Posted on 06/13/2002 7:57:30 PM PDT by vannrox
How depraved is the act of defiling a corpse? What about bombing a building at the time of maximum occupancy? Such unsavory questions constitute the Depravity Scale, an attempt to define “heinous, depraved, atrocious and cruel” behavior. Michael Welner, M.D., is the scale’s architect. Welner is also chairman of the Forensic Panel, editor in chief of The Forensic Echo and associate professor of psychiatry at New York University.
Kaja Perina: How do you define depravity?
Michael Welner: It’s an intentional act that by virtue of its motivation, activities and associated attitudes reflects sadism, blood lust and a contempt or self-absorption with regard to its effect on the victim.
KP: Why do we need this scale?
MW: Cases come up in which the defense contests someone having committed a “heinous” or “vile” crime—over the definition of the word. They are saying that the court’s determination is arbitrary. If this keeps coming up at the appellate level, then we’ve got a problem. Also, in criminal and civil cases the standard for words such as “outrageous” may be different from one state to the next, and the jury just says, “How do I feel about this?” It should be the jury’s decision. But it should be driven by relevant evidence, rather than by an emotional argument that may come down to the lawyer’s skills.
KP: But aren’t responses to the Depravity Scale ultimately based on emotion?
MW: The points are presented equally to everyone. People see the same examples, and that’s one of the reasons we need a large sample size.
KP: Have previous attempts been made to standardize these terms?
MW: There have been flirtations with psychiatry’s ability to define evil, but that’s as far as it goes. There’s a sense of, “Can we approach this, because its so theological?”
KP: Is psychiatry viewed as traditionally siding with the defense? If so, will your scale remedy that perception?
MW: Yes. Psychiatry only enters the equation of a criminal case at the request of a defense attorney. A prosecutor can only bring psychiatry in to rebut what a defense attorney raises. So I want to make sure that the scale is nondenominational and not just another tool that’s raised to be rebutted.
KP: How does September 11 factor into the Depravity Scale?
MW: People look at the hijackers and readily attach this spectrum of depravity. But they’re overlooking the very real possibility that these people were brainwashed, much the way destructive cult followers are. So are we dealing with depravity, or with an act of war? Is bin Laden psychopathic and depraved in his actions, or is he simply an Islamic populist?
Go to www.depravityscale.org to answer the questionnaire
Free Republic is funded solely by donations from readers.
Donations and official correspondence should be mailed to:
Free Republic, LLC, PO Box 9771, Fresno, CA 93794
Support Free Republic by secure credit card.
Send PayPal direct to JimRob@psnw.com
He's back....
heliotrope evil
“heinous, depraved, atrocious and cruel”Damn, I thought this was yet another thread about THE SCUMBAG'S legacy.
Why, surely just an islamic populist! Which means...that...moslems LIKE his message of hate, killing and death.
And if they like doing that sort of thing, and in fact DO that sort of thing, then are they not mad dogs?
Which begs the question: "What does one do with a pack of murderous mad dogs?"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.