1 posted on
10/01/2019 4:21:12 PM PDT by
RightGeek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: RightGeek
...biggest iceberg in more than 50 years. More than 50 years ago, big icebergs like this one were known to calf.
What is the news? What am I missing?
To: RightGeek
The idea that this is unusual is ridiculous.
To: RightGeek
If you like this thread, you’ll love Ian McEwan’s novel Solar, hillairious farce!!
To: RightGeek
86 posted on
10/01/2019 6:16:24 PM PDT by
polymuser
(It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and how few by deceit. Noel Coward)
To: RightGeek
“is roughly in balance with its surroundings, despite experiencing strong surface melt in summer.” What the hell does that mean?
100 posted on
10/01/2019 8:02:56 PM PDT by
Fungi
To: SunkenCiv
103 posted on
10/01/2019 8:26:36 PM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(Who will think of the gerbils ? Just say no to Buttgiggity !)
To: RightGeek
Not since the early 1960s has Amery calved a bigger iceberg. That was a whopping 9,000 sq km in area. So, if "recorded" history on iceberg breaks started in 1970, then this is the largest iceberg break in recorded history!
Don't laugh. A lot of these climate change scare tactics are done merely by adjusting the start date of their recordings. Sounds like "scientific research" has gone the way of journalism. But as long as we have dolts like Occasionally Coherent and Greta the Wonder Chicken spouting about the end of the world, what the hey?
104 posted on
10/01/2019 8:35:56 PM PDT by
ssaftler
(The opinions expressed here have not been peer reviewed, fact checked or focus group tested.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
