Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shasta County Clerk to hold webinar addressing claims of election fraud
Krcr ^ | 10/ 3 /2022 | Miranda Angel

Posted on 10/04/2022 5:19:39 AM PDT by cuz1961

REDDING, Calif. — Shasta County's Clerk and Registrar of Voters is hosting a moderated discussion on Monday evening to address claims of election fraud during a recent Board of Supervisors meeting.

/ It'll include a moderated discussion with the following:

Justin Grimmer, a Professor of Political Science and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. .

Cathy Darling Allen, Shasta County Clerk. .

Ryan Ronco, president of the California Association of Clerks and Elections Officials and Placer County Registrar. .

Jeannette Logue, retired from the California Teachers Association and long time poll worker. .

Grimmer will share with the audience his concerns about the use of “statistical analysis” of election data and how to.... evaluate misleading claims .....such as those made at Shasta County board meetings, according to the elections office.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: elections
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
evaluate misleading claims .

/\

No pre judgement there,,. no not at all.

A Stanford academic and a teachers union poll worker, I'm so comforted.

And notice it's online,,, The better to censor with.

Why have one at all.?

To honey trap for the doj and fib ?

1 posted on 10/04/2022 5:19:39 AM PDT by cuz1961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

The free webinar will start at 5:30 p.m. and goes until 7 p.m.

RELATED CONTENT | Shasta County Supervisors address voting controversy, hear public’s opinion
https://krcrtv.com/news/local/shasta-county-supervisors-address-voting-controversy-hear-publics-opinion

Grimmer will share with the audience his concerns about the use of “statistical analysis” of election data and how to evaluate misleading claims such as those made at Shasta County board meetings, according to the elections office.

Click here for the link to register.


2 posted on 10/04/2022 5:23:38 AM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

I went to link to rigister, but it wanted me to.download.some app.

No thanks.


3 posted on 10/04/2022 5:24:57 AM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961
Loser liberal pukes disputing the votes of the people, except when they win.

An all-too-common habit completely ignored.

4 posted on 10/04/2022 5:29:55 AM PDT by chief lee runamok (My Pronoun: N/A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

Ahh.

No wonder The sudden push for evaluating ...

One election team already challenged over 30,000 possible “phantoms”! Now they can do it with tax records. No appeal there!

We are loading all 3,200 counties’ property tax records — public files — and comparing them with the voter registration records in every county. With snapshots, think trillions of records here.

This is Project Omega.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/10/where_artificial_intelligence_can_expose_leftist_vote_fraud.html


5 posted on 10/04/2022 5:32:54 AM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok

Justin Grimmer, a Professor of Political Science and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University.
This gives me pause. The Hoover is not known to harbor radico-illogical thinkers. This seems a logical inquiry.


6 posted on 10/04/2022 5:38:48 AM PDT by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bookshelf

This gives me pause. The Hoover is not known to harbor radico-illogical thinkers.
/\

Says you.

/

This seems a logical inquiry.

/\
Inquiry ?
What inquiry ?
Did you miss the stated purpose of the whole production ?

Let me tefresh you.

\/
the use of “statistical analysis” of election data and how to.... evaluate........ misleading .....claims.
\/

There is no freaking inquiring,
they already made up their minds.

MISLEADING CLAIMS

And why yes I did shout cuz you seem to be dull of senses.

Your welcome.


7 posted on 10/04/2022 5:49:48 AM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

Bookshelf ?

Are you a librarian ?
A teacher ?
An election official ?
A shasta resident?

DOJ or FBI.?

Just wondering.


8 posted on 10/04/2022 5:51:22 AM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

Are you from that area?


9 posted on 10/04/2022 6:04:32 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Slava Ukraini!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

10/4/2022, 6:04:32 AM · 9 of 9
ScottinVA to cuz1961
Are you from that area?

/\

Yes.

20 years in shasta county , I’m a native Californian.

.


10 posted on 10/04/2022 6:12:50 AM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

Good deal.. I lived in Red Bluff from ‘72-’76.


11 posted on 10/04/2022 6:17:34 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Slava Ukraini!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

Pillow-Guy’s Election-Denying, Redding-Welcomed BFF Refuted by Stanford Professor: ‘So much chaos’

https://anewscafe.com/2022/09/28/redding/pillow-guys-election-denying-redding-welcomed-bff-refuted-by-stanford-professor-so-much-chaos/

Some may call it a coincidence that in the middle of the Sept. 13 Shasta County Board of Supervisors public comment period — precisely as the meeting was being blatantly hijacked by election-denier Dr. Douglas Frank, abetted by Supervisor Patrick Jones — that Supervisor Mary Rickert would Google Frank, and find

Professor Justin Grimmer’s ......scathing critiques.... about the bow-tied professor.

..Finally, when the serial rule-of-law-breaking Supervisor Patrick Jones briefly inhaled between feeding Frank leading questions, Rickert jumped in to quote Grimmer and his findings that basically blew Frank’s...... election-denying ....theories out of the water.....
.

/\
Justin Grimmer

Yup.
Full blown Stanford prog.

Let’s see what other gems justin has for us from this link..

\/

DC: Professor Grimmer, thank you for taking the time to answer some questions about Douglas Frank, who spoke in Redding recently before an audience of passionate election-deniers, many of whom have monopolized public comment periods for many months with claims of voter fraud and stolen elections. Can you begin with a bit of background about how Douglas Frank got on your radar, and what prompted you to investigate his claims?

JG: After the 2020 election and before Biden’s inauguration I began working on evaluating voter fraud claims.

That work resulted in a paper where we show that these claims are based on faulty statistical reasoning. In part because of this paper a reporter from the Philadelphia Inquirer contacted me in the Summer of 2021 and he asked my research group to evaluate Frank’s claims. That resulted in an article, and subsequently I have discussed Frank’s claims in a CNN story that I believe Supervisor Rickert quoted in the meeting.

I have kept track of his claims, particularly as he has been moving through California. Most recently, I attended a meeting between Frank and Placer County election officials

\/
Looks to be the Premier fraud denier and CNN darling go to.


12 posted on 10/04/2022 6:27:45 AM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

Half a dozen leftists discussing how conservatives are racist conspiracy theorist, white extremist ‘election deniers’.


13 posted on 10/04/2022 6:40:15 AM PDT by Pollard (Worm & GMO Free - some call us purebloods)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bookshelf

The Hoover is not known to harbor radico-illogical thinkers.

/\

But CNN absolutely does.

No ?


14 posted on 10/04/2022 6:45:09 AM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

Obama 2008 Vote Fraud tool

A look at Shasta County:

2008    obama           mclame          oaters [others]  total
Shasta	36%	28,867	62%	49,588	2%	1,734    80,189
2020    biden           Trump           oaters [others]  total        
Shasta	32%	30,000	65%	60,789	        2,141    92,930

2016    clinton         Trump           oaters [others]  total
Shasta	28%   22,301	65%	51,778	        5,974    80,053

expanded with 3rd parties

2008    obama           mclame          oaters [others]                                                                                 total
Shasta	36%	28,867	62%	49,588	2%	1,734                                                                                   80,189
2020    biden           Trump           oaters [others] jojo            howie           rocky           gloria          write-in        total        
Shasta	32%	30,000	65%	60,789	        2,141   1.37%	1,277	0.40%	368	0.30%	281	0.20%	185	0.04%	30	92,930

2016    clinton         Trump           oaters [others] johnson         stein           sanders         gloria                          total
Shasta	28%   22,301	65%	51,778	        5,974   4.2%	3,382	1.6%	1,300	520	329	439	                	80,053

about 29/30th in population out of 58 California counties.

In 2020, the national DNC vote fraud machine used an IT "brute force" method to pump up the vote counts in most states.

They just went down the list of counties and worked on the most populous ones.

Shasta is around 30th in California, so there probably was tampering - and it also looks like it, with Basement Joe getting more votes than Obama, after cratering in 2016 with the Hildabeast.

You can see that Trump made the sale with the Libertarians from 2016 to 2020, and also with other 3rd party people.

With the Obama 2008 Vote Fraud tool, if you examine the counties smaller than Shasta, you'll see where Obama 2008 starts beating Biden 2020. There will be a pretty bright line where they decided that the county was too small to mess with.

Grimmer will share with the audience his concerns about the use of “statistical analysis” of election data

This is one of Grimmer's "naughty statistical analysis” methods. :)

15 posted on 10/04/2022 7:13:00 AM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bookshelf

Maybe Justine could also apply his expertise to this event.

Bombshell Dominion ‘Error Code’ Uncovered in 97% of Georgia Counties

https://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/4098116/posts?page=1

https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/bombshell-dominion-error-code-uncovered?utm_source=email

Open records requests reveal 64 of 66 Georgia counties have the same unsolved ‘Tennessee Error’ that caused seven scanners to miscount hundreds of ballots in Williamson County.

In a podcast episode released last week Thursday, David Cross and Kevin Moncla of the Election Oversight Group reveal that open records request from 64 of 66 Georgia counties show the same security error “QR code signature mismatch” and warning message “Ballot format or id is unrecognizable” that caused seven scanners to miscount hundreds of ballots in Williamson County, Tennessee.

The “Tennessee Error” is an “anomaly” discovered on Dominion’s Image Cast Precinct (ICP) Tabulators (also referred to as “scanners”) that occurred during a Williamson County election held on October 26, 2021.

The Election Assistance Commission (EAC) defines an anomaly as “an irregular or inconsistent action or response from the voting system or the system component, which resulted in the system or component not functioning as intended or expected.”

In Williamson County, an election worker tallying votes on a post-it note realized that hundreds of ballots removed from a tabulator did not get counted.

Even though that tabulator never signaled that a problem occurred.

.


16 posted on 10/04/2022 8:03:52 AM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

“to address claims of election fraud...”

Unless there is a professional, open and public audit of the election, then you’re not actually addressing the claims.


17 posted on 10/04/2022 8:46:20 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

You have made up your mind. I will wait for the evidence.


18 posted on 10/04/2022 9:38:26 AM PDT by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bookshelf

You have made up your mind. I will wait for the evidence.

/\
Oh please.

Spare me the spin

Your ilk refuses to even look at the evidence.

Your ilk fools no one.

You wouldn’t even answer 1 of my questions, so your honesty eludes me.

You could have said no to all of them, so the “ evidence” says you are 1 if not all .

See how that works ?


19 posted on 10/04/2022 9:44:20 AM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

In twenty to twenty-five years on FR you are the biggest a-hole I have encountered.


20 posted on 10/04/2022 3:10:43 PM PDT by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson