Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats in scramble to save Senate
The Scotsman ^ | 10/2/02 | Tim Cornwell

Posted on 10/01/2002 6:24:15 PM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection

FIVE weeks before elections that could hand control of the US senate to the Republican party of President George Bush, Democrats were on a desperate hunt yesterday for a new candidate in a critical seat.

The dramatic fall from grace of Senator Robert Torricelli, the flamboyant New Jersey Democrat also known as "The Torch", was confirmed on Monday night when he called off his re-election campaign.

But his departure from the knife-edge struggle for the Senate is threatening another titanic legal and political struggle over yet another American election - before the votes are even cast.

Claims by a jailed businessman that he showered the senator with cash and gifts in an old-fashioned case of political corruption had seen Mr Torricelli’s polls plummet ahead of the 5 November Senate elections.

The Democratic leadership, which currently controls the Senate by the tiny margin of 50 votes to 49, said it would announce a replacement within 48 hours. But Republicans vowed a court fight to stop a new candidate’s name going on the ballot.

Mr Torricelli, 51, shot to political stardom in the high-rolling Clinton era as a man with a golden touch and a glamorous personal life - including dating Bianca Jagger. He tapped wealthy friends to help raise hundreds of millions of dollars to fund Democrat politicians, including himself.

But he fell foul of claims that a businessman had illegally showered him with gifts of cash, Rolex watches, designer suits, and earrings for female friends. From being an easy favourite, his poll ratings this weekend saw him slump to up to 20 per cent behind his rival.

Close to tears, the career politician said he was stepping aside "to ensure that the Democratic Party can retain the seat", he said. "It is the most painful thing that I’ve ever done in my life."

The news has given a sudden lift to Republican hopes of retaking the US Senate this November, handing Mr Bush a clean sweep on the eve of a possible war on Iraq. The Republicans already have a majority in the lower House of Representatives, and are expected to hold on to it easily.

Mr Torricelli’s opponent, Doug Forrester, a business multi-millionaire, has poured at least $6 million of an estimated $50 million fortune into his campaign so far. He is vowing to fight any move to replace an opponent he has relentlessly pursued on the cash-for-favours scandal.

He immediately threatened to go to court, claiming local laws say no candidate can be replaced less than 51 days before an election.

"The laws of the state of New Jersey do not contain a ‘we think we’re going to lose so we get to pick someone new’ clause," he said.

Mitch Bainwol, a top Republican campaign official, added: "You can put somebody else on the ballot when somebody else has died, but political death does not qualify. He still has a pulse, which means he’s still on the ballot."

Larry Sabato, a leading US political analyst at the University of Virginia, confirmed yesterday to The Scotsman that Mr Torricelli and the Democrats’ bid to replace a failing candidate was unusual, to say the least.

"It’s unprecedented" in the history of the Senate, he said. The only previous case came from an election for the governor of the state of Minnesota in 1990, where a Republican caught in a scandal was forced out shortly before election day.

"His successor got on the ballot, and he won," said Mr Sabato. "This could easily happen in New Jersey, because it is a Democratic state, which is why the Republican is fighting so hard. If the Democrats get a well-known clean candidate, that person will probably win."

The Democratic leadership is said to be looking at one man in particular, a New Jersey congressman, Bob Menendez. If Republicans fought to block Mr Menendez, a Latino, they could be accused of race discrimination by a minority group the party has been assiduously courting.

Thirty-four of 100 Senate seats are up for grabs in November. US senators serve for six years, with a third of the members standing for election every two years.

If Mr Bush’s party wins the Senate, "it eliminates the largest part of the opposition to his plans for Iraq" and a lot of other things, said Mr Sabato.

In the US constitution, the Senate wields power over foreign policy and over the appointment of judges and supreme court justices, critical to conservatives long-running effort to have abortion declared illegal.

Several Senate seats are too close to call, but the New Jersey race could be decisive. "Literally, it is on the edge of the butter knife," said Mr Sabato. "That’s why this seat matters so much and why everybody brings out nuclear weapons: high-priced lawyers, court challenges, millions and millions of dollars of party money."

Mr Bush is among senior figures on both sides expected to campaign hard in New Jersey; Mr Torricelli was a close ally of Bill Clinton, and called him in London before deciding to step aside.

Mr Bush’s approval ratings in New Jersey run at about 60 per cent favourable, but his popularity is not as all-consuming there as in other parts of the US. The traditionally Democrat state has not elected a Republican senator for 20 years.

Mr Torricelli made his political career raising prodigious amounts of money, while dating the likes of Ms Jagger, vilifying Fidel Castro, and unlike many in his party backing the Gulf war.

But his reputation fell through the floor after jail-cell revelations by a businessman imprisoned for 18 months for making £40,000 in illegal donations to his campaigns.

David Chang claimed that he gave the senator everything from a £1,000 Persian rug to a CD player - along with an envelope stuffed with thousands of dollars in cash. Prosecutors said the evidence would not stand up in court, but the political damage was done. The affair has already earned an official Senate reprimand for Mr Torricelli.

Mr Chang called Mr Torricelli a "master criminal", in interviews broadcast on local TV.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 10/01/2002 6:24:15 PM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
WIPE THE SMILE OFF OF THIS MAN’S FACE.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate here by secure server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

2 posted on 10/01/2002 6:24:28 PM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Just Posted this to DU. See how it kills the party?

I always try to predict the enemy’s next move. Lets play devils advocate.



1) A new candidate means that the military need to be rushed new voting forms? Does this cancel the votes that they already cast? If we want to “count all the votes”, do we count these to?



2) I read that one county already spent upwards of 100 thousand dollars on ballots. Who should pay for the printing of new ones?



3) Republicans are way behind for the senate seat in MT. The deadline for getting on the ballot has passed. If the Republicans get their candidate to quit and want to replace him with the popular Mark Racicot, would we at DU support them in order to “give the People a choice”.



4) If all laws about ballot deadlines can be nullified, aren’t they meaningless? If the NJSC rules this way, how late is too late. Is this a precedent we want to start?



Once answer all these questions I think you will admit (like I Have) that this seat is lost!
3 posted on 10/01/2002 6:30:28 PM PDT by MikL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The Democratic leadership is said to be looking at one man in particular, a New Jersey congressman, Bob Menendez. If Republicans fought to block Mr Menendez, a Latino, they could be accused of race discrimination by a minority group the party has been assiduously courting.

Menendez is out - think Latenburg is the latest one to throw his hat in the ring... Hope the courts don't allow the tourch's name to be taken off the ballot. But I doubt it.
4 posted on 10/01/2002 6:30:55 PM PDT by rightinpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I find it interesting that the Torch backed out WHEN he did. It was apparent that he was going down in flames. But, what was the big headline of the day before he did his "Goodbye, It's all about me" withdrawl. The big news of the day was the dRATS in Baghdad. I know some liberals who were even ticked off about that. Big news, all of a sudden, it's overshadowed by something bigger. This is just a thought, not ready for the tin foil hats. Comments?
5 posted on 10/01/2002 6:32:41 PM PDT by feedback doctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightinpa
1) A new candidate means that the military need to be rushed new voting forms? Does this cancel the votes that they already cast? If we want to “count all the votes”, do we count these to?

Excellent idea.


2) I read that one county already spent upwards of 100 thousand dollars on ballots. Who should pay for the printing of new ones?

Corzine's got the $$$$


3) Republicans are way behind for the senate seat in MT. The deadline for getting on the ballot has passed. If the Republicans get their candidate to quit and want to replace him with the popular Mark Racicot, would we at DU support them in order to “give the People a choice”.

Yes.

4) If all laws about ballot deadlines can be nullified, aren’t they meaningless? If the NJSC rules this way, how late is too late. Is this a precedent we want to start?

No. But the RATS will in a heart beat.
6 posted on 10/01/2002 6:35:32 PM PDT by rightinpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: feedback doctor
I still think the torch might have pulled it off. Sounds crazy but NJ is really liberal.
7 posted on 10/01/2002 6:37:34 PM PDT by rightinpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
critical to conservatives long-running effort to have abortion declared illegal.

Elected Republicans are running away from that like scalded dogs.

David Chang claimed that he gave the senator everything from a £1,000 Persian rug to a CD player - along with an envelope stuffed with thousands of dollars in cash. Prosecutors said the evidence would not stand up in court,

-----

But his reputation fell through the floor after jail-cell revelations by a businessman imprisoned for 18 months for making £40,000 in illegal donations to his campaigns

The evidence stood up against Chang.

8 posted on 10/01/2002 6:39:41 PM PDT by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: feedback doctor
I'm with you. I noticed this too. They conviently got the Bagdhad Three off the radar, didn't they?
9 posted on 10/01/2002 6:43:06 PM PDT by I still care
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection; ffrancone; Brandonmark; Alex P. Keaton; MeeknMing; Dog Gone; Dog; ...
WANT TO TAKE BACK THE SENATE??

WANT TO SHOCK HILLARY?

THEN DO YOUR PART TODAY! GO TO:

TakeBackCongress.org

10 posted on 10/01/2002 6:43:09 PM PDT by ffrancone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightinpa
Welcome to FR, but I'm not sure the Torch has done anything but what he was told.
11 posted on 10/01/2002 6:43:32 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: feedback doctor
I find it interesting that the Torch backed out WHEN he did. It was apparent that he was going down in flames. But, what was the big headline of the day before he did his "Goodbye, It's all about me" withdrawl. The big news of the day was the dRATS in Baghdad. I know some liberals who were even ticked off about that. Big news, all of a sudden, it's overshadowed by something bigger. This is just a thought, not ready for the tin foil hats. Comments?
.............................................................

Ah, Ha!Now we may be getting somewhere. I have been thinking along the same lines, and the only thing that comes to mind is the "Builder" who seemed to have accompanied Torricelli to the 7-Eleven while Chang was there. Chang was described as terrified.

The Torch would not have used Bob the (knee breaker) Builder to try to shut up Chang. Would he? Do politicians do things like that?
12 posted on 10/01/2002 6:49:29 PM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: I still care
Interesting point, I agree.
13 posted on 10/01/2002 6:53:19 PM PDT by Ronin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ffrancone
Just remember this - so far - nothing has worked for the dems - nothing! Like Rush said, the public is flipping them off (in more ways than one).

This will not work either - but it does show exactly what we have been saying: "they will DO ANYTHING TO KEEP THEIR POWER!!

Even subvert the law!
14 posted on 10/01/2002 6:56:50 PM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
If Mr Bush’s party wins the Senate, "it eliminates the largest part of the opposition to his plans for Iraq" and a lot of other things, said Mr Sabato.

Iraq is so far down on these guys' radar screens it might as well not exist. The Dems are sweating only one thing - their ability to dictate new Supreme Court nominees. That's what this dogfight is all about.

15 posted on 10/01/2002 6:58:13 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
Not a builder..........a trash hauler buddy........in other words....'family' man.
16 posted on 10/01/2002 7:05:03 PM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MikL
FREE REPUBLIC FOLKS NOTE: MikL is a member as of 10/1/2002. Welcome aboard.
17 posted on 10/01/2002 7:07:47 PM PDT by encm(ss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
The Dems are sweating only one thing - their ability to dictate new Supreme Court nominees. That's what this dogfight is all about.

You speak the truth, Supreme Court justices influence 25+ years. The Dems CANNOT LET CONSTITUTIONALISTS ON THE SUPREME COURT.

Once they lose the Senate, they will still try to obstruct Judicial Appointments using the filibuster, mark my words. They will save the heavy artillery for the Supreme Court nominees.

Retake the Senate Now!!!


18 posted on 10/01/2002 7:08:04 PM PDT by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
CyberAnt:

Good to hear from you! It's been a while since FRIVA in Las Vegas.

You're right. We have the big mo' now.

19 posted on 10/01/2002 7:18:56 PM PDT by ffrancone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Right! This old memory of mine is often lacking, but I know if I throw something out on FR someone will correct me. It will not always be correct, but it WILL happen.

In your case, it is correct, and I thank you.
20 posted on 10/01/2002 7:25:42 PM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson