Skip to comments.
LAWFUL TO VIDEOTAPE WOMEN'S PANTIES
ABC NEWS
Posted on 09/23/2002 11:19:06 AM PDT by hoosierskypilot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: HardStarboard
Texas. Or Utah.
21
posted on
09/23/2002 11:52:02 AM PDT
by
Illbay
To: hoosierskypilot
In other news, Bill Clinton is moving to Washington state.
22
posted on
09/23/2002 11:58:45 AM PDT
by
steve-b
To: WindMinstrel
but they fail to understand the obvious: Up a skirt is not a public place.
I agree with the judge on this one. What about down a women's shirt? Who hasn't taken a peek when some women bends over to pick something up and their breasts are exposed? If caught, the perp should be beaten to a pulp and their video equipment smashed. This could become a very expensive hobby.
23
posted on
09/23/2002 12:03:34 PM PDT
by
LetsRok
To: Illbay
Agreed.
24
posted on
09/23/2002 12:05:14 PM PDT
by
Skooz
To: LetsRok
Exactly. If someone tries to look or videotape up my wife's (or daughter's) skirt, they will receive a thorough pounding. That's my job as husband/father.
Should such behavior be illegal? Of course. However, it isn't yet in that state. Laws should only be passed when there's a need, IMNHO. There's a demonstrable need now -- let the politicians earn their keep for a change. Hey, when they're passing valid laws like this they won't be able to raise taxes for a few days, right?
Comment #26 Removed by Moderator
To: Biker Scum
I think that's a pretty valid response to just about any post on FR. Maybe we can get JimRob to put that next to the disclaimer on every post?
To: WindMinstrel
but they fail to understand the obvious: Up a skirt is pubic place.
28
posted on
09/23/2002 12:20:10 PM PDT
by
Delbert
To: hoosierskypilot
Am I the only one who remembers the Benny Hill (I think) skit with the guy hanging around near a metal grill staircase on a ship?
He enjoys himself and calls a friend over, the friend smiles and takes his position.
The next person in a skirt to go up... is a man in a kilt! Oy!
29
posted on
09/23/2002 12:32:02 PM PDT
by
ikka
To: hoosierskypilot
Sounds like pants are in order here.
30
posted on
09/23/2002 1:11:48 PM PDT
by
AdA$tra
To: AdA$tra
Sounds like pants are in order here.
Or shorts under the skirt.
Or underwear with a message like "No Trespassing" or "Turn off the camera, you pervert."
To: hoosierskypilot
the state's voyeurism law doesn't apply because the women were taped in a public place, such as a park or shopping mall, where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy This is too ludicrous for words. If he videotaped women walking around topless or nude, I would agree. If you show it in public then you can't reasonably expect for it to be private. But to rule that you have no expectation of privacy UNDER your clothes?
To: Desdemona
Or shorts under the skirt.
...Or perhaps at least skirts long enough to hide the goods when climbing the stairs. Not that I am REALLY complaining here. If one does not want me to look, they might try and hide it at least a little.
33
posted on
09/23/2002 1:18:47 PM PDT
by
AdA$tra
To: hoosierskypilot; All
But what if the woman is walking up stairs or is on a second level balcony - like in a mall? I used to work in a mall like this and innocently saw all sorts of things(some I wished I hadn't) - but didn't film it with a camera.
To: AdA$tra
What, and hide the thighs?
Seriously, skirts can be too short - and even worse when you try to sit.
To: Bubba_Leroy
I am amazed that so many people here on FR do not understand how our legal system works.
The court ruled that the existing statute does not apply to 'upskirt-ing'. Now it is up to the legislature to amend the statute - no big deal. That is how the system is designed to work.
However, it would be nice if this court would apply the same judical restraint when conservative issues come before it.
To: hoosierskypilot
I've said it before. If I ever caught any slavering twit filming my wife's silkies, his next project would be his own colonoscopy.
37
posted on
09/23/2002 4:27:58 PM PDT
by
IronJack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson