Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio man files $1.5M suit against Marriott
Knoxnews.com ^ | 25 September 2002 | Randy Kenner

Posted on 09/27/2002 6:25:41 AM PDT by SheLion

An Ohio man filed a $1.5 million lawsuit Tuesday against the Knoxville Marriott hotel after finding a hidden camera in a bathroom light fixture in July.

Bryan Brewer discovered the small video camera after noticing a tiny black spot - which he thought was an insect but turned out to be a hole - in the fixture, according to the lawsuit.

At the time Brewer, the vice president of a California company, was staying at the Marriott while on business.

His attorney, K.O. Herston, filed the lawsuit in Knox County Circuit Court. Named as defendants are Marriott International Inc. and Columbia Sussex Corp., a Fort Mitchell, Ky., corporation that operated at least 28 Marriotts with more than 8,500 rooms.

"The allegations have been turned over to the proper authorities, who we are cooperating with fully," said Doug Allen, the general manager of the downtown Marriott.

Allen declined to comment any further, citing an ongoing investigation by the Knox County Sheriff's Department. Brewer, contacted Tuesday, declined comment.

According to the lawsuit, Brewer, 27, discovered the camera on the morning of July 11.

"Thinking it might be an insect, Mr. Brewer swatted at the black spot, thereby inadvertently breaking the plastic cover on the light fixture," Herston wrote in the lawsuit. "He called the front desk, apologized and offered to pay for the fixture."

But while he was waiting for someone to fix the damage, Brewer noticed wires and discovered a small video camera.

A further look by security personnel confirmed that it was an elaborate, self-contained, video recording system.

"The video camera was connected to the bathroom light switch such that the camera would begin recording when the bathroom light was turned on and would stop recording when (it) was turned off," the lawsuit states.

Herston said that the equipment had a film of dust on it indicating that it had been there for some time. It also had a piece of tape on it indicating the room number, Room 253.

Herston said that Marriott employees let Brewer view the tape in their presence but refused to give it to him.

The tape and video equipment have been turned over to the Sheriff's Department.

The Sheriff's Department also has refused to give him the tape, Herston said.

He also said he's not sure why the Sheriff's Department is investigating the case since the Knoxville Police Department is next door to the Marriott.

Herston said the detective handling the case told him, "'All I know is that I was called to the scene and I responded to the call.'"

Marriott officials said they have inspected other rooms at the hotel but have refused to say what, if anything, was found, Herston said.

"There are a lot of questions and we need some answers," Herston said before adding, "How many other people were taped?"

Martha Dooley, a spokeswoman for the Sheriff's Department, said the reason the tape isn't being turned over is because, "It is an ongoing investigation."

As for the office handling the case, Dooley said, "We routinely answer calls from businesses and residences in the city as well as the county."

Someone from the hotel apparently called the Sheriff's Department directly.

KPD spokesman Darrell DeBusk said that KPD did not receive a call from the hotel.

The lawsuit contends that Brewer has suffered harm as a result of the discovery.

"In Mr. Brewer's case, he has become paranoid," Herston indicated. "He hates to travel now and that has caused tension at work since his job requires so much travel. When he does travel, he spends a lot of time going over every inch of his hotel room to make sure it is safe.

"This has really affected his career and well-being."

In addition to the $1.5 million in damages, Brewer also seeks the return of all copies of the videotaped recording of him.

Brewer has not been back in Knoxville since the incident.

"If he comes back, he certainly won't stay at the Marriott," Herston said.

Randy Kenner may be reached at 865-342-6305 or kenner@knews.com


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: camera; lawsuit; marriott; motels; privacy
Cameras Camera Everywhere.......


1 posted on 09/27/2002 6:25:41 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Gonna cost someone a bundle....
2 posted on 09/27/2002 6:33:02 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Gonna cost someone a bundle....

Isn't this sickening? I often wonder how many cameras are running behind those mirrors in the dressing rooms? You know the ones.........in the department stores when you go in to try on clothes? I often wondered who was watching me.

Gives me the chills.

3 posted on 09/27/2002 6:35:46 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Great scam: Hide a camera in your own room, "accidentally" break a light fixture to find it, sue for $1.5M.

Later guys, I have some shopping to do!

4 posted on 09/27/2002 6:37:36 AM PDT by Onelifetogive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Marriot's defense against this guys lawsuit:

"You think we were watching you? Look at you! No no, we only watch/tape the young hotties."

Case dismissed.

5 posted on 09/27/2002 6:43:06 AM PDT by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
Great scam: Hide a camera in your own room, "accidentally" break a light fixture to find it, sue for $1.5M.

Not quite that easy. They can easily tell if it was recently installed and if the tape has info prior to your stay. OTOH, check in under another name months earlier and then ....

6 posted on 09/27/2002 6:43:36 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
The important thing is the peeping-tom voyeur media got to show us Madelaine Toogood swatting her brat in that parking lot. Unless we have cameras trained on every square inch of public space somebody somewhere might get away with such horrible, horrible unforgivable behaviour.
7 posted on 09/27/2002 6:49:27 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
That would be beating her child in the parking lot.

Please don't pollute this thread with irrelevance.

It isn't the same thing.

8 posted on 09/27/2002 6:52:48 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
Apparently it wasn't a scam. See the original thread.
9 posted on 09/27/2002 6:53:39 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
This is so creepy! You always wonder about how your food is prepared, and by whom, in restaurants, and now this. Yuck!
10 posted on 09/27/2002 7:07:47 AM PDT by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Apparently it wasn't a scam.

Didn't say it was, just said it would be.

11 posted on 09/27/2002 7:09:28 AM PDT by Onelifetogive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
That would be beating her child in the parking lot.

Please don't pollute this thread with irrelevance.

It isn't the same thing.

It most certainly is the same thing, Your Pompousness.

Every little tittilating thing that happens in this world is your business, after all, in the National Enquirer sense of the term.

12 posted on 09/27/2002 7:11:49 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
I read but no one else has said it so..... Pictures?
13 posted on 09/27/2002 7:13:00 AM PDT by maximus@Nashville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Ah ha! But the first person recorded on the tape would be the one who checked into that room after you. Ergo, check the room records.

Not that I've thought about doing this, mind you.

14 posted on 09/27/2002 7:42:19 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Ah ha! But the first person recorded on the tape would be the one who checked into that room after you. Ergo, check the room records.

You noticed that I said check in using a false name. Sure, there will be a lot of details to fix, but if you are after 1.5m, then no big deal.

15 posted on 09/27/2002 8:06:09 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Several years ago there was a big bru-ha-ha over this very same thing. It was on the big news magazines on tv - 60 Minutes or Dateline or one of them.

It does make one wonder about the type of people either hired by or running the motel/hotels in the this country doesn't it?
16 posted on 09/27/2002 5:52:22 PM PDT by dixie sass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson