Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Not Very Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill—Where’s the Money?
American Thinker.com ^ | November 3, 2021 | Anony Mee

Posted on 11/03/2021 2:50:14 AM PDT by Kaslin

I thought I’d dig around a bit in “H.R. 3684—Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act,” the not very bipartisan infrastructure bill. Everyone’s talking about how the other bill for building back better will be funded, at the perhaps current price tag of $1.75 trillion. I haven’t seen much, though, about how this $1 trillion bill will affect the deficit.

At 2,740 pages, it’s a big bill, designed to “authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway safety programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes.” As far as I’ve been able to tell, only a little more than $381 billion will address highways and such like. That’s the amount to be appropriated out of the Highway Trust Fund to cover the provisions in this bill. However, appropriation language is not standard throughout the bill, so I may have missed some things.

The highway portion of the Highway Trust Fund is just about bankrupt. The per-gallon federal motor fuels excise tax that everyone pays on gasoline and on-road diesel provides the bulk of the funding. It was last increased in 1993. The Congressional Budget Office projects that 2021 revenue will be $32.462 billion and that budgeted outlays will be $45.756 billion, leaving a shortfall of around $13.3 billion. I think it might actually be worse given that fewer of us are driving due to lingering COVID restrictions; the impact of almost-no international air travel, depriving America of tens of millions of tourists; issues surrounding port congestion; and much higher gas prices lessening travel.

By law, the Highway Trust Fund cannot incur a negative balance. The CBO presumes an economic recovery and projects a shortfall between now and FY 2026 of between $7 billion and $13 billion each year.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: yourwallet

1 posted on 11/03/2021 2:50:14 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It is racist to pay for spending……..


2 posted on 11/03/2021 2:53:45 AM PDT by SteelPSUGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

only a little more than $381 billion will address highways and such like.

The rest is wealth redistribution [theft] and porcine boondoggles designed to cripple this once great country and its economy.

It deserves defeat. Not sure how that will occur but it needs to be rejected.


3 posted on 11/03/2021 3:24:52 AM PDT by Adder ("Can you be more stupid?" is a question, not a challenge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder

The wealth redistribution has been rebranded as “human infrastructure” - now gibs dem da money!


4 posted on 11/03/2021 3:37:03 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Since when has either party in Congress ever worried about paying for anything?


5 posted on 11/03/2021 3:46:42 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Without fossil fuels, you can NOT make steel.

Without steel, how will they build or repair bridges???


6 posted on 11/03/2021 6:56:41 AM PDT by ridesthemiles ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson