Posted on 05/09/2020 6:55:16 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
In the movie the Matrix, the lead character, Neo, is faced with the stark reality – that we are all slaves. But Neo is given an opportunity. He is given a choice between taking a red pill or the blue pill. The red pill will allow Neo to the ability
After this there is no turning back. You take the blue pill, your story ends. You wake up in bed and believe whatever you want to.
You take the red pill and you stay in wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes. Remember, all I’m offering is the truth.”
At the site Unconstrained Analytics, the Matrix is explained and today’s reaction to the China coronavirus as well:
Real science neither requires nor asks for assent. In contrast, pseudo-sciences, demand obedience to the narratives they propagate — even when these narratives conflict with hard science.
It’s time for America to wake up and look at the real numbers behind the China coronavirus. If we are truly experiencing a “historic” pandemic with unprecedented deaths then this should be obvious in the data. We should see our total deaths for the first four months of 2020 greatly exceed the previous years’ numbers where there was no pandemic, but this is not the case.
The CDC website indicates U.S. death totals for 2015 through 2020 for the first four months of the year average (Jan – Apr) to be at 921,603. This year the total deaths during this period were 944,251 which is slightly more than average but slightly less than the number of deaths in 2017:
We know that 99% of all COVID deaths are related to individuals with more than one other comorbidity (i.e. the individuals had cancer or some other medical condition). We also know that the majority of COVID deaths are those people over age 70.
Children are virtually free from any risk of death from the China coronavirus. Healthy individuals under the age of 65 are also at very low risk.
When looking at the data it is difficult to understand why the US (and the world for that matter) would close down their economies for this virus. The economies stayed open in 2017 and the number of deaths were greater.
To be fair, The CDC website also adds a caveat — Their numbers are being reviewed daily and figures could be a LAGGING indicator.
I say this because people DO die, and they die of different diseases, and we DO NOT live forever, and the more yrs we pile on, the closer we are to dying....
if not covid, so many would have died of plain old pneumonia, or a UTI or failure to thrive, or cancer, or heart disease...
no kidding they had a big article in our local rag about how we're "losing" all these 100yros to covid and how horrible and unfair it is...???????
I went out last night to get a carryout from a local restaurant. I wasn't wearing a mask and smiled at a woman who was also waiting for her order. She tried several times with her eyes then she explained she was smiling back at me. Kind of sad.
I think there's an outside chance that the rest of us just follow the smart people in Tennessee and South Carolina and go back to the way we were before this nonsense pandemic. But I think for the long term health of our freedom it would be better if the truth was told by Trump. That this was a horrible mistake.
CDC mortality data is always lower until the data collection process is complete. The statement below is from the CDC site. Jim Hoft does not know how to read it I guess.
“Collection of complete data is not expected at the time of initial report, and a reliable percentage of deaths due to P&I is not anticipated at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services region or state level within this two week period.”
And it gets even better! When you go to the CDC link in the flubro Jim Hoft article, there is a huge red spike in deaths already for the last few weeks. Way to prove your point Jim! Maybe the lobotomy was not such a good idea.
https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/mortality.html
Are you an actual person or was this written by “artificial lack of intelligence”?
.
More meaningful data will be shown in the 2020-2021 row.
Or are you saying the final scary number = 944,251 + 78,000 or 1,022,251 because that would be something to cause concern. But I think the real point is there is no evidence to justify this economic suicide by the CDC numbers.
So the numbers beg the question: How many deaths related to obesity, diabetes, heart disease and chronic respiratory problems have been counted incorrectly as Wuhan Virus deaths?
a lot when they get paid an extra 13k to 39k if they put them on a ventilator.
Total deaths from all causes 2019 vs 2020, compared week to week is the best data, and gets rid of all reporting bias.
That data is available, and it does show the _net_ impact of CV on the total death rate.
(I will let you figure out what those numbers look like...)
Where is that data? I failed to find it when I looked the other day.
Naturally!
What else would you expect after 35-years of thorough communist indoctrination in government schools...
We have three generations of trained communists carefully brainwashed by 35-years of communist teachers, while the children's abusive birth parents blissfully assisted the communists by committing the children to these asylums...
Ultimately, it is these parents who are responsible for the final plummet of the Nation into the tyranny that is upon us...
My question was somewhat facetious.
My question was somewhat facetious.
Bttt
Their website could present data in a better way.
The Percent of Deaths from P&I spiked, but only in their Region 4. It looks like NY, CN, NJ are the hotspots.
I wish they reported absolute numbers. Comparing percentages year to year can lead to erroneous conclusions, particularly since everyone is staying home. Car accidents, etc are down, so naturally the percentage of P&I would rise.
Nonetheless, that is alarming and should be watched closely.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.