Posted on 02/16/2024 5:40:14 AM PST by CFW
Here is princess “DIE” in a short clip with her tips for women.
https://freebeacon.com/democrats/pro-tips-with-fani-willis/
Jason Whitlock
Fani Willis Embarrasses Black Women, Emasculates Men, Turns Courtroom into Beauty Shop | Ep 622
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnE9mLbDlug
> Kemp talking about Fani pre hearing.
Aug 31, 2023
Fani Willis’ Testimony in Trump Georgia Case: Behavior and Body Language
Dr. G explains
2/17/2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgGQr6id_YY
this guy despite his bona fides seems intent on portraying willis as being truthful. however, read the following comment from a viewer:
“Narcissists and pathological liars lie with confidence. They convince themselves that it doesn’t matter if something is actually true if they think “you can’t prove I am lying”. If you don’t think lying is wrong you won’t be nervous about it. I’m not saying she is those things, just that these indicators only work if the person is ashamed or afraid of getting caught.”
Agree.
Agree
Great point
‘We’ve opened up a whole area’: Judge, lawyers stunned as Trump RICO special prosecutor attacks witness who was helping them all day, opening door for new revelations
COLIN KALMBACHER
Law and Crime
Feb 16th, 2024, 6:15 pm
from a comment:
“Fulton County code (Willis & Wade are such) has policies regarding the hiring of relatives (which includes romantic partners), requiring disclosure and approval (precisely to avoid conflict of interest).
“...it is the responsibility of the applicant to fully disclose the relationship to the Appointing Authority before the offer of employment is accepted. The intentional failure to disclose a relative relationship constitutes a violation of this Policy and may be grounds for rescission of the offer of employment, non-selection and/or discipline, up to and including termination.””
why fani willis is not disqualified under georgia law
richard painter, et al
jan. 21, 2024
just security
https://www.justsecurity.org/91368/why-fani-willis-is-not-disqualified-under-georgia-law/
(note: recommends wade voluntarily step aside)
step aside, fani willis
richard painter
the atlantic (paywall)
fe. 18, 2024
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/02/fani-willis-fultun-trump/677506/
Fani Willis Hearing Could Be Upended by Nathan Wade Texts
Published Feb 19, 2024 at 7:19 AM EST
Updated Feb 19, 2024 at 8:35 AM EST
Newsweek
https://www.newsweek.com/fani-willis-georgia-hearing-nathan-wade-texts-1871102
The Georgia case against Trump may be fatally compromised
BY ANDREW FLEISCHMAN, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR
02/20/24 12:00 PM ET
The Hill
Fani Willis Faces Double Whammy in Fight to Keep her Job
Natalie Venegas
Newsweek
Published Feb 21, 2024 at 4:04 PM EST
Updated Feb 21, 2024 at 5:04 PM EST
https://www.newsweek.com/fani-willis-faces-double-whammy-fight-keep-her-job-1872196
the state tried to attack bradley as a witness by attempting to call ana rodriguez and the man bun guy. judge mcafee disallowed most testimony under the premise that it fell under an exemption described in “Rule 608(b).” I wanted to try to find out where this rule is described and why it applies.
Using a web search, I found something called the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE for short). Under FRE, I found a Rule 608 as follows:
Rule 608. A Witness’s Character for Truthfulness or Untruthfulness
(a) Reputation or Opinion Evidence. A witness’s credibility may be attacked or supported by
testimony about the witness’s reputation for having a character for truthfulness or
untruthfulness, or by testimony in the form of an opinion about that character. But evidence
of truthful character is admissible only after the witness’s character for truthfulness has
been attacked.
(b) Specific Instances of Conduct. Except for a criminal conviction under Rule 609, extrinsic
evidence is not admissible to prove specific instances of a witness’s conduct in order to
attack or support the witness’s character for truthfulness. But the court may, on crossexamination, allow them to be inquired into if they are probative of the character for
truthfulness or untruthfulness of:
(1) the witness; or
(2) another witness whose character the witness being cross-examined has testified about.
By testifying on another matter, a witness does not waive any privilege against selfincrimination for testimony that relates only to the witness’s character for truthfulness
I can understand the concern about limiting the number of secondary issues in a hearing to a minimum for time reasons, and that this Rule 608(b) might be used to disqualify the testimony of witness Rodgriguez in the alleged state attempt to impeach state witness Bradley.
However, what I am wondering is whether this Rule 608(b) (if I have found the correct Rule 608(b)) could be used to deny entry of the cellhawk cell phone tower analysis affidavit provided by Mittelstadt. Does the affidavit fall into a different category of evidence than extrinsic evidence as used in Rule 608(b)? My legalese is rudimentary.
Guy is lying.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.