BREAKING: Judge Issues 'Gag Order' for Trump in Classified Documents Case Despite Presidential Campaign

Kyle Becker on Twitter ^ | June 19, 2023 | Kyle Becker

[Tzimisce]

Yeah - they’re fixing the next election.

[OldGoatCPO]

The question becomes was the subpoena valid under the PRA and under the rules on classification of documents. A judge can sign off on a subpoena and not be inside the law. Turly seems to feel the obstruction charges are the more dangerous so we will see. But I see a lot of appeals and right now all we have is the corrupt DOJ side of things. Even Turly mentioned for any of this to be valid there has to be an under lying criminal act. They know they will lose on the classification it is a red herring for people who have never worked with classified material. The Espionage Act is a stretch. But even for obstruction they have to prove none of those records are covered by the PRA. I am not an attorney so I default to what people like Turly are saying.

[frnewsjunkie]

They are ALL out to keep Trump from the Presidency so they can keep their corrupt, criminal, treasonous deep state running this country.
They are a happy bunch tonight. They can tell a judge how to rule. They can sell the country..they can rake in millions from other countries.. they can be bought.
Hey.
No worries.. we are the privileged protected

[frnewsjunkie]

You speak my language

[frnewsjunkie]

Fed up.,Trump has been attacked from all. Sides and too long,

Let him talk!!!

[miliantnutcase]

Guess what? Still voting for Trump!

[trustverify0128]

The time to challenge the legality of a subpoena is before

1) surrendering SOME documents

2) certifying that you’ve done the search and complied w/ the subpoena

I agree that the obstruction charge is the most compelling thing PDJT is facing. Depending on what evidence the DoJ has to back up their accusations in the indictment (and whether or not that evidence will be a) admissible in court and b) convincing to a jury) the obstruction charge could be the whole ball game.

[OldGoatCPO]

My understanding is they did surrender documents per requests by National Archives. They had a secure location approved for storage of the rest. The Trump lawyers were caught off guard by the search because they were still negotiating with the National Archives. If I recall correctly they even complied with a request to put a better lock on the storage facility.

The hope is Trump’s lawyers are up for this. The best thing is to appeal, appeal, delay. After election, this whole thing becomes mute win or lose.