Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

At Least 30 Afghans Reported Killed by U.S. Bombing (Not 100's as reported earlier)
Reuters ^ | July 01, 2002 05:16 PM ET | Nick Macfie

Posted on 07/01/2002 7:44:07 PM PDT by Jean S

(Reuters) - A U.S. plane bombed a village in the central Afghan province of Uruzgan on Monday killing at least 30 members of a wedding party and injuring many more, Afghan officials and residents said.

U.S. military officials confirmed there had been civilian casualties and said the incident was being investigated.

The bombing happened at 1 a.m. Monday in a village in the mountainous region 105 miles northeast of the southern city of Kandahar, residents said. They told the local Pashtu service of the BBC at least 120 people had been either killed or wounded.

An Afghan Defense Ministry official said celebrants were firing into the air, as is traditional in Pashtun weddings.

The official, Dr. Gulbuddin, told Reuters: "More than 30 people were killed. It was a wedding ceremony ... Americans have confessed that they made a mistake."

The U.S. military's Central Command said from its headquarters in Tampa, Florida, that U.S. B-52 and AC-130 attack aircraft struck targets in the dark, including anti-aircraft artillery that was firing at western warplanes.

"A fact-finding team comprised of officials from the U.S. military, the Afghan government, the American embassy and media representatives will conduct an immediate on-site assessment of the incident," the Central Command, responsible for the U.S. military effort in Afghanistan, said.



BOMB MISSED TARGET

In Washington, the Pentagon said at least one bomb dropped by Western warplanes had missed its target in southern Afghanistan on Monday, but that it could not confirm claims that members of a wedding party had been killed.

U.S. Army Colonel Roger King, speaking at Bagram air base in Eastern Afghanistan, said a coalition reconnaissance operation came under anti-aircraft fire overnight north of Kandahar and had responded with close air support.

"We understand there were some civilian casualties during the operation. We do not yet know how many casualties or how they occurred," he told reporters.

King said four injured civilians had been evacuated by U.S. forces and were being treated.

"The U.S. government extends its deepest sympathies to those who may have lost loved ones or who may have suffered any injuries," he said. "Coalition military forces take extraordinary measures to protect against civilian casualties."

Villager Abdul Saboor told the BBC: "We managed to transfer some of the wounded to Kandahar in the morning. Some of the foreigners' choppers also came to help.

"There are no Taliban or al Qaeda or Arabs here. These people were all civilians, women and children."

The Pakistan-based Afghan Islamic Press (AIP) reported that at least 100 people, mainly women, were killed. Quoting sources in the nearby Helmand and Kandahar provinces, it said: "The number of dead and injured could be more than 300."

It said the area was the ancestral home of Mullah Mohammad Omar, leader of the vanquished Taliban, and that U.S. forces had launched an operation there several days ago in search of him.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai told the local Bakhtar Information Agency the "sudden attack" happened in the Dehrawud district of Uruzgan province.

"We are trying to organize aid and a commission has gone there headed by the Ministry of Frontiers Affairs," he said.

The United States launched air strikes in Afghanistan last year against the al Qaeda network of Islamic militant Osama bin Laden, blamed for the September 11 attacks on Washington and New York, and the group's Taliban protectors.

There have been several reports of the United States mistakenly attacking civilian targets in Afghanistan.

In May, the U.S. army rejected reports it had mistakenly attacked a wedding party after AIP reported that U.S. planes had pounded the village of Bul Khil in Khost province after mistaking traditional firing at a wedding for an attack.

One recent military investigation found that a U.S. fighter pilot did not follow procedures when he mistakenly bombed Canadian troops in Afghanistan in April, killing four soldiers and injuring eight.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: southasialist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 07/01/2002 7:44:07 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JeanS
It's always so sad when a bar miztpah, oops, wedding party is attacked.

Leni

2 posted on 07/01/2002 7:49:06 PM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Hey I feel better, we only killed 30 innocent civilians!
3 posted on 07/01/2002 8:08:28 PM PDT by hangin' chad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: *southasia_list
Bump
5 posted on 07/01/2002 8:13:29 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Funny....I heard a report that this happened at 2 in the MORNING! Seems kinda funny to be having a weding party then.
6 posted on 07/01/2002 8:20:15 PM PDT by Jewels1091
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: michellcraig
The AP reported that the operation started at 2 a.m. and lasted FOR 2 HOURS and involved B-52 and AC-130 aircraft.

7 posted on 07/01/2002 8:20:50 PM PDT by gulfwarvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jewels1091
Some wedding parties in Jersey go on round the clock for 2 days. A drunken nutfest.
8 posted on 07/01/2002 8:22:30 PM PDT by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
(Reuters) - A U.S. plane bombed a village in the central Afghan province of Uruzgan on Monday killing at least 30 members of a wedding party ...

O-B-L was taking on yet another wifey???

9 posted on 07/01/2002 8:25:20 PM PDT by dodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dodger
Maybe they'll think twice about firing into the air to celebrate weddings in Afghanistan.
10 posted on 07/01/2002 8:43:18 PM PDT by gulfwarvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
HMMMMM. Good thing George Bush did not sign up for the International Court. This might have been the first case for the the Libs would try to bring before the court. Parley
11 posted on 07/01/2002 8:48:16 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gulfwarvet
Maybe they'll think twice about firing into the air to celebrate weddings in Afghanistan.

Absolutely. It's traditional in wartime to shoot back when fired upon. I don't know about anyone else, but if I'm flying over a foreign countryside and for whatever reason there is groundfire below, the presumption is hostility; I'm shooting back.

12 posted on 07/01/2002 8:58:53 PM PDT by Marauder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Marauder
...whatever reason there is groundfire below, the presumption is hostility; I'm shooting back....

The Court thanks you for that testimony, Lt. Calley.

13 posted on 07/02/2002 12:32:59 AM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
celebrants were firing into the air, as is traditional in Pashtun weddings.

These people are idiots. Someone needs to familiarize them with the teachings of one Sir Isaac Newton.

14 posted on 07/02/2002 12:39:48 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
The Court thanks you for that testimony, Lt. Calley.

A little exagerrated don't you think? Comparing this to My Lai? These Afghans were, infact, armed. They were, in fact, shooting up into the air while planes were flying. Uncle Darwin strikes again (with the help of U.S. airpower).

15 posted on 07/02/2002 12:45:10 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gulfwarvet
Maybe they'll think twice about firing into the air to celebrate weddings in Afghanistan.

Or at least not their anti-aircraft artillery.

16 posted on 07/02/2002 12:54:42 AM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kalashnikov_68
..a little exagerrated don't you think?...

Perhaps. But there's a fair question there, too : on what grounds is Afghanistan still a free-fire zone for US airpower? They've elected a new Parliament, right?

17 posted on 07/02/2002 1:13:36 AM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
on what grounds is Afghanistan still a free-fire zone for US airpower?

While I hold the Afghans in no high regard, you do have a point. The Taliban has been obliterated. Osama is likely dead. WTF are we still doing there?

Afghanistan is an ugly, inhospitable place. The media has painted our Afghan allies in a sympathetic light but we all know better. The Afghans in general and the Pashtuns in particular are an uncivilized, barbaric, savage lot who place no value on human life. The longer the U.S. remains there, the more likely we are to find this out for ourselves in vivid color.

It is good that they elected their own parliament. While I hope it works out for them I am not going to hold my breath. Their's is a culture that worships death (like the rest of their mohammedan brethren).

18 posted on 07/02/2002 1:30:51 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Okay, put yourself in that situation: You're in command of an airborne weapon during wartime, and you are responsible for the lives of your crewmen as well as a multimillion-dollar warbird. You are informed of weapons fire from the ground, directed at your ship. Do you wait for confirmation that it is hostile fire, thus risking not only the lives of your crew and your own - not to mention the airplane, or shoot back?

19 posted on 07/03/2002 12:15:32 PM PDT by Marauder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: zarf
Some wedding parties in Jersey go on round the clock for 2 days. A drunken nutfest.

Don't know about Afganastan but I know in Morocco they last for several days. Those weddings could get pretty interesting..

20 posted on 07/03/2002 12:34:30 PM PDT by Texas Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson