Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.N. considers face-lift
Washington Times ^ | 8/23/02 | Betsy Pisik

Posted on 08/22/2002 11:09:16 PM PDT by kattracks

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:56:30 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

NEW YORK

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
I sincerely hope the UN gets a brand news building, anywhere but in the US!
1 posted on 08/22/2002 11:09:16 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
face-lift?

Try complete gutting and overhaul. A face-lift by definition is superficial.
2 posted on 08/22/2002 11:13:34 PM PDT by Bogey78O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I feel comfortably sure that NY will not issue a building permit for this. Or am I off the deep end?
3 posted on 08/22/2002 11:16:56 PM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Face-lift? I know just the doctor. .....Kevorkian.
4 posted on 08/22/2002 11:20:32 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Stay in the current building while building a new structure in a developing country. Then let us have our property back.
5 posted on 08/22/2002 11:23:17 PM PDT by Ruth A.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Greenland sounds like a good place to relocate the U.N or Anarticia. Now is a good chance to move the U.N. out of the U.S. I think it's time for another nation to be it's janitor. It's been a liabilty to our nation long enough.
6 posted on 08/22/2002 11:29:52 PM PDT by cva66snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Build it in downtown Kabul..
It won't cost as much.
7 posted on 08/22/2002 11:48:56 PM PDT by GoldMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Utilities and repair costs could top $2 billion over 25 years and still leave the building with crumbling masonry and antiquated systems."

Seeing how the the Empire State building is almost 20 years older I would how they manage? Shouldn't it be 'crumbling' also.
8 posted on 08/23/2002 12:02:25 AM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The glass-and-marble Secretariat Building was constructed in 1949, before computers or terrorism or high energy costs. Today, many of its systems are obsolete, and maintenance is becoming difficult and disproportionately expensive.

Those costs are borne by all member states, with the United States paying just over one-fifth of the total. ...

U.N. officials are hoping — somewhat unrealistically, they acknowledge — that a government, foundation or billionaire will step forward with an interest-free loan as the United States did in 1949 to finance the original construction.

Failing that, they are hoping for a new and separate assessment of dues from governments willing to shoulder the extra expense.

Summary of the above: The US made this whole entity possible, politically and economically, back in 1949, and though it is only one nation among hundreds, has paid over 20% of all infrastructure costs for the UN ever since. Nevertheless, the UN will always hate America and continue to gripe about the US not paying even more in the form of dues.

Speaking of dues, we (the UN) are hoping the US will just buy us a big new building like they did before, but if not we will raise dues to cover it. Oh yeah, dues are apportioned disproportionately to the good 'ol US, so if you dont donate it we'll basically create a new dues structure to steal it from you. Have a nice day.

9 posted on 08/23/2002 12:05:15 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
It might be, if there was as much hot air and BS circulating through it as there is at the UN.
10 posted on 08/23/2002 12:05:38 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
U.N. IS ON PRIME PROPERTY. JUST THINK HOW MUCH REVENUE N.Y. CAN PULL IN, BY REPLACING THAT UGLY BUILDING WITH CONDOMINUIMS FOR THE RICH LIBERALS.
11 posted on 08/23/2002 12:34:44 AM PDT by missmanhattan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
You're off the deep end. Bumbug, Hitlery, and Chucky will see that the building permit(s) are approved in a NY taxicub minute.

Not ONE DIME for these SLIME. Let Atta Jr. use these worthless structures for target practice (yeah, yeah, I know, that's rude in front of the anniversary of 9-11...so let's instead just pretend E. 47th St and FDR drive is an abandoned warehouse in Harlem.

12 posted on 08/23/2002 12:38:36 AM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

13 posted on 08/23/2002 12:38:48 AM PDT by Militiaman7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

To Kofie and your U.N. cronies:

When Americans were dying and being dragged through the streets of Mogadishu, you were criticizing America for "being agressive to the people of Somalia and Africa."

Now you want, what, a few thousands of millions so you and your staff can have new digs?

Failing that, they are hoping for a new and separate assessment of dues from governments willing to shoulder the extra expense.

Oh, let's not mince words, shall we? By this you mean: U.S. Taxpayers!!! Because, we all know we can expect $3.42 from Africa and the 3rd world--so let America pay, correct?

14 posted on 08/23/2002 2:21:50 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
That picture makes me angry. Why does the united states welcome these people to their shores? Maine recently accepted refugees from somalia.
15 posted on 08/23/2002 2:32:30 AM PDT by bok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bok
Why does the united states welcome these people to their shores?

I am of Irish, German, Russian descent. I remember my grandmother speaking German to my father once, and I was amazed. I had never heard her do that before, she only spoke in English.

My father explained that she never used her native tongue, except on rare occasions, because she said "I am an American, now, we are American now, do you understand me?"

The diplomatic squatters on 42nd street hate our nation. They envy our blessed land, and they always will. The monsters that destoyed the WTC center last year targeted those structure specifically: they were something their own nations could never hope to conceive or to build themselves.

Alas, the U.N. blood suckers will get their new $1,300,000,000 building. In fact, I have no illusions that they will get a $2,600,000,000 building if they covet one.

16 posted on 08/23/2002 2:49:44 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Maybe the U.N. diplomats could relocate to this country..................the rent is cheap and they don't have those terrible "Judeo-Christian values" that they despise so much......................











17 posted on 08/23/2002 2:54:38 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Somalia would be a great location and they wouldn't have to wipe out a playground 'for the chillun.'

The quickest way to renovate would be to remove that godawful gun-tied-in-nazis sculpture.

18 posted on 08/23/2002 2:57:47 AM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Among the most urgently needed improvements is the repair or replacement of the building's distinctive glass walls, which leak heat and cool air as well as water.

Maybe they should have attended to their own affairs before criticizing the US on Kyoto?

19 posted on 08/23/2002 3:01:30 AM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoldMan
Why spend money for a new building, there are miles and miles of sewers in New York. They would provide conditions more suited to the perverts now taking up space above ground.

This works for me !!!

20 posted on 08/23/2002 3:22:48 AM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson