I love this girl.
He DID have more than ten thousand legions of Angels at his disposal but voluntarily chose the path of suffering and sacrifice.
She continued: “Well, he didn’t have enough to keep his government from killing him.”
——————————————————————————
That was not really helpful or necessary. Unforced ever.
😞😞😞
There’s that GED education...
All I know is that the dude who drew his sword in the Garden of Gethsemane would deny Jesus Christ three times, but he was still the Rock upon which Christ built His church to prevail against Satan until the end of time.
I like Boebert, but that comment was totally out of line. She needs to issue an apology.
In America, everyone is a religious expert.
“The Christian New Testament teaches that Jesus willingly died on a cross to take the penalty for the sins of those who follow him and that he dissuaded his followers from using violence to try to save him, including one instance in which Jesus rebuked a disciple for cutting off the ear of a soldier who arrested him.”
The Hill, experts on the bible and Christianity. /S (hack, spit)
[[“Cain canceled Abel,” she said. “And guess what, it wasn’t with a big, scary AR-15, it was with a rock, so I don’t think it’s a firearm issue. I think it’s a heart, a sin issue.”]]
Not only that, but God blamed Cain for the murder, NOT the rock
It was joke. There is little doubt that knows that Jesus laid down his life willingly. I’m sure God understood it ws a joke. The left have a chronic lack of humor, which exp,ains their perpetual anger and outrage and hatred
There are many good arguments in support of the 2A. But Boebert‘s comment there isn’t one of them. It’s clumsy, and disrespectful.
On the other hand, there is something to be learned from Luke 22:36 - the original, not someone’s modification of it.
He said to them, “But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.”
Really just a couple of flaming swords would have done the job.
His disciples did have two assault weapons though (swords), open carry.
Article is wrong— it was NOT an “AR-15”... it was a Davison, and they don’t say how the looney punk kid got it on is birthday and passing a full federal background check— from an FFL.
Boebert is correct— but don’t confuse people who want ZERO personal responsibility for actions by changing the weapon of the time.
It is not a Bill of Needs, 2nd Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights which would have to be repealed Constitutionally not by some Senate pussies who are NOT up for re-election. Cornyn chosen because he is a TOOL.
I’ll take Boebert over anyone in the swamp any day.
That’s because I had good parents (mother and father), went to real schools where I got a real education - not indoctrination. And thankfully, I never spent much time in D.C. the town of clowns, drug users, and presidents that shower with their daughter.
Shove it, “the Hill”.
Unfortunately turning the other cheek only invites more violence and oppression from the marxist progressive wing in control of the democRAT party.
That was her original reply to a troll. I thought it was a good comeback but she should have left it at that instead of making it a campaign tour joke.
No, but they had “enough” swords on hand to fulfill God’s purpose.
Leave stuff like this up to the comedians.