Posted on 04/16/2022 6:27:01 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Pfizer announced this week that they were asking the FDA to issue an emergency use authorization (EUA) for a “booster” COVID-19 vaccine for children between the ages of 5 and 11. (Source.)
The FDA issued an EUA for the first Pfizer COVID-19 shots for this age group of children in October of 2021. (Source.)
At the time, a doctor on the FDA Advisory Committee deliberating on whether or not an EUA should be given for this age group, stated that the only way to find out if the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines were safe for this age group was to start injecting them with it.
“We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it, and that’s just the way it goes.”
So now that we have almost 6 months of data since the first EUA was issued for this age group to be injected with Pfizer’s COVID-19 shots, just how safe is it?
So far over 10,000 cases have been filed to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) of deaths and injuries among children in this age group following the experimental COVID-19 vaccines. (Source.)
By way of contrast, there have been 939 cases of vaccine adverse events during this same time period for all of the FDA approved vaccines for children in this age group. (Source.)
That means there has been an increase of over 1000% of vaccine injuries and deaths for this age group following the COVID-19 vaccines.
I could not find any data on how many children in this age group have been injected with the Pfizer COVID-19 shots, but news reports have stated that it is a small percentage of those eligible.
(Excerpt) Read more at healthimpactnews.com ...
If you weren’t unctuous, I wouldn’t recognize you.
Please remember you are pretending to be a doctor. Recall that in the 15 months or so of constant reports, even from FReepers on FR, you’ve never found ANY report of Covid ‘vaccine’ design, testing or harm worth ANY consideration. No report of seizures and deaths of children, heart attacks in 10 year olds ever caused you to even pause to wonder if...oh...I don’t know....the overwhelming number of reports for adults from a variety of sources might...gosh...imply some iota of concern for children who never needed the fake vaccine int he first place.
It’s your complete incapacity to even fake concern about the lives at risk. The unctious posturing as if you belong on the ‘higher ground’ above peasants who grieve when their grade schooler goes to bed with headache and doesn’t wake up after being ‘vaxxed.’
According to you, there is no valid source of data of concern on the planet. Doctors - you say they are biased, the CDC’s posts to it’s VAERS database, you say they mean nothing, ah....but the man who carried the CDC data to the reader for their chance to peruse and decide for themselves, he concerns you greatly.
You reliably distract from every effort to safeguard children, always ready with the tsk, tsk, tsk.
You disagree with me and anyone else who departs from the narrative. I can’t respect that.
Thank you for always being here to protect us from our own stupidity.
>> It is not unreasonable to point to the sources and see what they actually are.
It’s not unreasonable to question the sources. But when the questionable source posts factual information, that information shouldn’t be considered irrelevant.
Are you against vaccinating children with the Covid vaccine? What age do you think is appropriate to start receiving the Covid vaxx?
Great questions.
>> This site was once a place to debate facts, to provide evidence of claims. Now any blog or YouTube video, regardless of how suspect, reins supreme.
To the contrary, this thread is an example of challenging/debating the article’s claims.
Bravo!
And Ditto.
Your statements of fact that are untrue severely limits your credibility. If you are willing to make assertions of fat in which you either cannot be sure or have no knowledge, every argument you make then becomes suspect.
You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not the arbiter of the facts. I am unconcerned with whatever you or anyone else wishes to believe. I am concerned that you are unable to actually discern what the truth is and present your opinions as facts.
As another poster has pointed out — there is little discernment as to what really is in the voluminous cacophony of opinion presents as fact.
I wish you a good evening and a blessed easter. As my pastor pointed out on Good Friday — the passion and death of Christ was for the atonement of each of us, and to serve that will of the Father that we should be one in faith. Attack me all you want, I have said nothing untrue.
I had 2 people very close to me pass away from the vax, both very healthy and active in their early 60’s both passed within a week after second shot!! They would have to tie me down and knock me out to get this shot into my arm!! One of the people were a lifetime friend from high school a friend of 50 years devastating for me!! He was dead set against the vax HOWEVER his MIL was coming to visit and he wanted to protect her, WELL he died so she couldn’t get more protection than that!! Two days after second vax he became very jaundice went to SEVERAL docs, his liver had completely stopped working he passed in two weeks there was nothing they could do for him!! The second was a neighbor very healthy, very active, early 60’s, after second shot came home was feeling awful, went to bed, his wife woke up next to his deceased body, the wife paid for an autopsy because they deemed it natural causes, he had a blood clot to the brain and lung in his sleep!!
I aim absolutely agains vaccinating children against covid. The data demonstrate there is absolutely no risk for the pediatric population. And unlike the gross and rather unsophisticated attack by another on this thread directed at me without the courage to say it to my face, I have children and chose to not vaccinate them as the risks were greater than the benefits.
I think it is appropriate to receive the COVID vaccination if you have risk factors — age is a minor risk factor. Diabetics, obese, and pulmonary comorbities would suggest that the benefits outweigh the risks. Thus, as with everything in medicine, therapy and vaccination should be targeted and considered based on the individual. I have never stated there should me a mandated vaccine for anyone, and I have consistently argued against vaccination of the pediatric population.
I also think that with the advent of monoclonals and oral antivirals, there is an excellent case to be made that if someone objects to vaccination there are acceptable treatments that mitigate the disease instead of vaccination. But it is important to discern what actually works (monoclonals, and targeted oral antivirals) not repurposed drugs that have equivocal results (HCQ/ ivermectin).
Even once of the most quoted groups FLCCC recommends vaccination as a valid strategy and part of the pandemic management.
The point is that the question is what does the data show. Once we look at the data independent of emotion, we can discern what the best recommendation is. In this case, I would not recommend vaccinating children.
Thank you for your question. I hope it clarifies my position.
Yeah, yeah, I know. The VAERS data isn’t valid because nobody checks it.
If you were an ethical promoter of a vaccine, wouldn’t you actively collect adverse reaction information instead of actively not collecting it and deliberately obliterating any scientifically valid control group by vaccinating them, too?
Well?
TYPO notwithstanding:
I AM ABSOLUTELY AGAINST vaccinating children is how that should have read. Please forgive my typing skills. Perhaps I should not have spilled Diet Coke on my keyboard a month ago.
It turns out they did collect and report on adverse events following vaccination. Those results have been posted here over and over and over again.
There have been a lot of posts here on the vaccines. Try the search function.
As to vaccinating the people who got the placebo, when the results were as positive as they saw in the trials it would have been unethical to not un-blind the study and offer everyone the vaccines.
gas_dr to ransomnote
Your statements of fact that are untrue severely limits your credibility.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Stopped reading at that point. You have no credibility and you’re here to tell me I have no credibility. *eye roll*
Any Dr who pushed the shot has no credibility.
I had a family member die from blood clots not long after his booster. This FR doc claims he has never had a vaxxed patient in his ICU. Its the clues that show everyone he isn’t no doctor
Covid was the PLANdemic, the Clot Shots ARE the pandemic
Suspect source. What?
Anyone who has seen bodies of soccer players collapsing on the field can extrapolate that to 9 pediatric deaths.
For your safety.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.