Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Allowing gifted students to skip high school in Calfornia
Contra Costa Times ^ | June 19, 2002

Posted on 06/19/2002 9:13:59 AM PDT by Lizavetta

Edited on 04/13/2004 3:29:27 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

SACRAMENTO - California's brightest students might be allowed to skip from elementary school directly to college, missing high school altogether, under legislation recently approved by the Assembly.

Students of any age, even as young as kindergarten, could take the state's high school proficiency examination under the bill, AB2607, written by Assemblywoman Lynne Leach, R-Walnut Creek.


(Excerpt) Read more at bayarea.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: California
KEYWORDS: education; schools
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
As much as I think that today's high school is often nothing more than extended day care, I'm not sure I like this idea.
1 posted on 06/19/2002 9:14:00 AM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
To me this says more about the quality of high school and undergraduate programs than about the intelligence of gifted primary school students.
2 posted on 06/19/2002 9:16:39 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
I'm surprised that you don't like it! I think it will be really beneficial to homeschoolers....bump
3 posted on 06/19/2002 9:18:56 AM PDT by Born in a Rage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
Remember, this is a bill regarding the California schools. There is quite a bit of evidence showing that starting with pre-K, the longer you stay in the California public schools, the less you know.
4 posted on 06/19/2002 9:20:10 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
What? This is just another one of the lewinskis that the Legislature regularly gives the teachers' unions, the same unions that slavishly fund the democrats and do their bidding. Here, if we allow the brightest to skip high school (or part of it) and go directly to college, then, we leave, how shall I put this, the not so brightest to be educated. By arguing that the brightest have been skimmed off, the teachers then claim that the continuing drop in public school performance is not of their doing, but an artifact of the data inputs. Let even ONE bright kid skip and ALL the teachers will shift the blame. Blackout Davis wants a million from the teachers' unions, then he's going to have to give them something worth the bribe.
5 posted on 06/19/2002 9:29:44 AM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
In theory, I like this idea.
6 posted on 06/19/2002 9:30:17 AM PDT by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Lizavetta
But critics say the bill could worsen crowding at many community colleges, and they fear some young children, though brilliant academically, might not be ready socially or emotionally to mix with students who are much older.

Educrats are not interested in academics, they want to use public schools to promote socialism and sexualization. The call this "socialization".

8 posted on 06/19/2002 9:43:21 AM PDT by moyden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
Why not just test all the students and promote each of them to the appropriate grade level?
9 posted on 06/19/2002 9:47:51 AM PDT by balrog666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
When I think back on all the cr*p I learned in high school, It's amazing I can still think at all.

Or something like that.

P. Simon

10 posted on 06/19/2002 9:51:12 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
This is the fix for a long-standing problem. In the period of 1700-1800s....you simply had to pass an exam and progress to next level or graduate. Everyone got into this attitude that you had to do it gradually in a 12-year period. It is quiet obvious that 5 percent of kids today are bored completely because of their capable level and they need to progress to a higher knowledge level. Why waste time and man-hours? Let the kid move up a year or two. If we could graduate 50 percent of all kids in 11 years or less...think of the savings across the whole spectrum. Fewer teachers, fewer classrooms, fewer problems.
11 posted on 06/19/2002 9:56:37 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2Jedismom
ping
12 posted on 06/19/2002 10:00:24 AM PDT by TxBec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
But critics say the bill could worsen crowding at many community colleges,

The California secondary education system is already in the midst of an event dubbed "Tidal Wave II". UC, CSU and CCC enrollment will increase 36% from 2000 to 2010. By 2010, 25% of all College students in the nation will attend school in California.

13 posted on 06/19/2002 10:01:14 AM PDT by socal_parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
Passage of the proficiency test, which measures reading, writing and arithmetic skills, would allow students to enter community colleges as if they had obtained their high school diplomas.

I don’t know if this is an issue or not. You may need a diploma to officially enroll, I don’t know. I have known several people that were high school freshmen that enrolled in community college courses and received credit for those classes from both the community college and the high school.

The only problem they encountered was getting a special deal to leave the high school campus early to attend the classes off campus, but I think it only required parental permission and a signature from the admissions office to verify that they had enrolled in the class.

14 posted on 06/19/2002 10:11:15 AM PDT by thatsnotnice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
I was one of these kids. I got through HS in two years by doing an entire year of work each summer, graduating just after my 16th birthday and on to college for summer term. I was socially hopeless and without a clue, and it's the best move I could have made. You always win when your peer group is more mature than you are.
15 posted on 06/19/2002 10:28:58 AM PDT by Technocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
This is just another one of the lewinskis that the Legislature regularly gives the teachers' unions, the same unions that slavishly fund the democrats and do their bidding

If this is the same Lynne Leach I'm thinking of, she was the conservative candidate for the Supt. of Public Instruction in March, and she does support independent homeschooling.

16 posted on 06/19/2002 10:41:19 AM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
I know, instead of high school, we could send them to Yemen to learn Arabic.

SD

17 posted on 06/19/2002 10:47:31 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
Why not just test all the students and promote each of them to the appropriate grade level?

Not a bad idea. I hope they still allow the smart kids to skip high school, even if the idea to test all students is not put into play.

18 posted on 06/19/2002 11:55:39 AM PDT by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Technocrat
I was one of these kids. I got through HS in two years by doing an entire year of work each summer, graduating just after my 16th birthday and on to college for summer term.

Good for you! I wish more kids would do this.

19 posted on 06/19/2002 11:58:26 AM PDT by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
As someone with a high IQ, I love this idea. I absolutely loathed high school due to all the teasing and what-not. If I could have gone to a place where I was treated more as an adult, I'm sure I would have done better academically.

As it was, I hated college because it was reviewing the same subjects I'd already learned in high school, which strikes me as an insane waste of time and money.

That's why I dropped out; the material didn't strike me as worth learning. If I'd been learning it for the first time, I would have been a lot less dissatisfied and a great deal more likely to have completed school.

D

20 posted on 06/19/2002 1:17:00 PM PDT by daviddennis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson