Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush's War Plans Are a Cover-Up, Byrd Says
Charleston Gazette ^ | September 21, 2002 | Paul J. Nyden

Posted on 09/22/2002 8:52:44 PM PDT by syriacus

Sen. Robert C. Byrd, D-W.Va., said President Bush’s plans to invade Iraq are a conscious effort to distract public attention from growing problems at home.

“This administration, all of a sudden, wants to go to war with Iraq,” Byrd said. “The [political] polls are dropping, the domestic situation has problems.... So all of a sudden we have this war talk, war fervor, the bugles of war, drums of war, clouds of war.

“Don’t tell me that things suddenly went wrong. Back in August, the president had no plans.... Then all of a sudden this country is going to war,” Byrd told the Senate on Friday.

“Are politicians talking about the domestic situation, the stock market, weaknesses in the economy, jobs that are being lost, housing problems? No.”

Byrd warned of another Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. Passed on Aug. 7, 1964, that resolution handed President Lyndon Johnson broad powers to escalate the war in Vietnam, a conflict that cost 58,202 American lives and millions of Asian lives.

“Congress will be putting itself on the sidelines,” Byrd told the Senate. “Nothing would please this president more than having such a blank check handed to him.”

Byrd said his belief in the Constitution will prevent him from voting for Bush’s war resolution. “But I am finding that the Constitution is irrelevant to people of this administration.”

Sens. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., and Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., both praised Byrd after he spoke.

“It is the height of patriotism to ask such hard questions,” Clinton said. “No one exemplifies that more than the senior senator from West Virginia.”

Byrd said, “Before the nation is committed to war, before we send our sons and daughters to battle in faraway lands, there are critical questions that must be asked. To date, the answers from the administration have been less than satisfying.”

Byrd repeatedly said Bush has failed to give members of Congress any evidence about any immediate danger from Iraq. Byrd also criticized his speech to the United Nations.

“Instead of offering compelling evidence that the Iraqi regime had taken steps to advance its weapons program, the president offered the U.N. more of a warning than an appeal for support.

“Instead of using the forum of the U.N. General Assembly to offer evidence and proof of his claims, the president basically told the nations of the world that you are either with me, or against me,” Byrd said.

“We must not be hell-bent on an invasion until we have exhausted every other possible option to assess and eliminate Iraq’s supposed weapons of mass destruction program. We must not act alone. We must have the support of the world.”

Byrd said Congress needs solid evidence and answers to several specific questions, including: * Does Saddam Hussein pose an imminent threat to the U.S.? * Should the United States act alone? * What would be the repercussions in the Middle East and around the globe? * How many civilians would die in Iraq? * How many American forces would be involved? * How do we afford this war? * Will the U.S. respond with nuclear weapons if Saddam Hussein uses chemical or biological weapons against U.S. soldiers? * Does the U.S. have enough military and intelligence resources to fight wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, while mobilizing resources to prevent attacks on our own shores?

Byrd said the proposed resolution Bush sent Congress on Thursday would be the “broadest possible grant of war powers to any president in the history of our Republic. The resolution is a direct insult and an affront to the powers given to Congress.”

Byrd also criticized Bush’s request for power to carry out “pre-emptive attacks” and send troops to Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, the West Bank and anywhere else in the Middle East.

“I cannot believe the gall and the arrogance of the White House in requesting such a broad grant of war powers,” Byrd said. “This is the worst kind of election-year politics.”


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; US: West Virginia
KEYWORDS: byrd; hillary; iraq; patriotism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last
Coverup.

Doesn't Byrd think coverup is another word for "white hood?"

1 posted on 09/22/2002 8:52:44 PM PDT by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Making insinuations about the president's motives and claiming that he is trying to distract attention from 'domestic problems' is the "height of patriotism," claims Democrats.

What a bunch of opportunistic scum.

2 posted on 09/22/2002 8:57:00 PM PDT by Skwidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
...Byrd said his belief in the Constitution will prevent him from voting for Bush’s war resolution. “But I am finding that the Constitution is irrelevant to people of this administration.”

Byrd is an a$$. the democrat party has nothing but contempt for the constitution. Byrd is a complete 3ucking a$$!

3 posted on 09/22/2002 8:58:34 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
The old kleagle is afraid his rice bowl is going to be broken.
4 posted on 09/22/2002 9:00:20 PM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Sorta like this Mr ex Grand Dragon Byrd.
5 posted on 09/22/2002 9:00:53 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Is Senator Byrd off the reservation or is this a Democratic talking point? I assume that they wouldn't be dumb enough to play this one but I could be wrong.
6 posted on 09/22/2002 9:02:49 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weikel
That is the symbol of the Sourthern Klan, I think. Was Byrd in that branch?

Mister Byrd is denying the reality that Saddam need only farm out one nuke to Islamicists for detonation off the Lake coast of Chicago, to bring this nation to the brink if not the abyss of anarchy. Mister Byrd, it's time for you to go!

7 posted on 09/22/2002 9:04:19 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: weikel
The sheer brazen hypocricy of these people takes ones breath away. These are the same ones who found Saddam guilty and deserving of removal in 1998.
8 posted on 09/22/2002 9:05:25 PM PDT by prov1813man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Dunno about which branch wears which symbol Im not a Klan expert.
9 posted on 09/22/2002 9:06:28 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: weikel
I wonder how many lynchings of black people he supervised?
10 posted on 09/22/2002 9:07:49 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Well there you have it folks!! The RATS talking points!! I guess the EVIL AXIS are dictating the RATS talking points...FREAKIN UNBELIEVABLE!! I guess 9-11 was a figment of our imagination! And to think the american people are STILL willing to vote these BASTARDS in office is UNREAL!! SEEING RED IN TEXAS!!
11 posted on 09/22/2002 9:08:08 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
So Byrd is worried about the stock market. So does that mean he's going to vote for a capital gains tax cut?

No, didn't think so.

Byrd is a senile old coot. He's an embarrassment to himself, but let's hope he keeps coming on out and talking. The more he talks, the fewer seats the Rats will have in the Senate this coming January.

12 posted on 09/22/2002 9:08:23 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
How many civilians would die in Iraq?

Ooooo Ooooo I know! Raises Hand.
Only 1 or 2... maybe Jerry Rivers.

13 posted on 09/22/2002 9:09:05 PM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
Ooops...AXIS OF EVIL=EVIL AXIS...which ever take your pick
14 posted on 09/22/2002 9:09:51 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
“This administration, all of a sudden, wants to go to war with Iraq,” Byrd said. “The [political] polls are dropping, the domestic situation has problems.... So all of a sudden we have this war talk, war fervor, the bugles of war, drums of war, clouds of war.


15 posted on 09/22/2002 9:10:16 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker; prov1813man; MHGinTN
You know I can't believe the unbelievable stupidity of the Republican party that we don't advertise that one of the Top Dems was a grand Dragon in America's ghettoes round the clock.
16 posted on 09/22/2002 9:10:27 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Should the United States act alone?

Good point Senator Byrd, The administration has not done enough to enlist the support of "white trash". *nudge* *wink* You know what I mean Senator Byrd, don't you.

17 posted on 09/22/2002 9:12:02 PM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Isn't this the same Senator Byrd who, on national television, admitted that Clinton was guilty in impeachment, but that he would not vote to remove Clinton from office? Sounds like Mr 'I pull out my little copy of the Constitution whenever I get a traffic ticket' Byrd wouldn't vote properly even if the proof was Saddam admitting on CNN that he was responsible for the bomb that just leveled New York.
18 posted on 09/22/2002 9:13:07 PM PDT by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Byrd said Congress needs solid evidence and answers to several specific questions, including: * Does Saddam Hussein pose an imminent threat to the U.S.?

Ummmm Senator .. when Saddam passes his little bag of goodie to the Capital .. Will that be enough solid evidence??

19 posted on 09/22/2002 9:14:45 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Let's give Robert the "Byrd"!!!
20 posted on 09/22/2002 9:18:09 PM PDT by SolomonSemperFi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson