Why couldn’t they just stay in the closet in the US, when most people knew who was gay, but they just called themselves “roommates” and it was don’t ask, don’t tell.
I am not as extreme as a number of people here on the subject...but I AM NOT BLIND.
It was NEVER gonna stop at “recognition” and then “domestic partnership” etc. etc.
It was always going to lead where it has led to and should have been stopped early on.
I don’t believe in the death penalty for being gay.
Grooming..that’s a WHOLE DIFFERENT STORY and I believe in a monster prison sentence for that...and there are many ways to groom.
Rape is a death penalty to me for ANY kinds of rape.
Like I said, why couldn’t they just stay the #@#@ in the closet? Now with the sick things they have forced upon our children, they leave us no choice but to fight back.
Oh well
The predatory activism against children far exceeds the homo demo — a systemic evil
Regarding the closet, I no longer GAF about the consequence detailed in the article. The Left eviscerated whatever tolerance/sympathy I once cared to realize.
Yup. Obviously there are some sins that haven’t typically been criminalized, because to enforce them causes more problems. Breaking down doors to investigate “roommates” for suspected sodomitical acts sounds too Big Brother to me.
But we are a couple of Sodom and Gomorrah’s beyond that now, and I think most sensible people are realizing that this **** has gone too far.
Personally, I think gays can’t stay in the closet because flaunting themselves IS their fetish. Normal married people draw a modest curtain around this part of their lives.
“...being Gay...”
No such thing.
Sodomy is the first stop on that controversial line, though (grooming being a later stop). Outlaw (or re-outlaw) sodomy, and hold the line while a certain fraction of the population objects vociferously, and begin prosecuting flagrant cases. See where and what that gets you and consider next steps in terms of additional laws. But don’t recognize an identity associated with the act.