Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Bush Phoned Chinese, French, Russian Leaders?
The Peoples Daily (CCP B.S.) ^ | 09/10/02 | Li Heng

Posted on 09/10/2002 10:29:15 AM PDT by Enemy Of The State

Why Bush Phoned Chinese, French, Russian Leaders?

Under pressure from world opinion opposing military attacks against Iraq and honest admonitions from home and abroad, the Bush administration slightly pulled in its horns in pushing recklessly its unilateral policies.

September 6, George W. Bush phoned leaders of Russia, France and China, apparently hoping to rally support from the three UN Security Council permanent members for his actions for a "regime change" in Iraq.

Bush was reportedly given a cold shoulder by Vladimir Putin, who said the US's action, nevertheless, was badly grounded. Analysts said it is impossible for Russia not to consider the payment of huge debts Baghdad had owed to it, which may be affected by the planned war. While China and France have long been holding a rather reserved attitude toward the Iraq issue. Then why the ever pretentious Bush administration suddenly played such a diplomatic trick?

Bush's unilateral policies after taking office was found intolerable even by traditional diplomat Henry A Kissinger. In his famous book "Does America Need a Foreign Policy?" written in 2001, Kissinger expressed his opinion that a foreign policy is still necessary even for the world only super power. But Bush's unilateral actions have invited many criticisms and opposition during past two years, with the latest one being fierce attacks from government representatives and those of non-governmental organizations on the US government's policy against the earth environment at the Earth Summit, or the World Summit on Sustainable Development.

It must be pointed out Bush's headstrong behavior has become headaches to many of US allies. The best example is British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who believes Bush paid little attention to his methods over many issues. As both regard Saddam as a "grave menace", Blair and Bush show no big odds over the Iraq question. But Blair seems obviously clearer by advising the US to set a deadline for Iraq through the UN, and strike if Saddam refuses to surrender. For Blair knows by heart no war should be fought without a solid moral ground and regardless of mainstream public opinion of the whole world.

Bush's telephones are also a result of domestic politics. The midterm election coming on November is the number one consideration of his cohort and the Iraq issue must help the republicans to win instead of the contrary. Facing attacks from the Democratic Party as well as a depressed economy, how would Bush make the fullest use of Iraq to win the election? As a result, Bush put off the issue until September and at the same time discussed it with other members of the Security Council. At home Bush went to the Capital Hill to convince those deputies and abroad he went through the UN, so as to make his people more prepared and therefore gather greater support at home.

Bush's reckless, pretentious and selfish unilateral policy not only gave headaches to his allies, but also threatened the unity between his country and Europe. Under huge pressure from both home and abroad, Bush has to restrain a little on the Iraq issue. But the situation is still not optimistic, for we can see the Bush administration is forcing his logic on his own people as well as the rest of the world, only in a way seemingly more "proper" and "cleverer".



By PD Online Staff Member Li Heng


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/10/2002 10:29:15 AM PDT by Enemy Of The State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Only the Chinese would give a crap what Kissassinger had to say...
2 posted on 09/10/2002 10:30:09 AM PDT by Enemy Of The State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Bush: WHAZZZUUUUPP

Shoot me now please.
3 posted on 09/10/2002 10:31:33 AM PDT by Saturnalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Most of our "allies" will willing go along once they extort enough cash from us. Who cares what China thinks? They are going to do what they think is in their best interest regardless of what we think about it, and we should too.
4 posted on 09/10/2002 10:36:56 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Why people's daily printed stupid articles?
Can not they see this is series?
5 posted on 09/10/2002 10:39:36 AM PDT by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sanchmo
WTF???
6 posted on 09/10/2002 12:08:28 PM PDT by wallcrawlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Like Google, apparently the word "Did" has been banned by the Chinese govt. And this time a mirror site won't help.
7 posted on 09/10/2002 12:31:15 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Enemy Of The State
The only reason Bush phoned these leaders is so that the Democrats and Europhiles would be forced to stop screaming that he hadn't. Now, on to real issues...
9 posted on 09/10/2002 2:11:39 PM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76
And when they helped both Taliban and Al Qaida, AFTER 9/11!
10 posted on 09/10/2002 6:26:13 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State; Orion78; lavaroise; JanL; skemper
Indeed! I wonder about "the China card." I have always wondered about it. I even wonder about whether or not the "great schism" (e.g. between the USSR and the PRC) was really a war / skirmish, or, something very "special" packaged specifically for Western consumption. I just LOVE overturning very old rocks.... you never know what might crawl out...I urge you all to try it... you'll like it!
11 posted on 09/10/2002 6:30:25 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson