New Jersey Case Cite RE: What the Democrats Are Trying to Do

I don't know aristeides, but he seemed pretty certain about it. But it has to be done by Saturday. Someone with a law background and familiar with the NJ laws has to research this.

Torch may not have a choice if there is a gun to his head.

I am more concerned about this ballot access for Lautenberg. It cannot stand.

The dems had all the county workers who would lose their jobs call him to put the pressure on him.

Why would county workers lose their jobs if the Dem candidate for a Senate seat loses an election?

Hannity: Drudge flashes: Lautenberg now leading candidate; Pallone has changed his mind. This is getting hilarious.

What happens if they haven't picked a candidate by the time the NJ Supreme Court holds a hearing? For that matter, didn't they set a filing deadline for briefs by tomorrow? How will it look if the Dems' brief doesn't name the substitute candidate?

I guess because they're afraid that all the down ballot candidates would suffer and republican candidates would win the county spots. NJ must have some kind of patronage thing going, I don't know. I don't live anywhere near there. I just reported what the Judge said.

I know that they must have had some kind of ace up their sleeve.

LOL, moot point now. Although, maybe the dems will have one of those waste management contractors visit the Torch and he'll agree to resign anyway.

Please tell me the Republicans have this or someone is going to mail this to them P*L*E*A*S*E!

We're all sending it to anybody we can think of. You should, too.

Evidently Torricelli is STILl dealing.

Haha.....Charles Krauthammer on The Panel saying, "Even Democrats aren't that stupid."

I wonder.

How about 'holdonnow,' Mark Levin?

Hugh Hewitt just took this thread national on his radio show out in LA....

Freeper Research rocks!!!!!

This thread was just used on air by Hugh Hewitt ...in LA.

Howlin ......you were thanked personally by Hugh Hewitt on his show for posting this thread...

Great, has he learned to not be mono-toned yet by the way?

JOHN TOMASIN, PLAINTIFF, v. JAMES F. QUINN, HUDSON COUNTY CLERK AND ALL BALLOT CANDIDATES FOR PRIMARY ELECTION ON JUNE 7, 1977 AND THEIR CAMPAIGN WORKERS AND SUPPORTERS, DEFENDANTS

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division
150 N.J. Super. 593; 376 A.2d 233; 1977 N.J. Super. LEXIS 971
May 19, 1977, Decided

CASE SUMMARY

PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Petitioner county clerk sought the approval of the Superior Court of New Jersey of Hudson County, to transfer some candidates' names from column C to column B on the primary ballot for the upcoming election because of vacancies. Petitioner contended that county clerks possessed a large measure of discretion in arranging the primary election ballot.

OVERVIEW: Petitioner county clerk sought the approval of the court to transfer some candidates' names from column C to column B on the primary ballot for the upcoming election. Petitioner contended that the county clerks possessed a large measure of discretion in arranging the primary election ballot. The court declined its approval, holding that N.J. Stat. Ann. § 19:23-12 provided the means to fill a vacancy and its requirements must be satisfied before candidates names could be transferred from one column to another on the ballot as a result of the vacancies. The court reasoned that admittedly, the county clerks had a large measure of discretion in arranging the primary election ballot. The court concluded that where there was clear statutory direction of a specific procedure to be followed, the county clerk was governed thereby and had no discretionary authority; thus, absent compliance with § 19:23-12, the names could not be transferred.

OUTCOME: The court declined petitioner county clerk's request to transfer the names of candidates from column C to column B on the primary ballot, holding that there was no showing of prior compliance with the applicable statute and the county clerk did not have discretionary authority to make the transfer.

The county clerks have a large measure of discretion in arranging the primary election ballot. However, where there is clear statutory direction of a specific procedure to be followed, the county clerk is governed thereby and has no discretionary authority.

See N.J. Stat. Ann. § 19:23-12.

N.J. Stat. Ann. § 19:23-12 provides the means to fill a vacancy and its requirements must be satisfied.

N.J. Stat. Ann. § 19:23-17 provides that any designation of policy or faction on the primary ballot which includes a person's name is ineffective if the written consent of the person whose name is used is not filed with the petition of nomination of the candidate or groups of candidates requesting same.

There is a clear statutory declaration on how and when candidates can be transferred from one column to another.

COUNSEL:
Mr. Harold J. Ruvoldt, Jr., Hudson County Counsel, for petitioner James F. Quinn, Hudson County Clerk.
Mr. Benjamin H. Chodash, for the candidates designated as Column B on the ballot in Hudson County (Messrs. Kreiger & Chodash, attorneys).
Mr. Robert S. Raymar for Citizens for Byrne (Messrs. Hellring, Lindeman, Landau & Siegal, attorneys).
Mr. John J. Kot, for Democrats for Byrne (Messrs. Waters, McPherson & Hudzin, attorneys).
Mr. John L. McGoldrick, for Citizens for Hoffman (Messrs. McCarter & English, attorneys).
Mr. John Tomasin, pro se.

JUDGES: Kentz, J.S.C.

OPINION BY: KENTZ

OPINION: This matter arises by way of a verified petition of the County Clerk of Hudson County. Petitioner seeks the court's approval of the anticipated action of the county clerk to transfer from column C to column B on the primary ballot for the election on June 7, 1977 the names of Frank Rogers, a candidate for the State Senate, and Michael Adubato and John Cali, candidates for the State Assembly (hereinafter collectively the candidates), as requested in writing by these candidates.

A complaint and order to show cause was also filed by John Tomasin, campaign manager for column C, whereby an order is sought prohibiting this transfer of the candidates and for an order substituting Dominick J. Pugliese on the primary ballot for the office of Sheriff of Hudson County in place of Frederick W. Stevens, who has withdrawn his candidacy.

By consent of all the parties these two proceedings were consolidated and heard together.

The county clerk represents that since Paul T. Jordan has withdrawn his candidacy for the office of Governor of New Jersey and since he headed column C, the candidates no longer wish to remain in that column and have requested in writing that their names be transferred to column B which is headed by Ralph C. DeRose as candidate for the office of Governor. Admittedly, Jordan has publicly declared his support for Brendan T. Byrne, a candidate for Governor who is listed under column A. It is further represented that the candidates are not supporting candidate Byrne and are supporting candidate DeRose. In fact, some of these candidates appear on the DeRose line in another county. It is argued that if the transfer were allowed by the court, certain confusion that might very well exist in the minds of the voters would be eliminated and that they would not be misled, as they might be if the candidates remain in column C. Candidate DeRose has consented in writing to this transfer.

Petitioner argues that as county clerk he is charged with the responsibility of preparing the official ballots. N.J.S.A. 19:14-1. With respect to the requested transfer of the candidates, the county clerk asserts that there is no statutory expression as to whether he has the power to permit this transfer and therefore he has the discretionary authority to grant this request. See Hawks v. Gates, 129 N.J.L. 5, 11 (Sup. Ct. 1942).

Furthermore, the county clerk points out that by reason of such transfer there will be no discrimination or prejudice to the other candidates, and argues that a transfer by him at this time would not be clearly unreasonable. Richardson v. Caputo, 46 N.J. 3, 9 (1965).

On the other hand, the opposition maintains that there is clear and unambiguous statutory authority on this subject by which the county clerk's actions are governed. Furthermore, the opposition argues that the proposed transfer is not only a transfer from one column to another or only a removal or withdrawal therefrom, but is also the filling of a vacancy.

I conclude that there is merit to the arguments of the opposition and that the county clerk under the circumstances of this case does not have the discretionary authority to grant the requested transfer.

Admittedly, the county clerks have a large measure of discretion in arranging the primary election ballot. However, where there is clear statutory direction of a specific procedure to be followed, the county clerk is governed thereby and has no discretionary authority. See In re Hoffman, 134 N.J.L. 155 (Sup. Ct. 1946); Bado v. Gilfert, 13 N.J. Super. 363 (App. Div. 1951); Harrison v. Jones, 44 N.J. Super. 456 (App. Div. 1957).

It appears that N.J.S.A. 19:23-12 is clearly applicable here. It provides in pertinent part as follows:
This [vacancy] committee shall have power in case of death or resignation or otherwise of the person indorsed as a candidate in said petition to fill such vacancy by filing . . . a certificate of nomination to fill the vacancy.

The certificate so made shall be executed and sworn to by the members of such committee, and shall upon being filed at least thirty-four days before election have the same force and effect as the original petition of nomination for the primary election for the general election.

The county clerk here not only wishes to remove the candidates from a ballot slot but to transfer said candidates to another column and slot. Some of the slots now sought to be filled were originally occupied by candidates who have now withdrawn their candidacies. The remainder of the slots have never been filled. Therefore, as to the slots in column B which are sought to be filled at this time, there is a vacancy either by "resignation" or "otherwise." In either case, N.J.S.A. 19:23-12 provides the means to fill the vacancy and its requirements must be satisfied.

It is apparent that the anticipated action by the County Clerk does not meet the requirements set out in N.J.S.A. 19:23-12 since the proposed transfer of the candidates has not been approved by any committee on vacancies and since the 34-day time period for filling of vacancies has lapsed. See, In re Keogh-Dwyer, 106 N.J. Super. 567 (Law Div. 1969); Berry v. Gates, 129 N.J.L. 1 (Sup. Ct. 1942).

The opposition's arguments against transfer are buttressed by N.J.S.A. 19:23-17 which provides that any designation of policy or faction on the primary ballot which includes a person's name is ineffective if the written consent of the person whose name is used is not filed with the petition of nomination of the candidate or groups of candidates requesting same. MacManus v. Allan, 2 N.J. Super. 557 (Law Div. 1949). In the present case the written consent of candidate DeRose at this time to the transfer of the three candidates to his column and thus to the use of his name in the designation is ineffective because it was given subsequent to the filing of petitions of nomination by the three candidates.

Accordingly, considering these statutes in pari materia, it is evident that there is a clear statutory declaration on how and when candidates can be transferred from one column to another. Therefore, the county clerk has no discretion under the present circumstances to permit the requested transfer.

Similarly, N.J.S.A. 19:23-12 bars the substitution of Dominick J. Pugliese on the ballot in place of Frederick W. Stevens for the office of Sheriff of Hudson County. It is conceded that candidate Stevens withdrew his candidacy for this office within the past few days. The Committee on Vacancies has put forth Mr. Pugliese as a candidate for this office and seeks to have his name placed on the ballot. This is clearly in violation of N.J.S.A. 19:23-12 since the 34-day time period has lapsed. Accordingly, the application to substitute the name of Dominick J. Pugliese for Frederick W. Stevens for the office of Sheriff of Hudson County on the primary ballot for the forthcoming election is denied.

Good guess.

This thread was just used on air by Hugh Hewitt ...in LA.

GREAT! Can you sum up his remarks?

I don't get it. This case regarded a primary election; it wasn't statewide; it wasn't for a national office; and--most important--it was a lower court decision. Can you please explain the relevance?

Here it is Sandy in a nutshell it goes to point...they even bring up the deadline..

Similarly, N.J.S.A. 19:23-12 bars the substitution of Dominick J. Pugliese on the ballot in place of Frederick W. Stevens for the office of Sheriff of Hudson County. It is conceded that candidate Stevens withdrew his candidacy for this office within the past few days. The Committee on Vacancies has put forth Mr. Pugliese as a candidate for this office and seeks to have his name placed on the ballot. This is clearly in violation of N.J.S.A. 19:23-12 since the 34-day time period has lapsed. Accordingly, the application to substitute the name of Dominick J. Pugliese for Frederick W. Stevens for the office of Sheriff of Hudson County on the primary ballot for the forthcoming election is denied.