Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN Treaty on Women - ACTION ALERT
C-Fam ^ | June 5, 2002 | Austin Ruse

Posted on 06/05/2002 12:54:41 PM PDT by madfly

From email:

Dear Colleague,

If you have not done so yet, call the White House right now and tell them to "Un-Sign CEDAW."
(pronounced See-Daw, rhymes with Hee-Haw).

CEDAW (Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women) is the most dangerous treaty the US has ever considered ratifying. Some call it the ERA on steroids, or the ERA with a vengeance. CEDAW seeks to drive women from the home and to drive children into day care.
CEDAW seeks to eliminate Mother's Day.
Sounds crazy, but its true.

The CEDAW committee has

Pressured China to legalize prostitution
Pressured Kyrgyzstan to legalize lesbianism
Criticized Ireland for being too Catholic
Pressured Ireland to legalize abortion
Pressued Belarus to cancel Mother's Day
Pressured Libya to reinterpret the Koran to fall within CEDAW guidelines

Some in the US government are attempting to get us to ratify this treaty.
This must be stopped.

Right now, as we speak, the Bush Administration is determining its position on CEDAW. You can affect that position by calling the White House and saying, "Un-Sign CEDAW." (Rhymes with Hee-Haw). The number is
202-456-1111. They are waiting for your call.
Do it now!

And for added impact, email Secretary of State Colin Powell at
secretary@state.gov
and write, "Mr. Secretary, Un-Sign CEDAW."

Do these things right now.
THEY are deciding.
WE can stop the radicals right in their tracks.
Do it.

Call the White House at 202-456-1111 and email the Secretary of State at secretary@state.gov and tell them "Un-Sign CEDAW."

And tell all your friends. SPREAD THE WORD.

Yours sincerely,

Austin Ruse
President
C-FAM



TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catholicism; cedaw; genderneutrality; homosexuality; koran; mothersday; prostitution; terrorwar; womensrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Right now, as we speak, the Bush Administration is determining its position on CEDAW. You can affect that position by calling the White House and saying, "Un-Sign CEDAW." (Rhymes with Hee-Haw). The number is
202-456-1111. They are waiting for your call.
Do it now!

And for added impact, email Secretary of State Colin Powell at
secretary@state.gov
and write, "Mr. Secretary, Un-Sign CEDAW."

Do these things right now.
THEY are deciding.
WE can stop the radicals right in their tracks.
Do it.

Call the White House


21 posted on 06/05/2002 2:13:27 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
BTTT
22 posted on 06/05/2002 2:14:39 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: madfly, Nick Danger
I don't know abou the prostitution thing, I couldn't even find a reference to the sex trade or prostitution in the CEDAW TOCs except for "Trade in Persons," and they seem to be against that. But this [MSWORD DOC] Outline: Men, Masculinities and Development report from a CEDAW sub-committee certainly gives one a glimpse into one slice of their agenda:
"Resistance to the emerging global capitalist order has been similarly mobilized by appealing to biological determinist notions of masculinity. Scholars have pointed out the ways in which religious fundamentalism and ethnic nationalism use local cultural symbols to express regional resistance to incorporation by a larger, dominant power (see especially Jurgensmeyer 1995 and Barber 1995). These religious and ethnic expressions are often manifest as gender revolts, and include a virulent resurgence of domestic patriarchy (or militant misogyny); the problematization of global masculinities or neighboring masculinities (as in the former Yugoslavia); and the overt symbolic efforts to claim a distinct "manhood" along religious or ethnic lines to which others do not have access and which will restore manhood to the formerly privileged. In effect, masculinity becomes a rhetorical currency by which opposition to global integration, state centralization and increasing ethnic heterogeneity can be mobilized. In such cases, we expect to find ideas of traditional, local masculinities and their accompanying hierarchies reaffirmed. Typically, as Connell notes (1998: 17), "hardline masculine fundamentalism goes together with a marked anti-internationalism"."
This is another one of those examples of feminist activism where if you take the word "man" and replaced it with the word "Jew" or "Black" you would assume that you were reading something spewed out by the PLA or the KKK. This is the real reason you want to get on the horn and tell your congresscritter to oppose this bigoted piece of international socialist garbage before their chivalry hormones kick in and somebody convinces them that it's "for the children."
23 posted on 06/05/2002 2:14:47 PM PDT by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly; 4wvueers; 9mmmel; AriFan; autumn; BlackbirdSST; bzrd; ConservaChick...
Thanks for pinging me on this. I just received a response letter from Mr. UN boondoggle-grandpappy-gave-them-their-land-in-NY-and-they-owe-us-billions-in-unpaid-parking-tickets-sinator Rockef***er on this after I wrote him expressing my opposition to it.


Thank you for being in touch with me with your thoughts on the United Nations
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against
Women (CEDAW) Treaty.


The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
against Women is an international bill of rights for women. It is based
on the premise that in many parts of the world, women have not enjoyed, to the
same extent as men, the basic rights and protections outlined in
international human rights agreements and conventions. CEDAW brings
together, in a single comprehensive human rights treaty, the provisions of
previous United Nations' instruments concerning discrimination on
the basis of sex, and extends them to create a tool dedicated to the
elimination of all forms of discrimination against women.


The Convention requires States Parties to eliminate discrimination
against women in the areas of civil, political, economic, and cultural rights.
It also establishes measures for States to pursue to achieve equal
protection for women and men of their human rights. States are obliged to work
for equality in public life, for example, in the realm of legal status and
political participation, and also in private life and customs. For
example, in pursuing CEDAW's goals, States Parties are encouraged to
introduce measures to prevent the unhealthy practice of genital mutilation.


The Convention was adopted by the U.N. General Assembly in December 1979.
Ratification was rapid, and Treaty came into force on September 3, 1981.
As I am sure you are aware, today 169 countries - more than two-thirds of the
members of the United Nations - are party to the Convention. The
Carter Administration signed it in July 1980, and it has been waiting for
Senate approval since that time.


CEDAW's goals are very ambitious, and it will certainly take a great deal of
time, patience, and focus to achieve them. Some critics oppose the notion of
an international convention to guarantee women's rights around the world. I
support the concept of trying to ensure that women around the world receive
basic rights similar to those guaranteed to every American under our own Bill
of Rights. For many years, American missionaries, religious organizations, and
other Americans have worked hard to promote the rights and protections that
American citizens enjoy. I hope the deliberations on CEDAW will provide an
opportunity to review whether this Treaty can serve the same purpose.


Because of some of the questions and misconceptions about CEDAW, I think it is
important to share what the Treaty is not about. This Treaty is
not designed to push for radical changes. It addresses the importance
of equality for women throughout the world - whether they are in traditional
families or working to provide for their families on their own. I believe that
it is critical for the United States to be supportive of women's equality around
the world. CEDAW does not impose a radical or even specific agenda, but
instead encourages all countries to promote higher standards of treatment and
protection for women. It does not promote "same-sex marriages," which at
any rate are prohibited in the United States by the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).


I appreciate hearing from you, and I want to be very sensitive to your
concerns and interests when CDAW is deliberated in the Senate. In light of
the many different views and perspectives that exist in West Virginia and
around the world towards issues like this, I hope we can continue finding
common, constructive ways to strengthen the lives of women around the world,
and particularly in countries where women do not enjoy the most basic of human
rights. Again, thank you so much for sharing your views.


Sincerely,


John D. Rockefeller IV

How dare Rockef***er use "The Bill of Rights" and "the U.N." in the same letter!!

24 posted on 06/05/2002 2:17:20 PM PDT by RFP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2jedismom
Ultimately, individual freedom - for both men and women - is better served by keeping power close to home. Sovereignty and rights to self-determination are as important to women as to men. The Optional Protocol to CEDAW attempts, more than any previous protocol, to limit sovereign rights, and will impinge on freedom and fundamental rights if applied as urged by the CEDAW Committee.
25 posted on 06/05/2002 2:18:29 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Nobody likes being forced to 'think' as the liberals dictate they should. Forcing someone to think contrary to their conscience creates hate.

Hate creates violence.

Violence creates war.

The poltically correct say they do it to SAVE humanity, but the very thing they say they're trying to prevent is mulitplying in stregth every day because of political correctness docturine.

There's more hate in the world today because of political correctness and the thought police than ever before.

The liberals are out to destroy America.
Either by other nations deciding they've had enough of the liberal crap, or simply from within.
Either way, they're killing us. They're signing all our death warrents.

"Ten nations will gather together in secret and come against Babylon the great and destroy her. The kings of the earth who have grown rich off her luxeries will mourn. Merchant ships will dare not go near her shores."

26 posted on 06/05/2002 2:21:04 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Thanks for the ping madfly!!

To Armenia: “The Committee strongly urged the Government to use the education system and the electronic media to combat the traditional stereotype of women 'in the noble role of mother.'”

To Belarus: “The Committee is concerned by the continuing prevalence of sex–role stereotypes and by the reintroduction of such symbols as Mother's Day and a Mother's Award, which it sees as encouraging women's traditional roles.” CEDAW also condemned legislation in Georgia that “overemphasizes the role of women as mothers…[and] promotes the role of man as breadwinner.” CEDAW admonished Croatia and the Czech Republic for similar reasons.

These two REALLY, REALLY, REALLY frosted my underalls!! How dare someone presume to speak for all us "women" in this perverted fashion!! They realize that a great many of us are perfectly happy and content to fulfill our TRADITIONAL roles as wives and mothers and to be sheltered and loved by our husbands and they also realize that unless they pass laws that will put us out of the visible loop in favor of the lesbians and other deviants over at NOW, they will never actually get the Orwellian, gender-neutral world that they crave. OVER MY DEAD BODY!! Getting on the phone to Washington NOW.

27 posted on 06/05/2002 2:21:26 PM PDT by KentuckyWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: madfly
CEDAW seeks to drive women from the home and to drive children into day care.

How could they do that?

28 posted on 06/05/2002 2:22:46 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Freedom Is Worth Fighting For !!

Molon Labe !!

29 posted on 06/05/2002 2:23:05 PM PDT by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: garv
Those who want the treaty passed say it's nothing more sinister than a genuine effort to give women the rights they deserve, especially in the developing world.
"The right to healthcare, the right to education, the right to participate effectively in political decision making, the right to property and the right to vote … These are the fundamental human rights," said Leila Milani of the Coalition for Equal Rights.

We're overstepping our boundries. Who are we to tell others what rights they should have or not? This bothers me.

30 posted on 06/05/2002 2:30:06 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Harrison Bergeron
Another tidbit... the last paragraph of the report:

I translate this as "Straight men bad, gay men good."

31 posted on 06/05/2002 2:32:44 PM PDT by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RFP
Good for you. Where had you heard about this when you wrote him.?

We really need to ambush Powell.

32 posted on 06/05/2002 2:44:51 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: KentuckyWoman
You go Girl!! And this IS for the children, for the human race. Take the UN out of the US and vice versa!
33 posted on 06/05/2002 2:47:37 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Wow they want to legalize prostitution finally a UN feminazi document with something good about it. Still I'm sure its bad overall.
34 posted on 06/05/2002 2:48:08 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KentuckyWoman
You would be amazed at the amount of brow beating my wife - a stay-at-home mom - receives from her own mother and most all of her so-called friends to put our two year old son into daycare "just to get a break" or to "socialize him." It's like one of those science fiction stories where everybody is a pod but us and they have to keep working on us. I'm waiting for them to encircle the house some night, all zomby eyed, arms forward, lumbering gate, the whole nine yards of horror movie schtick. Maybe we should put a picture of Dr. Laura in our front yard to ward them off.
35 posted on 06/05/2002 2:48:11 PM PDT by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: weikel
If the good news is endorsement of legalizing prostitution (which I doubt - it would seem they just want to intervene in the associated health issues), then the bad news is that heterosexuality and masculinity will become illegal.
36 posted on 06/05/2002 2:53:23 PM PDT by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: amom, ALL

Right now, as we speak, the Bush Administration is determining its position on CEDAW. You can affect that position by calling the White House and saying, "Un-Sign CEDAW." (Rhymes with Hee-Haw). The number is
202-456-1111. They are waiting for your call.
Do it now!

And for added impact, email Secretary of State Colin Powell at
secretary@state.gov
and write, "Mr. Secretary, Un-Sign CEDAW."

Do these things right now.
THEY are deciding.
WE can stop the radicals right in their tracks.
Do it. Call the White House



37 posted on 06/05/2002 2:54:33 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Harrison Bergeron
Like I said it was bad overall. They already tried to outlaw masculinity whaddaya think "hostile enviroment" sexual harassment laws are.
38 posted on 06/05/2002 2:59:17 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Economist_MA
Actually, both are true. The UN pressured China to legalize prostitution because it's already so rampant, they want the 'sex workers' to be able to organize and collect state benefits. And they released a study on Belarus suggesting that, among other things, the country scale back (not necessarily cancel) its observation of Mother's Day because there is 'too much focus on motherhood as the main societally accepted lifestyle choice for women,' or some crap like that. I don't remember the exact quote, but I'll bet you can find it here at FR.
39 posted on 06/05/2002 3:25:32 PM PDT by LibertyGirl77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Bump!! This is an after dinner project. Actually probably tomorrow,
40 posted on 06/05/2002 3:30:30 PM PDT by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson