Intel Community Admission Of Whistleblower Changes Raises Explosive New Questions

I can guarantee you there is a filing cabinet with a folder that has an original copy of that form, with a cover sheet with a list of the revisions and a list of approval signatures with dates.

Exactly. This supposedly final revision form lacks several important things. First of all it lacks of FORM NUMBER. . . and it lacks the date it was approved for use, citing just “Rev: August 2019.” Which is NOT the correct governmentese for Federal form dating. Those must use an abbreviation which would be “Rev.” not “Rev:” with a colon. The entire form looks like an ad hoc knock off provided by some low-level staffer, done on their word processor to provide verisimilitude when someone noticed the “Rev. 24MAY19” form was noticed to have the requirement to have first-hand information and a prohibition to be based on second-hand reporting. Someone said “Let’s get a new form quick” and literally did not have time to run it through all the hurdles and editing a government form must go through for approval. Somethings just did not get included, like, for instance that this is FORM 401, as the original shows. The newly revised (or created form) instead of what’s on the original in the footer says this:

IC IG CPD – ICWSP Disclosure Form

What, pray tell, is “IC IG CPD”? That “CPD” is nowhere to be found on the original form. On the original, where “Disclosure Form” is located here, it says instead “Form 401”. Say what? How do they order replacement forms from the government IC central supply? There are numerous “disclosure forms” in stock. The people running the IC supply would not have a clue which one to send. In addition, every government form which has more than a single page must number the succeeding pages. The original has a page number (page ii) in the header. This one does not have a page number anywhere on it, but we know it’s at least page 2. . . but no page number in either the header of the footer. That error would NEVER survive editorial review in the approval process. Ergo, it was never approved for use.

From what I understand, it looks like someone retroactively changed the rules and the form to allow the complaint. When both the complaint and the rule change are outside the scope of the ICWPA.

They didn’t even do it retroactively. The didn’t backdate their changes. They merely left the date of their changes OFF the new form, hoping no one would notice that everything took place before the form change occurred and that we are too stupid to ask why there’s no day on a form that requires a day/month/year for a form revision date. They were either sloppy, or there was no way they could do it retroactively in the records.

The Law that governs the reporting of Urgent Concerns has a specific timeline from when a whistleblower submits report to the Intelligence Community Inspector General (IC IG). Once the IC IG receives the complaint, a 14 day calendar starts dropping pages before the IG must make a determination of credibility or not, and then report his determination of Credibility to the Director of National Intelligence (DNI). At that point, another 7 day calendar starts shedding its pages, at the end of which the DNI must make the determination if the matter is, or is not, an Urgent Matter, according to the criteria as outlined in the same law. IF he determines it is, he MUST notify the House and Senate Intelligence Oversight Committees that there is an Urgent Concern for their attention and oversight. That’s a total of 21 days from the time the whistleblower IN the Intelligence Community reports suspect or wrong doing by someone else IN the Intelligence Community.

In the past, the IC IG and the DNI have reported even routine, and often non-credible whistleblower reports to the oversight committees as a matter of routine. This time it was different because the whistleblower complaint was different.

First of all, the whistleblower was NOT reporting something he/she knew first-hand. He/she was reporting rumors and second-and-third-hand reports that he/she apparently investigated on his/her own, completely absent any first-hand knowledge, apparently arrogating to him/herself the investigative job of the IG. Secondly, the person being reported was by no stretch of facts or even opinion, a member of the Intelligence Community, but someone completely outside of the jurisdiction of the IG and even the DNI. Thirdly, the reported event spilled over into the area of separation of powers. The IC IG arrogantly assumed he DID have authority to report that person’s activities to Congress. The DNI, and the career legal-counsel lawyers in the DOJ said he did not.

Let’s look at the time line:

July 25, 2019 — President Trump’s conversation with the leader of Ukraine
July 29, 2019 — DNI Dan Coates announces his retirement effective August 15, 2019.
August 8, 2018 — President Trump announces the resignation of Assistant Director of National Intelligence Sue Gordon effective August 15, 2019
August 8, 2019 — President Trump announces the naming of Vice Adm. Joseph McGuire (ret.) as the new Acting Director of National Intelligence effective August 15, 2019
August 12, 2019 — Date of the complaint filed with the IC IG about Trump’s call to Ukraine’s leader. Complaint is on old form dated 24MAY18, but with full six-page complaint attached with many lengthy footnotes in legal form as though written with the assistance of legal counsel. 14 day alendar starts shedding pages.
August 12, 2019 — Date on the letter written by IC IG Atkinson to both chairmen of the House and Senate Oversight Committees complaining about the DNI’s decision and delaying sending an “Urgent Concern” to their committees. (SAY WHAT?!)
August 15, 2019 — DNI Dan Coats and Assistant DNI Sue Gordon step down. DNI Joseph McGuire takes the reins as head of all National Intelligence Agencies. IC IG day 3 on calendar countdown of whistleblower complaint. 11 days to go before IG Atkinson transmits complaint to DNI McGuire for his determination of “Urgency.”
August 2019 — Someone took the opportunity in this time of chaos to revise the Form 401, the “Urgent Concern Disclosure Form”
August 26, 2019 — IC IG transmits whistleblower complaint to DNI McGuire for review and determination of “Urgent Concern” or not. New 7 day calendar starts dropping its pages on the floor.
August 27-29, 2019 — DNI McGuire reviews whistleblower complaint and brings in the Intelligence Community Legal Counsel, who advises him that the President is not a member of the Intelligence Community and does fall under jurisdiction of the IC IG, and does NOT meet the statutory requirements of the IC IG empowering act and is therefore not under the jurisdiction of either the DNI, the IC IG, or the requirements of the “Urgent Concern” provisions. Day 6 through 4 of the countdown calendar have fallen.
August 30, 2019 —The new DNI decides to have his decision that this is not a matter they can refer to the Congressional Oversight Committees, reviewed by the Department of Justice Legal Counsel’s office for assurance he is correct. The 3rd day has fallen, but remember these are not business days, but calendar days according to the statute, and August 30th is a Friday. Countdown days 2 through 1 fall on a Saturday and Sunday, and as we all know, nothing happens in DC on a weekend, blowing the rest of the critical time.
August 30, 2019 — Per the later testimony of DNI McGuire before the House Oversight Committee, when it became apparent that the DOJ career lawyers would not be able get through with legal review in sufficient time for the calendar, although he had already determined to his satisfaction that it was not an “Urgent Concern,” requiring transmission to Congress, through an excess of caution, the DNI wrote to the Chairmen of the two committees and informed them there was a possible “Urgent Concern” that was being referred to the DOJ and FBI for their consideration and that he would need one more week for their determination if it was any concern at all. Both chairmen granted the week’s delay. 7 day Clock reset.
August 30, 2019 — at an unknown time slightly before or slightly after this date — Apparently, the IC DG, or to be fair, someone in his office, transmitted the complaint and the IC IG’s own complaint letter to Congress without the approval of the DNI or the Department of Justice. . . Possibly to Rep. Adam Schiff on August 12, 2019, the date on the letter. Official date of transmission is claimed to be:
September 6, 2019 — IC IG Atkinson bypasses the DNI and DOJ to transmit complaint to Congress.

Note that a lot of this, including the re-writing, re-creation of the now infamous form occurred during the vacuum of a complete shift in top leadership at the DNI office. Someone took advantage of that vacuum.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.