To: Sir_Humphrey
Once again, it is not Fox that is defending against this action - it is the insurance carriers. Just the same as your automobile insurance carrier defending you in a fender bender. The carrier(s) reserves the right to use its discretion in bringing the matter to a conclusion within the coverage limits. If the settlement is greater than the coverage limits, then it falls to the insured to weigh in ...
103 posted on
04/18/2023 3:02:44 PM PDT by
CreviceTool
(A Good Samaritan with a handgun saved my life...)
To: CreviceTool
You may be right but I always thought the Dominion angle was bogus. Don’t get me wrong, the fix was in, but not because of Dominion.
105 posted on
04/18/2023 3:05:54 PM PDT by
Sir_Humphrey
(The “only Trumpers” are just as damaging to the conservative cause as are the “never Trumpers”)
To: CreviceTool
Once again, it is not Fox that is defending against this action - it is the insurance carriers. Just the same as your automobile insurance carrier defending you in a fender bender. The carrier(s) reserves the right to use its discretion in bringing the matter to a conclusion within the coverage limits. If the settlement is greater than the coverage limits, then it falls to the insured to weigh in ...So, wouldn't FOX have attorneys working with the insurance company ones right along?
Say, FOX had a 1/2 billion policy, so would be willing to part with 387 million to settle.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson