Posted on 03/01/2023 4:34:32 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
A new Stanford study found that even if we reach net zero emissions by 2100, global warming is on track to eclipse critical preventative goals set by the United Nations in the Paris Climate Agreement of 2015.
Researchers used artificial neural networks to predict the time until critical global warming thresholds are reached. The model projected that global warming would reach 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels between 2033 and 2035.
The AI model uses historical temperature data and climate simulations as inputs. This unique approach allows the machine learning model to make more accurate predictions beyond the scope of historical data, according to Noah Diffenbaugh, the study’s lead author and Stanford professor of earth systems. Further, they say the AI could separate signal from noise and directly incorporate uncertainties into the prediction.
“The main message from the AI prediction [is] that the world’s on the cusp of reaching 1.5 degrees of warming,” said Diffenbaugh. “The AI predicts a high probability [of reaching 1.5 degrees] in the next 10 to 15 years, even if emissions are reduced in that time period.”
(Excerpt) Read more at stanforddaily.com ...
Ooh, this model’s so much better. It’s got AI!
It's all about money. How much did they get for this research.
Garbage in, garbage out. Keep those multi million dollars grants coming! “We promise you you will like the results of our studies”
A stack of previous guesses are used as inputs.
Let’s see that “unique” thing predict who wins the Kentucky Derby:
- Climate Change
- Global Warming
- Battery Charger
- Rising Tide
Shut uup!
Moron’s full of self pride and arrogance.
Co2 was 4 times higher in the past and life is still here on earth, 1.5 degrees will make even more regions available for agriculture improving life for all.
The earth swings have both been hotter and colder before man was on the earth, according to these same scientists, but now we are to believe this is a problem. They are not scientists, they are snake oil salesmen only in their case they would murder millions for their fraud.
You’ve got to hand it to ‘em. This is the most successful hoax in the history of hoaxes.
Models. Pfft! My model says if you boil water hot enough and long enough it turns into ice.
I thought Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said we only has 12 years left and that was about 5 years ago. Now I find out we’ve got until 2100. Party’s on dude!!!
If there was anything to this the billionaires would be all selling their beachfront properties
That’s not what the solar cycle model says, which, at 93% accuracy, is far more accurate than any GIGO computer model.
Would this be similar/related to the AI model that said it would kill all human life on the planet to stop globull warming?
Name one 1,000 year period in Earth’s history where the climate was static.
It is noteworthy to me that almost(?) all of our prestigious educational institutions have become corrupted by the government and corporate money supporting the scientifically dead global-warming/climate-change theory. It is a classic example of zombie science; a scientifically dead theory kept alive only by financial support.
The neural networks that came up with this result were trained by “climate researchers” who, for the last 30 years at least, didn’t get a grant unless they kept to the politically correct line for their Lysenko “science”.
GIGO
So long as the operate on the premise that CO2 causes global warming, they’ll be going down this rabbit hole. A faulty premise produces faulty conclusions.
I don't see it as a series of independent hoaxes over the years, in that there is a bigger hoax, a 'Mother' of hoaxes, to which all the regular hoaxes play a part.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.