Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: madfly; 4wvueers; 9mmmel; AriFan; autumn; BlackbirdSST; bzrd; ConservaChick...
Thanks for pinging me on this. I just received a response letter from Mr. UN boondoggle-grandpappy-gave-them-their-land-in-NY-and-they-owe-us-billions-in-unpaid-parking-tickets-sinator Rockef***er on this after I wrote him expressing my opposition to it.


Thank you for being in touch with me with your thoughts on the United Nations
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against
Women (CEDAW) Treaty.


The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
against Women is an international bill of rights for women. It is based
on the premise that in many parts of the world, women have not enjoyed, to the
same extent as men, the basic rights and protections outlined in
international human rights agreements and conventions. CEDAW brings
together, in a single comprehensive human rights treaty, the provisions of
previous United Nations' instruments concerning discrimination on
the basis of sex, and extends them to create a tool dedicated to the
elimination of all forms of discrimination against women.


The Convention requires States Parties to eliminate discrimination
against women in the areas of civil, political, economic, and cultural rights.
It also establishes measures for States to pursue to achieve equal
protection for women and men of their human rights. States are obliged to work
for equality in public life, for example, in the realm of legal status and
political participation, and also in private life and customs. For
example, in pursuing CEDAW's goals, States Parties are encouraged to
introduce measures to prevent the unhealthy practice of genital mutilation.


The Convention was adopted by the U.N. General Assembly in December 1979.
Ratification was rapid, and Treaty came into force on September 3, 1981.
As I am sure you are aware, today 169 countries - more than two-thirds of the
members of the United Nations - are party to the Convention. The
Carter Administration signed it in July 1980, and it has been waiting for
Senate approval since that time.


CEDAW's goals are very ambitious, and it will certainly take a great deal of
time, patience, and focus to achieve them. Some critics oppose the notion of
an international convention to guarantee women's rights around the world. I
support the concept of trying to ensure that women around the world receive
basic rights similar to those guaranteed to every American under our own Bill
of Rights. For many years, American missionaries, religious organizations, and
other Americans have worked hard to promote the rights and protections that
American citizens enjoy. I hope the deliberations on CEDAW will provide an
opportunity to review whether this Treaty can serve the same purpose.


Because of some of the questions and misconceptions about CEDAW, I think it is
important to share what the Treaty is not about. This Treaty is
not designed to push for radical changes. It addresses the importance
of equality for women throughout the world - whether they are in traditional
families or working to provide for their families on their own. I believe that
it is critical for the United States to be supportive of women's equality around
the world. CEDAW does not impose a radical or even specific agenda, but
instead encourages all countries to promote higher standards of treatment and
protection for women. It does not promote "same-sex marriages," which at
any rate are prohibited in the United States by the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).


I appreciate hearing from you, and I want to be very sensitive to your
concerns and interests when CDAW is deliberated in the Senate. In light of
the many different views and perspectives that exist in West Virginia and
around the world towards issues like this, I hope we can continue finding
common, constructive ways to strengthen the lives of women around the world,
and particularly in countries where women do not enjoy the most basic of human
rights. Again, thank you so much for sharing your views.


Sincerely,


John D. Rockefeller IV

How dare Rockef***er use "The Bill of Rights" and "the U.N." in the same letter!!

24 posted on 06/05/2002 2:17:20 PM PDT by RFP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RFP
Good for you. Where had you heard about this when you wrote him.?

We really need to ambush Powell.

32 posted on 06/05/2002 2:44:51 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson