Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OSHA publishes rule to require vaccination / testing
OSHA ^ | 2021/11/04 | OSHA

Posted on 11/04/2021 6:10:16 AM PDT by Fury

The ETS on Vaccination and Testing was officially filed in the Office of the Federal Register on November 4, 2021. Find information on the COVID-19 Healthcare ETS or on Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19).

(Excerpt) Read more at osha.gov ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: covid19; economy; emergency; greatreset; letsgobrandon; mandate; osha; scamdemic; vaccine; vaxicide; vaxxholes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last
To: nicolezmomma

“Therefore, OSHA is exempting those workers who do not come into contact with others for work purposes from its grave danger finding as well Thad the scope of the ETS.”

From Page63? I hope this is true, at least for us non-vaxed that do work from home. I haven’t been in the office in 8 years and don’t ever plan on going in.


121 posted on 11/04/2021 8:35:02 AM PDT by VastRWCon (Fake News")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: VastRWCon

Good catch—that actually makes sense—even though some companies like Cisco are planning to f&^% over their work at home employees regardless.


122 posted on 11/04/2021 8:37:49 AM PDT by cgbg (A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Not my catch, hope it is true. see post 100

https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4009672/posts?page=100#100


123 posted on 11/04/2021 8:41:19 AM PDT by VastRWCon (Fake News")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Openurmind

New social media word for the day: “grave danger.”

COVID survival rates from July 2021 -

0-14 99.9998%
15-44 99.9931%
45-64 99.9294%
65-85 99.9297%
Over 85 98.2499%


124 posted on 11/04/2021 8:44:32 AM PDT by upchuck (The longer I remain unjabbed, the more evidence I see supporting my decision. Psalm 144:5-8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Fury

From the headline it seems one can get tested and avoid the shot.


125 posted on 11/04/2021 8:47:01 AM PDT by Persevero (You cannot comply your way out of tyranny. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VastRWCon

“From Page63? I hope this is true, at least for us non-vaxed that do work from home. I haven’t been in the office in 8 years and don’t ever plan on going in.”

I was just reading the FAQ, I think it is true.

Hopefully it is true, I will help support my brother and his wife. She is about to lose her job. My brother runs a small business, but business is not good.

We all have very dark days ahead us; we need to be their for our families.


126 posted on 11/04/2021 8:56:59 AM PDT by DEPcom (Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Fury

We are at WAR.


127 posted on 11/04/2021 9:00:49 AM PDT by FreeperCell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fury
One interesting point - Independent Contractors are not subject to the RTS.

I would expect that there will be a move to transition some employees to independent contractors.

I've already received 1 email from a US subsidiary of a German company inquiring about the vaccination status of our employees -- those that might be visiting their facilities, or sub-contractors that might perform work there.

I'm ignoring it for now. This is clearly a blast email using their entire vendor contact list. We supply parts and this request -- legal or not -- wouldn't seem applicable to what we do.

128 posted on 11/04/2021 9:00:53 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DEPcom; VastRWCon

I think this means the company wouldn’t have grounds to terminate unvaxed teleworkers, but nothing stops the company from creating this policy for any new employees.


129 posted on 11/04/2021 9:03:56 AM PDT by nicolezmomma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Dana1960

“I went over to Market Ticker and I didn’t see it?”

If you did you weren’t looking thats why I linked it directly.

You have to click on the link of the most recent ticker.

https://market-ticker.org/cgi-ticker/akcs-www?post=244131

Now click on the blue highlighted phrase

I don’t like this at all.


130 posted on 11/04/2021 9:12:04 AM PDT by Polynikes (Nicht geimpft Mensch 2nd Klasse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: All
JUST IN - OSHA will consider expanding the vaccine mandate to smaller businesses with fewer than 100 employees during a 30-day comment period, according to the U.S. Labor Department
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4009743/posts
131 posted on 11/04/2021 9:48:34 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn
They used a inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. So I wouldn't expect a “spike protein” plus the study was relatively small.

On page 2
Results
Longitudinal follow-up of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody and neutralizing antibody productions after inoculation of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine

What it seems they were looking for is other damage without the Spike protein getting in the way. Apparently they found somethings The focus on the antibodies is bad enough but the A1C remained elevated causing pre-diabetes.

There also was deterioration in both potassium (electrolyte balance) and creatinine levels. That's a kidney damage indicator.

Now with these breakthrough infections that are cropping up allowing re-infection. Well Covid eats diabetics alive. You could roll the dice and get a booster before your AB's drop out and hope everything works out ok. Good luck.

Kidney damage and diabetes are two major co-morbidities that make for a bad outcome. If I had been “Jabbed” I would be watching for a elevated A1C and creatinine levels on a real regular basis. Merry Christmas

132 posted on 11/04/2021 9:56:53 AM PDT by Polynikes (Nicht geimpft Mensch 2nd Klasse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

I said as soon as the 100 employee limit was mentioned that it was just the beginning, they would push for lower until every small business, no matter the size, was under this mandate.

The IRS snooping in bank accounts will catch all the independent contractors first.

I hope state lawsuits will succeed in shutting this down.


133 posted on 11/04/2021 10:03:13 AM PDT by LilFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: LilFarmer
"I hope state lawsuits will succeed in shutting this down."

Agreed. Seems like the best, quickest way to put an end to this mandate/covid madness.

134 posted on 11/04/2021 10:09:25 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: LilFarmer

...let’s just hope there is a court(s) out there that still has rule of law integrity.


135 posted on 11/04/2021 10:10:16 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

FOR SURE. Will these judges dismiss these cases for standing too, like they did all the election fraud cases?

Ugh.

I know that my husband will shut his business down than do this to his employees. His colleagues say the same.


136 posted on 11/04/2021 10:11:24 AM PDT by LilFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Fury
I would expect that there will be a move to transition some employees to independent contractors.

Not in California!
137 posted on 11/04/2021 10:16:01 AM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Fury
The ETS states that Employers are not responsible for the cost of testing, unless is is negotiated via a CBA, etc.

So who is? The employee? FedGov/taxpayers? What happens if the employer 'requires' testing, but the employee doesn't go pay to have a test done?

What about FLSA? Are employees clocking in for the time spent getting their own testing completed? If they're already at minimum wage, or if those costs put their equivalent pay below it, ANY extra expenses required of employees MUST be reimbursed by the employer. Or does OSHA have the power to allow companies to violate the law?
138 posted on 11/04/2021 10:31:22 AM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fury

So does this go straight to the Supreme Court tomorrow?

There has to be thousands of lawsuits taking off now.


139 posted on 11/04/2021 10:35:51 AM PDT by CodeJockey (Think for yourself. (While it's still legal))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polynikes
What does inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine mean?
140 posted on 11/04/2021 10:45:01 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson