Where's the Evidence? Fox News Host Presses Sidney Powell on Voter Fraud. She Has Responded.

Townhall.com ^ | November 20, 2020 | Matt Vespa

[prairiebreeze]

Personally, I don’t see Pres. Trump taking any path except via the Constitution and the courts.

[cookcounty]

That is indeed an oddity that no one, including FOX people, have even thought about. If You don’t use your mind, how do you know the election was legit?

[HotHunt]

Thanks for responding.

[StAnDeliver]

Why would SHE give YOU any evidentiary leads until she has fully engaged Equal Protection and, de novo, Article III, Clause 2, Section 2.

[StAnDeliver]

Meow.

[ronnie raygun]

He said he knows joe biden and he is a really nice guy, matt geatz said if biden gets in he will work with him, what the hell is going on?

[StAnDeliver]

"It’s a frigging terrible excuse (more than likely, it’s a lie). Anything dealing with fractional votes could be done using a post processor. The dolt that decided to do it in realtime should be jailed and never be allowed to touch a computer again."

This is so true and it had to have been done for only one reason -- so they could live-query ranked-voting results & report those results to their payors and await the nod to gin the necessary votes.

"Sources say Collins might survive the ranked voting afforded to ur-Canucks."

[faucetman]

“The simpler explanation is that the same proportion of non-straight-Republican voters voted against Trump in every precinct.”

non-straight-Republican voters? You mean GAY Republican voters? Do you have to reveal THAT when you register?

If you are talking about Dr. Shiva, his presentation was very excellent and statistically proved his case.

I have no idea what you really said, but I’ll listen to Dr. Shiva THE GENIUS, instead of you.

[faucetman]

Rewatch the video. This time with your eyes and ears open, Troll.

[Sequoyah101]

Hockey sticks and right angle turns in data never happen naturally. They only happen in climate change and vote counting by being created by someone.

Most of us saw evidence of vote fraud on Wednesday morning in the count data from MI and WI at about 0430 in both places.

That was all I needed to see. Data anomalies like that are bad / tampered with data.

[palmer]

No, the assumption is if split ticket voters voted Biden over Trump, it would be a constant percentage from precinct to precinct. IF 10% of the Republicans in precinct x voted for Biden, then on average, 10% of the voters in precinct y and z would vote for Biden.

The x-axis had percentage of R straight tickets. The y-axis had direct Trump votes (non-straight). The example he gives is 60% straight party and 65% individual votes for Trump. He subtracts 60 from 65 and says 5% more unaffiliated voters voted for Trump. He then says it should be 5% across the board (horizontal line). But that's not correct.

Example 1: 20% straight R and 25% split ticket with Trump. Take a D district with 20 % straight party R vote. There are going to be more people who will vote D party down ballot but vote for Trump. Why? Because he's popular among Dems. Not as popular as BIden but much more popular than establshment RINOs.

Example 2: R district with 60% straight ticket R voting (his example). He claims that 65% of the other voters should also vote Trump. But that's not a logical conclusion. The other 40% of the voters are splitting their ticket because are not Republicans and unlikely to be Trump voters other than the same 25% or maybe a bit more that he picked up my example 1.

There is no reason for the greater percentage of Pro Trump Precincts to have a higher PERCENTAGE of Biden voters.

No, those aren't "pro Trump" precincts. Those are mainly R districts and the pro-Trump voters are the combo of straight ticket Republicans (60%), plus 40 or 45% of the remaining liberals, independents, and non-straight ticket R voters. In fact in my example 2, Trump gets more split ticket voters than my example 1.

Anyway his whole premise is easy to check, just take a single precinct from the right side of curve, only 2,000 or so in an average precinct. Hand count that precinct. It should show the same count as the machine count.

[palmer]

Use the example from the video: 2000 voters, 45% straight party R. Trump got 25% of the non-straight party R. His claim is the precinct is 45% R and thus the 25% Trump vote is "20% less than you would think". No, it's 25% of the D voters.

[Bryan24]

You don’t understand the graph data at all.

[lepton]

Why would SHE give YOU any evidentiary leads until she has fully engaged Equal Protection and, de novo, Article III, Clause 2, Section 2.

---

Was that supposed to be aimed at me?

[Jane Long]

👍🏼

[palmer]

You don’t understand the graph data at all.

I understand it completely. The question is do the presenters not understand it, or are they trying to distract from the real fraud by getting people to chase easily disprovable nonsense. I also understand what is missing. Where are the plots of Biden delta versus straight party D? Not shown, probably because they have the same shaped curve.

Look at about 27:30 in the video. He says 45% straight party R (x-axis). He says that means the precinct is 45% Republican. Not true! Then Trump got 25% of the non-straight party R, thus the 25% Trump vote is "20% less than you would think".

No, it means Trump got 25% of the D voters which is pretty good. Also the downward slope of the curve means the more straight party R there are, the fewer of the Dems are likely to vote Trump. IOW the more outnumbered the D's are, the more likely they are to vote against Trump.