Posted on 04/17/2002 3:08:39 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
--At Large Would that the gentlewoman from Georgia were merely a flake. But she does real damage. Ask the victims of Robert Mugabe.--
To be sure, Cynthia McKinney, the gentlewoman from Georgia's Fourth Congressional District, is a flake, but what kind of a flake -- merely absurd, or knowingly pernicious? Whether she is the one or the other, however, attention must be paid. She made the Prowler's Enemies List last week, but only in passing, and her aberrant behavior demands a longer look than that.
Most recently, McKinney, in an interview with a Berkeley, California radio station, said that President Bush had advance warning of the terrorist attacks on September 11, but did nothing to prevent them. "Persons close to this administration," she added, "are poised to make huge profits off America's new war." In particular, she cited the Carlyle Group, an investment firm that employs a number of one-time government officials -- former President George H. W. Bush is a consultant -- as a beneficiary of the new war.
According to the Washington Post, which first disclosed the Berkeley radio interview, McKinney said the war had enriched Carlyle Group investors by increasing the value of a military contractor that the firm partly owned. When the Post asked her for a follow-up interview, however, McKinney declined, and issued instead a statement:
"I am not aware of any evidence showing that President Bush or members of his administration have personally profited from the attacks of 9-11. A complete investigation might reveal that to be the case."
Consider that as actively pernicious, an attempt to raise paranoid discontent. Meanwhile in a House speech last month, McKinney made virtually the same assertions as she did in the radio interview, although this time she sounded merely absurd, or, perhaps, patently nuts.
McKinney asked her colleagues to close their eyes and "imagine themselves going faster and faster into a black unknown." Then, she said, they will see a "bright light," and hear "a huge booming voice coming from nowhere, and at the same time coming from everywhere."
Just what the voice was saying, however, McKinney did not say, but instead went on:
"You unlock this door with the key of understanding. Beyond it is another dimension, a dimension of hearing that which is not spoken, a dimension of seeing that which is invisible, a dimension of reading that which is not written."
And this, she declared, is "the Twilight Zone, better known as George Bush's America."
Then she said the White House had received "warning after warning" about the terrorist attacks, but had begged Senate majority leader Tom Daschle not to inquire why it had done nothing about them. She also said that Bush was calling for a big increase in defense spending, and that this means "his dad stands to make a mint."
"Wake up, America," she concluded. "We are not only in the Twilight Zone. We have crossed the threshold to George Bush's America."
Grant now that the right wing also has its clowns and bozos. On the "700 Club" the other night, Pat Robertson warned us about that dread secret order, the Masons. Nonetheless you always know what side the right wingers are on, while you can never be sure with left wingers like McKinney. She often suggests that America is run by hooded men in white sheets, and that it wants to oppress people of color everywhere. At the U.N.'s fatuous conference in South Africa last year on racism, sexism, colonialism and God knows what else, she said the White House was full of "latent racists."
(When Kofi Annan, the U.N. secretary general, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize a few months after she attended the U.N. conference, however, McKinney, ever the loose cannon, denounced the award as "an insult to the millions that died at the hand of the U.N. in recent years.")
McKinney often poses as a great friend of Africa and an expert on its problems. As a member of the House International Relations Committee and the Congressional Black Caucus, she frequently makes pronouncements. She has, however, a sorry record on Africa, and she does more harm than good. She plays the race card, and mindlessly supports tyrants.
McKinney, for example, has defended Robert Mugabe's despotic rule in Zimbabwe. In a bizarre House speech last December, she said that Zimbabwe was a "stable democracy." She also said that Mugabe, who has impoverished his country and brought about a famine, brutalized his opponents, and ordered the killing of any number of ordinary Zimbabweans, has only been attempting to right old wrongs. The old wrongs, of course, were all imposed by white colonialists; and any attempt by Congress to censure Mugabe or impose sanctions on Zimbabwe, according to McKinney, would be a "formal declaration of United States complicity to maintain white-skin rule."
This was, in fact, a grotesque analysis, but you would be wrong to dismiss it or others like it. So know now that some of Mugabe's domestic political opponents were here last week, trying to drum up support for a democratic transition in Zimbabwe. They turned up at the State Department, Congress and the Council on Foreign Relations. They also met, unhappily, with what one of them called their "African-American brothers."
Most of the brothers, it seemed, did not want to take any kind of stand against Mugabe. According to the Zimbabweans, they had bought into the idea that he was a revolutionary leader and that any attempt to unseat him would play into the hands of his country's old white rulers. The Zimbabweans were disappointed, of course, but there you are. McKinney may deal in paranoid absurdities, but they are not without effect.
Meanwhile McKinney is patronized by her congressional colleagues, at least some of whom, it seems, even admire her political acumen. The Washington Post story about her September 11 accusation also quoted Georgia Congressman Jack Kingston, a Republican no less, whom it identified as a friend of McKinney's.
Kingston said McKinney was adept at raising "red-meat" issues that appeal to her political base. "She's not as random as people think," he said. "People always want to hear a political conspiracy theory."
Indeed they do, and McKinney no doubt will continue to offer them. So yes, she is a flake, but above all, she is a menace.
John Corry is a former New York Times reporter and media critic. His column appears each Tuesday.
This was, in fact, a grotesque analysis, but you would be wrong to dismiss it or others like it. So know now that some of Mugabe's domestic political opponents were here last week, trying to drum up support for a democratic transition in Zimbabwe. They turned up at the State Department, Congress and the Council on Foreign Relations. They also met, unhappily, with what one of them called their "African-American brothers."
Most of the brothers, it seemed, did not want to take any kind of stand against Mugabe. According to the Zimbabweans, they had bought into the idea that he was a revolutionary leader and that any attempt to unseat him would play into the hands of his country's old white rulers. The Zimbabweans were disappointed, of course, but there you are. McKinney may deal in paranoid absurdities, but they are not without effect. ***
Zimbabwe -- State to ignore security rulings***Observers say it appears that the country's courts are becoming increasingly irrelevant as Mugabe moves in what is seen as a campaign to silence all his opponents. Mugabe has for years declared he would not listen to judges who ruled against his mass seizure of white-owned land, but observers say this is the first time that the regime has openly stated it would ignore the country's courts on any other issues.***
Cowardly whites who help Mugabe**** A less abashed co-operator is John Bredenkamp, a former member of the Rhodesian rugby team and husband to ex-Miss Rhodesia, who was revealed last Sunday to be the 33rd richest man in Britain with a £720 million fortune and a home in Berkshire. Mr Bredenkamp is thought to be close to Mugabe, but especially to Emmerson Mnangagwa, the speaker of the Zimbabwean parliament and Mugabe's heir-apparent. Mr Bredenkamp's mining operations in the Congo benefit greatly from the incursion of Zimbabwean troops, which is a kind of joint-stock venture by Zanu-PF and its business friends. Has Bredenkamp ever raised his voice in protest at anything done by his chums? On the contrary. He is going round offering to buy up some of the most beautiful white farms, on the understanding that he can get the acquisition orders lifted. Then one might mention another Zanu-PF crony, called Billy Rautenbach, who is wanted by Interpol. And then there are the really big players, the ones who should have had the guts to speak out, but who have kept silent. Prime among these is Anglo-American, the giant South African conglomerate, which is now supposed to have a good liberal conscience.****
How Did Mugabe Win Re-Election?-Terrorism, Torture and Overwhelming Vote Fraud***The man who knows the secrets of Mugabe's re-election is Tobaiwa Mudede, the Registrar-General, the outspokenly pro-Mugabe official who runs all Zimbabwe's elections. More than a month before the election Mudede told a meeting at the International School in Harare that he could imagine no circumstances in which he would declare anyone other than Mugabe the election winner. Pictures in the state-run Herald of how the results were announced are almost beyond parody. In the centre sits Obriel Mpofu, who announced the results on TV, flanked by Mudede and a series of other Mugabe loyalists, including the Police Commissioner, Augustine Chihuri, in full uniform. These are not only the men who know the secrets of the results but the men who, in large part, manufactured them. ***
Representative Ford, for example. He'll soon be followed by others from Chicago, New York, and Detroit. This is in the "AIDS Caused by White Men" school of thought, and it works very well on Cynthia's, and other bases.
Sullivan said Harare had to "recognise the absolute criticality of a free and fair elections to its continued legitimacy as a democracy within the international community". An election that accurately reflected the wishes of the Zimbabwean people "could set the stage for international assistance aimed at Zimbabwe's economic recovery, including resolution of the long-standing land issue", he said. "Conversely, failure to hold a free and fair election would have serious consequences for the international standing of Zimbabwe and its leaders."
Sullivan promised support for Zimbabwe's "dynamic civil society" and said he would lobby for the deployment of election observers from the start of campaigning. He would support the independent media "in every way possible".
Tipped to succeed Sullivan in Luanda is Christopher Dell, previously chief of the US mission in Pristina, Kosovo. He called US relations with the MPLA government "positive and no longer clouded by distrust". Angola was "increasingly important to our energy security", Dell said, noting it supplied 3,5% of US imports, and 7% from nations which, like itself, are not members of the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries.
Meanwhile, In Wellington, New Zealand, Phil Goff, the new foreign minister, said yesterday he had ticked off Zimbabwe's new diplomatic representative, Florence Chitauro, over the Mugabe regime's record on human rights. Goff told parliament:
"I raised the undermining of the independence of the judiciary and the press, the attacks on lawyers representing political parties or political representatives in court, threats against diplomatic missions and international aid agencies and continued intimidation and violence against those opposed to President Mugabe's regime." [End]
_________________________________________________________________
April 16, 2002 - New Zealand Government Imposes Ban On Travel To New Zealand By Zimbabwe Officials
Nicely summarized!
Flame away at me for saying this, but black Zimbabweans of my aquaintance are of the opinion that Black Americans are willful idiots.
The average black African villager knows more about the world than Black Americans know about "africa" which they consider to be one country.
It's pathetic.
An enemy at the gate is less formidable, For his is known and carries his banner openly.
But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, His/Her sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, Heard within the very halls of government itself.
For the traitor appears not a traitor: He speaks in accents familier to his victims, And wears their face, And their arguments.
He appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the sould of a nation.
He works secretly and Unknown in the night. To undermine the pillars of the city.
He infests the body politic, So that it can no longer resist.
A murderer is less to fear
Marcus Tullius Cicero 42 B.C.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.