Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court extends block on Texas law that would allow police to arrest migrants
ABC News ^ | 3/18/24 | By LINDSAY WHITEHURST

Posted on 03/18/2024 3:25:19 PM PDT by CFW

The Supreme Court on Monday indefinitely extended its block on a Texas law that would give police broad powers to arrest migrants suspected of illegally entering the U.S. while the legal battle it sparked over immigration authority plays out

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court on Monday indefinitely extended its block on a Texas law that would give police broad powers to arrest migrants suspected of illegally entering the U.S. while the legal battle it sparked over immigration authority plays out.

The one-page order signed by Justice Samuel Alito did not set a deadline, instead extending the stay “pending further order.”

Opponents have called the law, known as Senate Bill 4, the most dramatic attempt by a state to police immigration since an Arizona law more than a decade ago, portions of which were struck down by the Supreme Court.

The Texas Attorney General has said the state’s law mirrored federal law and “was adopted to address the ongoing crisis at the southern border, which hurts Texans more than anyone else.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: aliens; border; illegalaliens; invasion; scotus; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: CFW

If Alito believes there’s a problem with the Texas law, then maybe there is actually a problem with it. He doesn’t usually go off half cocked, and he doesn’t seem to tolerate liberal nonsense.

The fact the Constitution specifically gives control of immigration to the President and Congress may be the issue, or Alito may believe there are other problems.


21 posted on 03/18/2024 3:52:25 PM PDT by Roadrunner383 (m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

They’re NOT migrants.

They’re criminal, illegal, alien invaders.


22 posted on 03/18/2024 3:53:50 PM PDT by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
It's easy to get your way when you intimidate the Supreme Court in front of the whole country.

.


23 posted on 03/18/2024 3:57:52 PM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

I would think that after years of apathy from the right while all of this was happening, they have little concern over anyone saying “game on”.


24 posted on 03/18/2024 4:00:19 PM PDT by TwelveOfTwenty (Will whoever keeps asking if this country can get any more insane please stop?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CFW

It didn’t say anything about just shooting them on sight, did it?


25 posted on 03/18/2024 4:05:46 PM PDT by TangoLimaSierra (⭐⭐To the Left, The Truth is Right Wing Violence⭐⭐)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Just be very strict on law-braking -shoplifting 1 year in jail-—crossing streets- vehicle codes- no id-etc-— go to sanctuary states. Free transportation.


26 posted on 03/18/2024 4:07:58 PM PDT by Mark (DONATE ONCE every 3 months-is that a big deal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; CFW
Yes, ignore the feds and SCROTUS.

Have the TNG and Texas State Guard face off against the feds.

Let's have a Constitutional crisis, right before the election and have Traitor Joe explain to the nation why Texas should not be allowed protect their sovereignty from an invasion force of tens of millions of illiterate, diseased savages, that hate the US.

Perhaps Pedo Joe will, then, explain how illegally admitting these Third World miscreants and putting them on welfare benefits the Republic.

27 posted on 03/18/2024 4:09:59 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Welcome to the Matrix . Orwell's "1984" was a warning, not an instruction manual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CFW
Signed by Judge Alito - a card carrying Conservative, as I recall.

At the very least, Alito should have reminded Americans that a President can be impeached and convicted if he does not "faithfully execute the laws."

28 posted on 03/18/2024 4:11:19 PM PDT by zeestephen (Trump "Lost" By 43,000 Votes - Spread Across Three States - GA, WI, AZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbrfl

This!!!
Let someone come enforce their ruling!


29 posted on 03/18/2024 4:11:31 PM PDT by bantam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Exactly. Joe Biden brags all the time about how he defied the SCOTUS on student loan forgiveness.


30 posted on 03/18/2024 4:14:09 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CFW

The Supreme Court destroyed the Constitution and is now firmly wedded to the Deep State and its destruction of what remains.


31 posted on 03/18/2024 4:21:35 PM PDT by Trumpisourlastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest

What if they were bused to DC?


32 posted on 03/18/2024 4:23:39 PM PDT by ActresponsiblyinVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SecondAmendment

The state is the one that are hurting their residents. When that happens, it’s time to start picking them off…

Open to interpretation 😉


33 posted on 03/18/2024 4:24:49 PM PDT by Maskot (Put every dem/lib in prison........like yesterday!!! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CFW

This is a federalist decision. It denies the states the ability to enforce federal law being ignored by the illegitimate POTUS. This is not anything a true conservative would do to the country.


34 posted on 03/18/2024 4:27:42 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

The three branches of our government need pruning.


35 posted on 03/18/2024 4:29:07 PM PDT by Recompennation (Don’t blame me my vote didn’t count)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldplayer; doc maverick

I never said otherwise.

What I do respect about SCOTUS rulings are they must be careful to not open doors that might infringe on our rights, for all of us. Just having a ‘suspicion’ isn’t enough - which is what I said. Of course, seeing somebody wade across the Rio Grande is beyond ‘suspicion’, the crime is witnessed by law enforcement. This isn’t what is being put into question though.

It all comes down to what is written exactly. If it is ‘somebody close to the border that speaks with an accent’, does that on its own rise to the level of ‘reasonable articulable suspicion’? I’d argue it doesn’t, which is what I’d think is the caution of the SCOTUS.

That said, we’re under an invasion - the military should be at the border. Giving police broad powers after the fact is dangerous but more severe government action should be stopping it in the first place.


36 posted on 03/18/2024 4:29:12 PM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Acceptable: Officers can smile, give them a foil wrapped Godiva chocolate, a fresh cut flower and a little booklet on tourist attractions nearby.

“And have a wonderful rest of your day.”


37 posted on 03/18/2024 4:30:35 PM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

THIS. IF China Jo can ignore SCOTUS on student debt....then so can Texas on something far more important.


38 posted on 03/18/2024 4:30:43 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CFW; All

I don;t even have to look... Leftists will be having a large Circle Jerk over this.


39 posted on 03/18/2024 4:34:19 PM PDT by Texan4Life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Is SCOTUS afraid to go against the deep state?
Maybe they are thinking about supreme court justice Scalia…..
Never know what kind of pressure influences their decisions.


40 posted on 03/18/2024 4:36:38 PM PDT by doc maverick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson