lol anyone that thinks some affair with a donkey faces freak would have changed the outcome needs their head examined the access Hollywood tape was more harmful to trump than anything else and he still won.. this bogus trial is all about 2016 they still can’t stand the fact that trump won it will stick in their crawl for all eternity.. also I notice no mention of hunters laptop if that had not been suppressed what the outcome would have been
RICO Lawfare.
Then .. everything a candidate does is part of a “conspiracy to influence an election”.
If a candidate buys a new suit then he is part of a “conspiracy to influence an election” etc etc blah blah woof woof.
Unbelievable that they are able to argue that in court. But Trump is not allowed to argue that this whole case is about influencing the 2024 election. This whole thing is so unfair. obumber was right, I don’t recognize my country anymore.
Assistant District Attorney Matthew Colangelo’s opening statement sought to elevate the criminal charges against Trump as no mere white-collar misdeed, but something that had an impact on the direction of the country.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
more sensational alinsky sensational projection opening
What about the Clintons’ efforts to cover up Hillary’s messes?
The home-brew server, the classified documents, the health cover-up?
Why isn’t Hillary being prosecuted for preventing the American People from knowing the real truth in the 2016 election??
A stooge from the DOJ takes, what is essentially, a demotion to asst DA and gives the opening remarks at Trump’s show trial instead of giving that honor to his new boss DA Bragg.
Isn’t that special.
Influence which election?
Payments were made in 2017. AFTER 2016 before 2020. Choose
will this be the forum for bringing up what really influenced the election, ie mail in ballots?
hehehe
let’s hope.
ROFL!!!
That's ridiculous.
Would a juror be dismissed if he literally laughed out loud at that sort of stupidity from an attorney?
Does the prosecutor understand that, using Stormy Daniels and Avenati to damage Trump during the 2016 election, was an attempt by democrats to influence the outcome of that election?
The prosecutor and the whole hush-money trial is an attempt to influence the outcome of the 2024 election, therefore, that trial must be stopped immediately, or all involved in bringing the case to court should be brought up on charges of election tampering.
The Conspiracy is that Trump was running for office. Not everything is illegal. I wish prosecutor could be arrested for Perjury.
Wait, the fed lawyer gave the opening statement? What a scam.
The FEC has EXCLUSIVE authority to prosecute election crimes. There is no STANDING for a state to prosecute. As such, those charges should be dropped.
Without the federal “crimes” the state charges, by law drop to misdemeanor. Those charges were made after the statue of limitations ran out. By law, they should also be dropped.
This would leave the prosecution with .... nothing.
And, there it is!
This is the Hill-dog getting back at Trump any way she can for kicking her useless ass in 2016.
She’s behind every bit of this.
I guess I’m not sure when trying to influence an election became a criminal act. Everything politicians and the media do are intended to influence an election.
And when did trying to influence the outcome of an election become a crime?
Isn't this the purpose of every campaign speech, commercial, and TV appearance? Isn't this the primary activity and objective of every politician?