Posted on 07/16/2002 8:41:55 AM PDT by dalereed
Market's late rebound may revive manipulation rumors
July 16, 2002
Yesterday's late-hour market snapback is certain to rekindle rumors that the major stock market indexes are manipulated at crucial times – possibly with the Treasury or Federal Reserve as a conspirator.
Whether those rumors are true or not – and I believe they probably are – there is no question that yesterday's late recovery did not involve small investors: It was an institutional phenomenon.
The reason that questions will be asked is that market breadth was much worse than the performance of the indexes. For example, on the New York Stock Exchange, losers topped gainers 3 to 1, although the Dow Jones industrial average was down only 0.5 percent and the Standard & Poor's 500 down only 0.4 percent.
The Dow was down 440 at one point; a steep ascent in the last hour and a half trimmed the loss to 45.34.
It was somewhat reminiscent of Oct. 20, 1987, the day after the huge market crash, when stocks were plunging a second day, but suddenly recovered and closed up 100. But losers topped gainers 3 to 1.
It was widely assumed at that time that index futures were manipulated, perhaps with the connivance of the Fed. It worked. Markets recovered.
Skeptics believe that when the market is sinking too fast, the Fed and/or Treasury call the big houses on Wall Street and tell them to buy index futures and options. The short sellers – who bet the market will go down – immediately smell a manipulation, and hurriedly cover their shorts by buying stocks. Then buyers, believing there is a rally afoot, jump in.
Down volume doubled up volume on the New York Stock Exchange, says Kennedy Gammage of La Jolla's Richland Report. Such statistics "suggest the crisis-control team was at work," he says.
In response to a command from Washington, D.C., the large Wall Street houses bought call options on indexes and on the stocks that have the most weight in the indexes, he says. The houses also buy futures, he says.
European markets closed down 5 percent yesterday, well before the U.S. exchanges closed. The dollar was weak. Foreigners have been pulling money out of U.S. stocks. "The smart money in Europe is skeptical about our markets," says Gammage. Early in today's session, market technicians will try to determine whether overseas money is buying or selling.
"Barring any kind of news that would influence things one way or another, Europe will recover (today)," says E. James Welsh of Carlsbad's Welsh Money Management. He believes yesterday's rally was rigged. "Obviously, somebody came in and did purchasing of S&P (Standard & Poor's) futures," says Welsh.
"It could have been the Fed or the Treasury – as surreptitiously as possible," he says. Then the shorts covered, buyers jumped aboard and stocks zoomed back. The rally could continue, "But the ultimate low in this bear market is quite a bit lower."
Richard Russell of La Jolla's Dow Theory Letters says, "Maybe you can't call it manipulation," but a lot of mutual funds, some huge, jumped in and did buying.
He's skeptical of the rally gathering much momentum. "When you get a big down day and a recovery during the day, it has to go to a plus day, otherwise they are burning up ammunition," he says. "We just saw them burning ammunition."
He's not sure if there is a crisis-control team. Other countries such as Japan openly buy stocks to prop up the market. And many countries try to drive their own currencies up or down.
"Large institutional investors came into the futures area, it spilled over into short covering, and then there was bargain-hunting," says Tom Clutinger of Clutinger Williams & Verhoye.
But although it might have been a technical move yesterday, he believes that stocks are near a bottom and the long bear market – one of history's worst – is near an end. "If there is a summer rally, we will have corporate news to support it," he says.
Cossey Ernest Frank Cossey, former chief executive of TLC America, was sentenced to 57 months in prison yesterday by U.S. District Judge Napoleon A. Jones Jr.
Investors were told they would make 12 to 15 percent a year putting money into largely rundown real estate properties being fixed for resale. TLC raised $146 million from 1,850 mainly elderly investors. But he was spending the money on a lavish lifestyle; it was a Ponzi scheme, in which early investors are paid off with funds from later investors, according to Denise L. Rubin, head of Internal Revenue Service criminal investigations here.
Cossey also placed $20 million of investors' funds into a prime bank note scheme, in which investors are promised huge returns through rapid-fire trading of financial paper offshore, according to Daniel E. Butcher, the assistant U.S. attorney who handled the case.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Don Bauder: (619) 293-1523; don.bauder@uniontrib.com
Copyright 2002 Union-Tribune Publishing Co.
I have always believe that program trading should be banned because of this, but a lot of people perfer to trust the program that was designed by a human more than their own instincts.
When the Dow is in full crash mode, that's not "little investors" causing it, it's big investors. Little investors likely don't even realize that people can and do profit in a DOWN market (short sellers, e.g.).
I wonder what the political contributions of the big brokerages and mutual fund companies look like? Couldn't be that they go mostly to Dems, could it? Couldn't be that these scumbags artificially propped up the market during the Klinton years of Fraud and Deceit, and are now doing the opposite in order to harm the economy and G.W.B. and Congressional Republicans as we come up on the 2002 elections?
Anyone who naively believes that the market is driven by small investors and that no manipulation occurs had better not even be in the market, because they are going to get burned bad.
DWG
Hardly a conspiracy theory. The "Working Group" was formed after the 1987 crash. Manipulation of index options and the futures market is observable.
Here is a Washington Post article from February 23, 1997 titled the Plunge Protection Team.
Labeling stock market manipulation as a "conspiracy theory" is lazy.
This is exactly what the Asst Dean of Emory U's biz school said this morning. He was also bashing the "analysts". "Were they selling furniture before they became an analyst"?
Sure. Uncle calls the brokerage and proposes something unethical and illegal. Brokerage president invites Uncle to perch and rotate on the "finger of friendship." Uncle applies pressure. Tape recording of phone call mysteriously turns up at the editorial offices of the New York Times, Washington Post, Washington Times, Barrons, and Fortune. O'Neill spends several days trying to defuse the issue before getting fired.
Instead, an inexplicable rally in the index occurred, even though the overall market was broadly lower. There is no rational reason for it except that it was intervention. I'm not really opposed to that. The air needs to be let out of this market in manageable steps, not in a very short time.
Somebody tell me again why it's not a good idea to require government to get its revenue, not through taxation, but through investment and speculation in the markets? Because you don't want the government dominating and manipulating free markets, right? Well, guess what? . . . It does anyway.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.