnews.com ^ | 10/25/2002 | efreedomnews staff

Posted on 10/26/2002 12:35:14 AM PDT by efnwriter

efreedomnews         WAR ON TERRORISM - AN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVE
IRAN: The Despotic Mullahs
October 25, 2002
efreedomnews.com

On July 3, 2002 Michael Ledeen wrote in National Review Online:
[Link]

July 3, 2002 8:45 a.m.
The Iranian Time Bomb
A nation on the brink.

Iran hurtles toward chaos, and we are still dithering. July 9 will mark the third anniversary of the student uprising at Tehran University, and the capital is girding for new demonstrations against the increasingly unpopular and insecure regime of Ayatollah Khamenei. Two recent polls suffice to demonstrate the hatred of the Iranian people for their leaders, whether "hardline" or "reformist." The first, a secret survey carried out by the Interior Ministry for the ruling mullahs, found that only six percent of 16,000 people in Tehran said they were satisfied with the regime; the other 94 percent said they were unhappy with it. Moreover, nearly half of those polled — 45 percent — said it was impossible to reform the system and must be totally changed. In thinking about these striking numbers — as clear a picture of failure as any regime could dream of — it must be remembered that, if anything, the numbers understate the discontent of the people, since a number of them must have believed that the pollsters were really agents of the state, and that anyone who denounced the regime was liable to be arrested and tortured.

Elected President Khatami has become more impotent as his term in office goes by. The Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, has organized new police directly under his control to "reestablish social order and to fight against all forms of depravity" - meaning to physically and brutally enforce strict fundamentalist Islamic behavior - while the youth of Iran continues to organize and flaunt pro-Western "sinful behavior as listening to Western music, dancing together, drinking alcohol or, in the case of women, failure to wear appropriately Islamic garb."

On August 5, 2002, major demonstrations for democratic freedom took place in every major city in Iran, commemorating the establishment of a constitutional monarchy long before Ayatollah Khomeini and the Islamic fundamentalists deposed the Shah of Iran. The Revolutionary Guard and religious militia forces attacked the demonstrators to put down the demonstrations. National Review Online's Michael Ledeen reported:

"The regime responded with unprecedented violence. There was widespread street fighting. More than 1,000 people were arrested. Several were apparently killed. Even late on Tuesday conflicts were ongoing in Khorassan, and not a single word appeared in a major Western publication, or on the news wires, or on any television broadcast of which I am aware."

Not only has President Khatami been emasculated, but Khamenei's forces have jailed over 400 clerics from Qom who were followers of the two clerics who have openly challenged Khamenei, Ayatollahs Taheri and Montazeri.  The military has been purged of any officer not completely loyal to the mullahs.

Iran is backing attacks against the new fledgling government in Afghanistan and US troops there. Iran gave birth to Hezbollah, fully backs Islamic Jihad and Hamas. Al Qaida is strongly and safely entrenched, and fully supported within the Iranian borders. Despite the horrible war fought with Saddam Hussein in the 1980's, the current regime is openly assisting Saddam, selling him munitions, missiles and aircraft and condemning their common enemy, the United States. Along with Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Saudi Arabia are allies in maintaining their vicious despotic rule - and allied against the United States - not because they hate the United States per se - they hate the freedom and democracy the United States represents, and the threat that poses to their rule.

Khatami is powerless, a figurehead, but continues his public struggle to empower the elected side of the Iranian government. His real problem is not just that Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei is not about to allow the government to take away any of his power. The fact is, the Persian population, kept in check only by physical violence and fear, are no longer interested in Khatami's democratic version of Islamic rule. The Persian people see the current regime as unacceptable. They are demanding full democratic freedoms, unlike this twisted Islamic version of democracy, where women and non-Muslims are not equal, and human rights do not belong to dissidents.www.iranian.com/Satire/Cartoon/ 2000/March/ganji.html

Akbar GanjiAkbar Ganji, a jailed Iranian journalist, somehow released last month "The Islamic Republic of Iran," calling for civil disobedience, criticizing the original Islamic fundamentalist Ayatollah Khomeini for installing a theocracy after promising democracy, and stating, "So long as this system...is in place, there is no way for Iranians to acquire democracy."

More from Michael Ledeen:

"Like the Soviet empire and other failed tyrannies, Iran has a great capacity for evil outside their borders. Their Achilles' heel is at home, where their sway over the Iranian people grows weaker by the day. Although the regime is intensifying its repression against its critics, demonstrations continue apace throughout the major cities, and the open wound in the clerical body is getting ugly. In recent days, the celebrated Ayatollah Montazeri — the author of the famous fatwa a couple of months ago that condemned suicide bombing as an anti-Islamic action — wrote a letter to the newspaper Hambastegi in Tehran, saying that no one is obliged to support a religious government, since belief or disbelief in religious rule is not a crucial issue, either for good government or for good religion. This is yet another devastating attack against the religious legitimacy of the regime.

The UN has failed. On April 24, 2002, the United Nations Human Rights Commission in Geneva defeated an American resolution to condemn Iran for its many egregious actions against its own people. On April 23, 2002 "the regime hung six young men in public, under the pretext that they had "disturbed public order." [Iran on the Brink]

The Europeans placate the Iranian mullahs along with Saddam so that oil contracts worth billions can stay in place. The US is just as guilty for not standing up to the Sauds.

It is up to the United States, and her allies, to support the movement for freedom in Iran, to stop the despotism, internal and exported terrorism of the Iranian Mullahs, Saddam, the House of Saud, the Syrians and their puppet Lebanon. The worry of a "potential" all-out middle east war is unnecessary. The war is well underway. The worry is the lack of recognition by the politicians, the media, and the free people of the world.


Iran Despotic Mullahs



TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Free Republic; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: iran; islam; mullahs; revolution; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Iran - target # 3
1 posted on 10/26/2002 12:35:14 AM PDT by efnwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: efnwriter
Re #1

Saudi- target #4

2 posted on 10/26/2002 3:37:13 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: efnwriter
Iran has the best free thinkers aswell as the worst clerics in the region.Iran thrived in the arts and sciences before the arabs forced islam on the native persians.

Iran is the only hope for democracy in the middle east.No other country there could sustain it.The high level of activism in Iran is something that the neighbouring arabs will not adopt.

Whether or not the west does anything,Iran will free itself in time.



3 posted on 10/26/2002 3:52:09 AM PDT by libertarian_au
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: efnwriter
These theo-fascist governments are but crime syndicates. Islam dictates tyranny to subjugate the people. The opiate of the masses... all a akkk barf.
4 posted on 10/26/2002 4:39:01 AM PDT by SevenDaysInMay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SevenDaysInMay
These theo-fascist governments are but crime syndicates.

Is it any wonder the Democrat Party as presently constituted feels such a close affinity?

5 posted on 10/26/2002 6:04:14 AM PDT by Vigilanteman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: efnwriter
Irans 3rd generation needs our help.
7 posted on 10/26/2002 7:47:11 AM PDT by ChadGore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greasyHeart
Disco-Centric?
8 posted on 10/26/2002 9:54:14 AM PDT by efnwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: efnwriter; knighthawk
target #3

I hope not. The people want freedom -- from their government.

"It is up to the United States, and her allies, to support the movement for freedom in Iran, to stop the despotism, internal and exported terrorism of the Iranian Mullahs, Saddam, the House of Saud, the Syrians and their puppet Lebanon. The worry of a "potential" all-out middle east war is unnecessary. The war is well underway. The worry is the lack of recognition by the politicians, the media, and the free people of the world."

Pray for freedom for the people of Iran.

9 posted on 10/26/2002 1:34:39 PM PDT by Eala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: efnwriter
The US government has got to become much more aggressive toward Iran. A fine first step would be hiring the writers from South Park to do a weekly cartoon show based on kids of the leaders of Iran, and then flooding Iran's airspace with the program.
11 posted on 10/28/2002 7:24:05 PM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greasyHeart
You said:To my eyes, the Islamic Revolution is rebelling against the same WTO, NWO, disco-centric pop culture that most of us in America hate as well. The trouble is, the Islamic Revolution is happening UNTEMPERED by Christian values and Christian respect for human lives...and in your reply to my question on "disco-centric" condemned the drunken/wired US businessman's international image "exported by the WTO".

Do you really think the WTO,that can afford the best PR firms on Madison Avenue would choose to "export" that image? You are not wrong that many Americans (and europeans, Japanese and Chinese) drink to excess and in fact have institutionalized after hours "partying" as part of the business of doing business. But I doubt the WTO is spending any money to foster the image you describe.

While you concentrate on that US image, consider the image of "Tea Rooms" in the Arab countries where heavy lidded Muslims sit next to their hookah's stoned "to -the-Allah-belt", the image of babies with bomb belts, the image of "revolutionaries" with AK-47's and head scarves or balaclavas hiding their faces-do you blame the WTO for those images as propaganda?

Look, I am not condoning public drunkeness, etc - and I hated disco in the 70's (I was a "dead-head"and country fan)- but if you dislike bars you are bucking a century old trend in western culture. Drunkeness has been with us throughout history.In the middle east it is Hashish and opium - still "drunkeness" in my mind. The history of mankind is filled with man's attempts to alter his mind - to escape his reality. In the west it is alcohol - because it is legal. In the east it is drugs because they are "legal" and alcohol is not.

You said the problem with the islamic revolution is that it has no christian values. I think you have been propagandized to believe the leaders of the islamic fundamentalist movement actually are true believers. I find that America is an easy target as America is the only world power in existence. The fundamentalist islamics have their own agenda of turning the world into a pre-medieval horror show with them in charge. Whether they are "believers" in their religious zealotry I seriously doubt. I believe these men are no different than any other despotic megalomaniacs using religion, or like Hitler using nationalism and anti-semitism to blame the German economic problems on a convenient enemy. America is just a convenient enemy. The poverty and dissatisfaction of the third world is blamed on America and Israel (anti-semitism is alive and well, and if you wonder, I am not Jewish), defering the anger of the masses away from their despotic "leaders"

You are right that the WTO is exporting capitalism - but let me ask you a question: What other socio-economic concept has achieved a higher standard of living for more people in less time in the history of the world? A second question: What socio-economic concept would you suggest the WTO export instead in order to address the paralysing poverty of the third world?

12 posted on 10/29/2002 9:15:12 AM PST by efnwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: greasyHeart
Your reply to question #1What other socio-economic concept has achieved a higher standard of living for more people in less time in the history of the world?
"So, my answer is that the highest imaginable standard of living for the greatest number of people would be based on the kind of capitalism which emerges naturally from a society where the majority of the members are deeply and passionately Christian"

If your answer is "The Dissenters [who] themselves gave up on England, came to North America, and tried to duplicate the new society here. But, over the generations, the same kind of "Establishment creep" set in and the institutions which were founded on religious precepts were purged of those values." - then this failed so it has not "achieved a higher standard of living for more people in less time in the history of the world" than Western (US) capitalism.

Your answer to # 2: What socio-economic concept would you suggest the WTO export instead in order to address the paralysing poverty of the third world?
I posed the question because you criticised the WTO's "exportation" of capitalism.
Your answer was the WTO should not "export" anything. Well, that is not going to happen, so I find your "answer" inadequate.

Third, you campare OPEC to the US as a "world power". Yes, OPEC has significant economic power but this has been severely marginalized by oil exports from the former Soviet Union and South America. Besides, I was talking about military power - which, when used, makes economic power irrelevant (in the short term).

Overall, I see your devotion to Christianity (a good thing) limiting your vision regarding the realities of the world. We are discussing apples and oranges. I wish you well. The missionary efforts of Christians across the globe has been a quite successful humanitarian effort and in the long run can have a significant positive spiritual and economic impact. I suggest to you though, that rather than cast aside the non-faith based organizations of the world trying to achieve purely economic progress for the third world, that you embrace the positive impact these organizations can and do have and become more active with them rather than less. In this way you can impact those organizations with your Christian values. Remember "Render unto Ceasear what is Ceasar's." I think Jesus was a realist.

14 posted on 10/31/2002 10:04:01 AM PST by efnwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: greasyHeart
You are correct. I do not share your belief. Neither do billions of other people in the world. However, I am not willing to write those people off because they are "heathen". You now sound like a bigot - prejudiced against anthing and anyone non-Christian. How does that square with your religion?
16 posted on 11/01/2002 8:34:49 AM PST by efnwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: greasyHeart
You said:There are no compromises with the devil in regard to non faith-based organizations.

In doing so it sounds to me like you catagorically deny any positive impact of such organizations. To me, that catagorical denial sounds prejudiced. I used that "non-pc" word in its literal sense - not in an attempt to insult you. I can understand if you do not want any personal involvement with non-Christian organizations, but my point is that I see positive results from non-Christian organizations and I think you should give them their due.

Let me ask you - Can you accept a separation of conservative politics from Christianity? Can someone, in your opinion, truely be a conservative without being a Christian?

You said in an earlier post that the problem with Islamic Fundamentalism was their lack of Christian values. I don't disagree with that, but I think their real problem is the "FUNDAMENTALISM" itself - the inability to allow religious freedom as well as separation from and respect for the secular government separate from their religious laws.

18 posted on 11/02/2002 12:49:13 AM PST by efnwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: greasyHeart
...Imagine the kind of reporting today's "world press" would have done had they been around when Oliver Cromwell took over England. (And he was, more or less, a good guy...)...

May you be improved and uplifted by such a "good guy" (more or less) someday.

Perhaps if he had slaughtered 90% of the native population if Ireland instead of a mere 40% you would subtract the "less" and give him the "all around good guy" seal of numbskull approval.

There is a nauseating similarity between mohammedans and some protestants.

To you--and your spiritual brethren--I say, with all my heart: "SMASH THE ICON-SMASHERS".

20 posted on 11/02/2002 8:20:10 AM PST by LaBelleDameSansMerci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson